There
aren't many people who do not know what Islam is and Muslims are these days
We're facing a soon to be critical issue that modern, peaceful, and
civilized society does not see coming. There are two worlds colliding
with what has already proven to be... explosive results.
Western
culture of Democracy and Freedom is being attacked across the globe.
It's being attacked with guns and bombs. It's being attacked with
words and propaganda. Our Freedoms in the Western world are being
challenged and systematically removed. Your Freedom will be taken
from you piece by piece until you have none.
Many despots might be
willing to assault you for what you have but this particular despot
is called Islam. One cannot consider oneself a Muslim unless you are
willing to submit fully to Islamic law. Islamic law isn't an idea
that is variable. It is quite strict and it is quite “written in
stone” goes the phrase.
There
is one thing that you may count on as a fact in this world. I think
you know what I mean but I'll get to that in a minute. First I issue
a warning specifically to my own country but also to every country.
It is not a question if Islam will come for you, it is a guarantee.
Their own religion tells them it is so. This is not new folks. We're
simply in a new battle that is part of a very old war. You may ignore
it or say it can't happen but know that for your choice your country,
heritage, history, and the freedom of your very children or
grandchildren is at stake.
I
do not intend to teach you in this document, everything there is to
know about this religion. I'm going to teach you a hell of a lot though. I simply ask that you think about what your
opinion is on this matter and why. You might already be aware and
interested. Teach a friend or your family. This is something we
cannot hide from any longer. You can see already what happens in
Islamic countries. Why are there so many young men of typical
fighting age fleeing instead of freeing their countries? All the while, women and children are left behind and actively fighting against Daesh (ISIS to some).
The answer
isn't as obvious as it seems.
They don't need guns and bombs to
conquer the West. The West as in the United States, Canada, Western
Europe and Scandinavia.
I
encourage you don't just take my word for it either. There are many
other wonderful sources out there such as the one below.
I
guarantee that you'll find this to be a far better provider of
information than I. Enough of an introduction though, to the
point.
According
to the Quran and according to the Prophet of this religion by the
name of Muhammad one either follows all of it or is considered to not
be Muslim. That's pretty basic stuff. Some may say Christianity
makes similar demands. It once did but simply read the news, check
the research. There's a Christian lunatic once in a while for sure.
There are probably a lot more who make us really uncomfortable with some ideas and ideals we find ridiculous but uncomfortable is far different from dead. Fact
of the matter is that they almost never explode in public. We cannot
say the same for Muslims. If we can say the same for Muslims it's usually because we are one.
Muslims have an amazing ability to say Islam wasn't involved, every single time Islam is involved.
This
is a complicated and quite sensitive topic for the majority in our
Western society because if you talk about it the peaceful Muslims
will try to kill you. They very well might do it in your very own home
country. We can continue saying that it's not already happening and
it won't happen but but it very clearly is if we look for ourselves.
We're on a dangerous path in the dark and moving at high speed. If we
don't slow down and turn on the lights it's going to be a hell of a
crash I can promise you that.
There
are a lot of issues in the modern world that we need to concern
ourselves with but many of us are quite busy and don't exactly have
the time to research a thesis on Islam. You don't need to because I'm
going to give you a solid-base knowledge of the subject right here and
now. I have been studying Islam since Islam slammed planes into the
towers in New York. Until that time I couldn't tell you that I even
knew what Islam was. It hadn't ever crossed my mind before. After
that day I began to read first some books, then some more books, the
Quran itself, the Hadith. This information is all out there. Be
careful where you get your information too. I'll show you a couple of
handy examples of how Muslims use fractions of quotations in order to
make them peaceful sounding. Years ago I could have ignored it and
listened to the media saying Islam isn't the problem, but I chose to
look for myself. I needed to find out for myself.
What
I learned is many, many things...
It
is in our nature as humans to want to trust each other so that we
can work together and become stronger. It is also in our nature as
humans to notice things that might be different about other humans,
landscapes, animals and likely quite a number of other things. The
reason for this is nothing more than survival. We have as humans,
evolved and adapted and this became part of us.
No
matter how open minded you want to think you are, you are in fact
racist to some extent you cannot help. The problem arises when some
people just run with it and others try overly hard to not be racist
and end up as reverse-racist.
I
would define reverse-racism as trying so hard to prove I am not
racist that I feel "minorities" should get extra or
special rights to make up for some perceived slight to them in the
past.
We
have learned as humans not as individuals and not only in our
lifetimes as to what things tend to pose a danger to us.
Let
your mind wonder back in history if you would for a moment and think
about what you believe life might have been like for early humans.
Simple survival without all of the things we now have to protect us.
Humans knew then just as well as they know now, that other humans
were just as great of a danger if not more than any other creature
or nature they may face.
Think
about how many civilizations in the past, welcomed newcomers into
their lands with open arms and were slaughtered for their generosity
and kindness.
The
one thing that humans are better at than any other creature on this
planet and that is killing anything and everything they choose for
whatever reason so inspires them at the moment. Humans weren't born with fangs and claws for killing but were instead given the ability to reason and plan.
No other creature
decides, plans, sometimes goes to great lengths to finance and for an
example, then takes a bow and arrow and shoots an animal with it and
feels no remorse for the suffering of that animal for 48 hours before
it dies. He didn't need to use a bow. A gun would have done the job
possibly instantly. He wasn't even hungry. He only killed it to show
what a good archer he was and so he could cut off it's head and
mount it on the wall as a trophy.
Not
only does this particular human do this. He does it with the full
knowledge of a great number of other humans who also are not bothered
at all. They aren't bothered even by the fact that we humans may
kill off the very last of the lions, elephants, rhino's, and on and
on. This doesn't matter to humans because the "world is ours."
Who
gave this world to us and how do we know that?
Have
you ever played that game where a number of people sit in a line and
somebody whispers a semi-complicated phrase to the first person. The
first person is supposed to whisper the exact same thing to the
second and so on and so forth.
If
you have played this game think about how the results turned out.
If
you haven't played this game, get 5 or 10 friends or coworkers and
give it a go. Do you think I can accurately predict whether the
majority of humans will have all heard and repeated the exact same
phrase? Do you think I can accurately predict roughly what
percentage of that phrase will start the same way it ends?
I
think that I can and I would not even need to do that work myself.
It's out there. The internet is both a cesspool of rotting,
stinking, rubbish but it's also unmatched for the amount of correct
information that can be obtained as well.
I would suspect that the majority of
Westerners would have to agree to some extent that though we may
speak different languages we are still extended families and clans.
The numbers of us are significantly higher as we could likely
ascertain. We hate each other at times for all manner of petty things
and we disagree on how or when to do what or what to do at all. Our
cultures are not that far off because we are not that far separated.
When I walk around Germany or France or anywhere else I've been, the
only thing that stands out about me is that my language isn't the
same.
Everybody
hates the Americans these days. Everybody thinks the French are twats
and the Swiss are rich and cowardly. The Russians are sneaky and out
to get us while China wants to buy the world and pollute it into
oblivion. Some black people hate white people and vice versa and
overall even the Spanish belittle Mexicans who belittle Puerto
Ricans. Some Christians hate Protestants and Muslims hate Jews.
Sometimes our fears are simply bias and conditioning but sometimes
our fears of each other are well founded. It hasn't got anything to
do with the specific color of any individual but it does have to do
with culture and beliefs. We have allowed our manners to get so far
ahead of ourselves that we refuse to defend our own culture and
beliefs in our own homes.
Do
you suppose that the wiser of us humans should, and would wish for a
peaceful and prosperous existence?
It
sounds nice to me. I would personally love to live in a world where
I never had to worry and where everybody was a friendly face. The
problem we are facing as a society and a culture is that we want so
badly to see friendly faces that we mask our own vision and our own
evolutionary preservation mechanisms in order achieve this inside of
our own cognition. It is not tangible and will not protect you.
Once
again I propose to ask yourself if you think it to be more
beneficial to believe there are no hazards or to turn and face what
may be an uncomfortable situation and deal with it?
Wishing for peace and prosperity is noble. To believe that wishing is going to bring that peace and prosperity is ignorant.
Not everybody is peaceful or would prefer peace and they couldn't care less what you want.
In
my mind I suppose I see it somewhere along lines such as these: If I
am jogging through the forest and I choose to ignore that there have
been wolf sightings will this protect me and keep me safe? I might
feel better about going for that jog if I tell myself that the
wolves probably just passed through and are gone. I might even take
my jog with zero incidents. Today... how about tomorrow? What about
the next day?
Another
question... Who has killed more of who, wolves killing humans or
humans killing wolves? Have sharks killed more humans or have humans killed more sharks? How about bears? We, Humans are the super-predators.
Do
you prefer not not offend the wolves by assuming they are not
dangerous? Not all wolves will attack you. Most of the time you'll
never know the wolf was there and you'll never have a problem.
Sometimes he'll come right up to camp and play with your sled dogs.
Sometimes
he'll bring a few friends and pick your bones clean so which is your
stance?
What
is it that makes the wolves different from humans?
Would
you be agreeable with me if I said that wolves can't reason and
think things over quite like humans can?
Is
there any way of knowing which wolves will eat me and which ones
won't?
Would
you agree that the logical method of dealing with such a situation
would not include bringing packs of wolves into the neighborhood or into your home?
Most
humans are wired to want to trust but we must remember that humans
are the most dangerous predator on the planet. Humans are the ones
who will kill each other over a few dollars in a wallet or a
perceived insult.
Wolves only have their senses to work with. If a
wolf doesn't need to eat you to survive he very likely will not. The
wolf might harm you if you appear to be threatening her or her pups.
The wolf won't ever make a conscious choice to kill you just for fun.
Humans will shoot you in the back while you're out for a jog one day
because they felt like it and you were in the wrong place.
- Humans these days tend to be a bit fucked-up in general wouldn't you say?
Cultural
diversity is a failed social experiment that works just fine as long
as you're mixing people of similar enough cultures. This gives that
diversity and makes life more rich and interesting. Cultures who are closer in similarity will be able to relate to common values and ideas and will adopt from each other. This is generally peaceful and beneficial to both.
To mirror this
result by mixing two widely differing cultures will never occur.
Instead you will end up with a clash of cultures and it's companion
who goes by the name of violence.
If
there's one thing that we humans do better than simply being
difficult and complicated and that is stick to our ideas and our own
ideals like glue. Some of us truly never allow ourselves an unbiased
assessment of the world due to our own insecurities. There are few
tasks more difficult than to change the mind of an individual who is
absolutely sure he or she is right even if he or she is not correct
at all. One of the tasks that you will find more difficult is to
change the minds of an entire social group. Group think is not a good
thing.
You
know that you are right because you mean well as far as your reality
extends.
The
other or other(s) are sure they are correct as well.
Cultural Diversity + 2 Similar Cultures = Mutual Similarities and Enrichment over time.
Cultural Diversity + 2 Opposite In Nature Cultures = Stronger Culture slowly... or quickly if the stronger culture is quite violent; destroys the weaker culture.
When
it comes to humans we have resorted again and again and again to the
same method and we call it violence and warfare. The majority of
people in Western culture will also generally agree that warfare and
violence is not a positive thing emotionally. I don't want to see harm come to undeserving others for no reason. That makes me uncomfortable that it might
happen to me for no reason or even worse to somebody I love.
We
like to think that deep down everybody is just like us and they will "see the light" so to speak, but that simply isn't true.
If
you had been taught nothing but religion and taught to never
question that religion from the time you were born until your 20's
and even 30's or 40's do you think your mind would be changed
easily?
If
you had been taught the same way, that your way was mandated by god
and must be followed and that those who don't follow are not humans
and not worthy of rights, what do you suppose you would believe?
No matter how kind I may be toward others there will always be others willing to harm me or you for their benefit. Everybody sees the world in a different manner and some choose not to see it at all.
Keep in mind while I am taking you through some of the teachings of the Quran and Hadith this very important issue. Some may say all religions say the same sorts of things. To some extent that is true. However, there is a very important difference between for example the Bible and the Quran. The Bible consists largely of stories about people or an event that are largely left to interpretation. Largely these are not God speaking to man who writes it down. Sometimes they were written long after the alleged event. There were many different authors that could be associated with the Bible and some aren't named. When we're dealing with the Quran it is basically a dictation of orders which were passed directly to Muhammad and written down as they were. There is no room to interpret. These simply are as they are. God's word, which came directly from God to his final prophet. They are specific in how they are to be carried out in relation to all manner of life. Christianity is a religion. Judaism is a religion. Islam is and has always been a fanatical ideology and a handbook filled with orders handed from God to mankind.
Let
us now talk about building a Muslim.
According
to the Quran, a non-Muslim is less than nothing:
That
is why it is necessary to Islamize them by force and by humiliation.
And those who resist Islam and its founder must be chastised,
according to the Quran:
For
failing to accept Allah and his messenger:
- (Sura
5:33) "You will put them to death or you will make them suffer
the torture of the cross; you will cut their hands and their feet
alternately. They will be driven from the country"
"Cut
their hands and feet alternately" means cut them off, not a few
stitches to fix. You are left with no right hand and no left foot
and I'm sure you can sort out the reasoning. This is still practiced in the majority if not all Islamic countries to this day. They just tend to not advertise that fact.
- (Sura
47:35) "Do not display cowardice, and do not call the infidels
to peace when you are superior to them"
Do
not display cowardice? You mean like fleeing to Germany instead of
fighting for Allah and your religion in Syria or Iraq? Unless of
course you're bringing Islam to the unbelievers rather than running
from a war. War makes a good excuse for generous countries to let
people in.
I
consider myself a realist and I tend to not be inclined to attack
people whether I'm stronger or not. If I were inclined to attack
somebody I would certainly want to be sure I was stronger than he,
she, or them... wouldn't you?
Islam
is interpreted in a realist manner as to how it fits in at any given
time.
Take
into account circumstances and make and make peace when you or your
armies are weak but when they are not you must attack the Infidel.
This is given as an order from Allah. Keep in mind that attack
doesn't always mean physical these days.
There
is one particular thing that isn't actually up for "interpretation."
The Quran is the word of Allah for all Muslims, it holds for all
times and all peoples until the end of the world. Anybody who
actually is a Muslim, knows this is considered a fact within Islam.
The
Hadith are the more or less historical records of the life of
Muhammad. The life of the man can obviously not be changed. The
information is available. The Quran was alleged by Muhammad to be
the final prophesies from god or "Allah." Muhammad was the
final messenger according to Islam and these were the final rules
given to mankind.
Islam
is mandated by Allah (God) with laws known as Sharia. These Sharia
laws are therefore, inseparable from Islam and are a requirement for
Muslims. Currently there are roughly forty percent of Muslims living
in England who admit they would prefer Sharia Law in England. You
will get similar results in other European countries taking large
quantities of Muslim immigrants. The longer the communities in host
country have been established and the larger they grow the more of a
turn you will see toward Sharia law in every instance. This will
start to turn into “no go zones” that many European cities have
and continue to uncomfortably and hastily deny.
There are no go zones in Brussels, Belgium; Paris, France;
Stockholm Sweden; Oslo, Norway; Rotterdam, Netherlands; Birmingham,
UK; Copenhagen, Denmark; and far more other cities than I care to go
to the trouble of listing.
- These are areas where Fire personnel, Medics, and even Police do not generally go because they will be met with violence. You aren't safe there without a uniform on either.
Islam
is spreading fast.
Did
you know that only seven percent of Germans were Nazis during World
War II? Seven percent of the population killed hundreds of thousands
to millions of Jews (and yes it happened) under the nose of the
peaceful Germans. It only took seven percent to unleash war upon the
world. The percentage of Muslims in Western countries that are
willing to admit they believe it's alright to suicide bomb and commit
terror acts against infidels is up to twenty percent or more of the Muslim population in many Western countries. This Muslim population is growing incredibly fast
Does
this not concern you?
Germany has taken in an astonishing amount of Muslims in the past couple years and so have some others. Check this out.
Have
you considered what percentage of those same Muslim populations may not be
willing to admit but do in fact agree with the violence toward
Infidels?
Have
you considered what percentage of Muslims don't mind if their
fellows murder you? That they may not be willing to actually do it
themselves but that they don't care when it's done to you by others?
If
you hoped to move in, grow in population with other "believers"
and then achieve Islam ruling the world would you tell the rest of
the world first and warn them? In the end, Islam must rule the
entire world as is written in Islamic script. There isn't another
option.
Might
you instead of speaking up for Sharia, just to keep quiet and not
spoil the free money and protected status you're getting? Is that a possibility?
Does
it seem suspicious that we're often told that terror has nothing to
do with Islam and yet the vast majority of terrorist acts are
undertaken by people claiming Islam?
I
can show you hundreds of different instances in several different
countries where the crime is committed in the name of Islam and is
denied by other Muslims. Obviously somebody is lying to us so who is
it? Where are all of the Muslims standing up to demand and prove
Islam is peaceful? You may see one guy say it here and one woman say
it there but the "majority" of so called peaceful Muslims
are not jumping up and defending us at all but instead getting defensive if
we look toward Islam.
- Why do Muslims need to be so defensive of the religion if the religion is so tolerant and peaceful?
I
am willing to guarantee you this. If you take these so called
"radicals" and quiz them on the Quran you will find that
most will be able to recite long sections if not the entire thing from memory.
Meanwhile the "peaceful"
Muslims can't even make an argument about the peaceful Quran without
leaving out entire sections of quotations or simply not knowing them
in the first place.
It
turns out that, despite the president’s suggestion to the contrary,
since 9/11, “we collectively have received nearly zero help from
the Muslim Community," according to former FBI Counterterrorism agent
John Guandolo.
Guandolo,
who pointed out on that a “vast majority” of U.S. mosques and
Islamic centers are a part of a much larger “jihadi network." What’s even worse, perhaps, is what these Islamic
organizations ARE doing instead, according to Guandolo, community
leaders “certainly give the air as if they are helping (Jihadis, not us),” if one
looks at the “major Islamic organizations, the major Islamic
centers in the United States,” they have “condemned all of the
counter-terrorism policies and they’ve gotten the government to
kowtow to them, to turn only to them for advice.”
Though
President Barack Obama claimed that America must “enlist Muslim
communities” to combat terrorism it turns out that Muslim
communities which are notoriously close (like family) don't seem to
be so keen on the idea?
The
statement that "Unbelievers are worse than "the vilest
beasts" seems to be showing through if not in words but in
actions and lack of actions both on the part of Muslims.
- (Sura
98:6) Those who reject (Truth) among the People of the Book and among
the Polytheists, will abide in hell-fire, they are the worst of
creatures.
Think
of the most terrible and vile things that exist in this world.
Whether you believe it or not imagine for a moment that God or
"Allah" did create them. What do you imagine? A spider or
a snake, cancer, AIDS, it doesn't matter at all because worse than
those things are the unbelievers.
If
you were raised to believe this and that you were superior but you
were by yourself or highly outnumbered would you attack or would you
make peace?
Would
some people consider causing trouble then if more of their friends
arrived to back you up?
So
you might consider being quiet so as not to get your ass beat or get
thrown out just like I would?
If
you thought it was unfair that you had to do this and despised these
people would you take things from them? Maybe something like welfare?
Afterall, you're getting their money for doing nothing. If you
thought you had something that would make these people you hate give
you more without even having to fight for it then would you?
Did you know that Islam has a thing called Jizya? Jizya is a per capita yearly tax that is levied by Islamic states on non-Muslim "subjects" or "dhimmis" who are permanently residing in "Muslim lands."
- To me it seems as though the benefits these Muslims come to our countries expecting could be seen by them as Jizya don't you think?
Many
would say most Muslims are peaceful people. I would retort that most
Muslims are not violence prone or even capable people but that doesn't make them
peaceful. Most humans in general tend to shy away from violence.
Psychological barriers that most humans seem to have.
I
think we could agree that most Muslims are not going to personally try to kill
us. The first question is which Muslims are willing to try to kill us? We know some of them are because there have been 1274 Islamic
attacks in 50 countries, in which 11774 people were killed and 14303
injured in 2016 alone. During the calendar year of 2015 there were
2862 Islamic attacks in 53 countries, in which 27594 people were
killed and 26141 injured. I could continue to go on but if you will
recall, Islam is a really old religion... It is an unchanged religion
and one that has been doing what it is still doing since roughly 570
AD.
The
Quran breeds contempt for anyone who is not a Muslim. This is not
something that is done passively. The Quran makes it very clear in
many places that non-Muslims are not to be ignored, are not to be
befriended, and are absolutely and must be a target of Islam. If the
I suggested personally many of the things the Quran suggests, I would
be locked in jail for making terroristic threats.
If
such people are not really human beings, but are on a level of wild
and vile beasts, then you do not need to treat them as human beings.
Psychologically it is the same dynamic as used by Nazi Germany in
regard to the Jews. First calling them sub-human (to remove the
barrier that is naturally in most people's conscience against
killing another human being), and then seeking to eradicate them.
Islam
has the clear rule that no Muslim should be killed in Qisas
(punishment) for killing a Kafir (disbeliever).
Muslim
apologists and Muslims themselves like to frequently use different
Quran quotes out of context to show that it is peaceful the religion
is. One of my personal favorites is:“…if any one killed a
person, it would be as if he killed the whole of mankind; and if any
one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole
of mankind…” - The Holy Quran (Chapter Five, Verse 32).
That
doesn't sound that bad does it?
Here
is The Holy Quran (Chapter Five, Verse 32) in full and in context.
On
that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one
slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in
the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any
one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole
people. Then although there came to them our apostles with clear
signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit
excesses in the land.
The
Children of Israel? That's the Jews not the Muslims...
Does
it have the same feeling to it when you know that? This rule doesn't
apply to Muslims at all or in any way.
The
Jews must not kill a man but the Quran says that Muslims should:
Quran
(2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn
them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah
[disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing... but if they desist,
then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful (if you submit). And fight
them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of
others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they
cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun(the
polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"
Even
if this were a command to the Muslims, there's still: "unless
it be for murder or spreading mischief in the land."
If
someone is "spreading mischief," he can still be killed.
Now let's think for a moment. Would you guess that a majority of
Muslims believe Americans to be spreading mischief in Palestine,
Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc?
I
am making the argument that Islam is not a religion of peace and
being Muslim (follower of Islam) is not something that should be
considered positive.
People
who oppose Islam are called racists and xenophobes and Islamaphobic
and others as well. Keep in mind that a phobia is an irrational fear.
I
am not personally bothered being called a xenophobe and various other
standard labels that are freely tossed about by those who fail to
summon a retort that will win the argument. If that
is the most solid argument one can summon then rigorous education is
needed to bring that individual up to speed with your average middle
school student.
Few
people remain un-bothered by being called such things because they
have a negative social connotation. The problem arises when we fear
being called a name more than we value our own existence.
That my
friends is precisely how we have arrived in our current predicament.
I
find the labels applied to people who point out Islamic tendencies to
be a bit tedious. It's easier to call a name than to do some research
and find out something that appears contrary to one's own personal
beliefs. That requires other things to be thought about and
considered. These people have a different skin color in the majority
of cases so it's easy to call racist.
The problem is that Islam is an
ideology not a race. Now the thing is that it's easy to call Islam a
race because most Muslims happen to be of Arabic decent, Persian,
Pakistani, etc. and they all have a permanent tan. Another huge
majority of Muslims can be found coming from Africa. They also tend
to have a permanent tan. Whatever, it's not the tan that we're
talking about. Not all Muslims are black or arab, some are white and
asian and etc. So it turns out that disliking Islam, only equates to
being racist if you fail to recognize the difference between a skin
color and a learned mindset.
When
it comes right down to it, skin color isn't what divides us. Belief
systems are what divides us. Belief systems are more or less another
way of saying culture is what divides us not color. Skin color just
happens to be accurate more often than it is inaccurate at predicting
culture. You can mix races of the same or similar belief
systems/cultures, but you cannot mix groups of people who's values
are polar opposites. In these instances the weaker culture will die
out and be overtaken by the one who has no problem fighting. Simple
and historically guaranteed.
- Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum - This translates roughly to "if you wish peace, prepare for war."
- What I find interesting is how old a statement has to be originally to be written in Latin. That and the fact that if you open your eyes and look around you'll find that it's still true. If you aren't willing to fight for peace somebody else will be willing to fight to rule you.
I
personally have read that xenophobia is the fear of foreigners. I'm
told that's the correct definition now the part that perplexes me is
as follows: Afraid of foreigners could take a lot of forms but
generally this is looked at as an "unreasonable" fear. That
would be like running around bitching about Canadians being such
shitty and unfreindly people. The majority of people would be correct
in looking at he who was afraid of Canadians as being a lunatic.
I've
been to Canada, sure, I bet there are some twats there just like
everywhere else but most Canadians are pretty nice people. They're
foreign as well. I've been to Germany twice. I've been to Austria,
Netherlands and France. Sure it's a little bit scary going to a
foreign country but the Germans we met were all such nice people. I
loved that country and everything about it. It truly makes me sad to
see what is happening to Germany right now as I type this. France was beautiful as well and sure, the
Parisians aren't exactly patient and friendly people but neither are
New Yorkers. Austria was great and so was the Netherlands. I had some
of the best times of my life and have nothing but good things to say
overall about these "foreigners."
The
interesting thing about these "foreigners" (Germans, French, Canadians, etc.) that I named is
their Judeo-Christian rooted values which match ours. We are the Dar
Al-Harb to the Islamic world. That would translate to "The House
of War" which refers to all people and lands not yet ruled by
Islam.
- It is not the house of war because we make war, it is the house of war because Muslims are commanded to make war upon us until we submit to them.
The key term there is yet. Islam says that Dar
Al-Islam or "The House of Islam" must make war with the
west until there is no more Dar Al-Harb. That translates to there is
no Britain, France, Germany, Sweden, Norway, even no more United
States. All must eventually be ruled by a Caliphate in the name of
Islam. This IS NOT as suggestion for Muslims, it is the ultimate goal
in this life.
The
thing about this is that I happen to love my country. I enjoyed it
the way it once was. You know, when there was no possibility of you
walking down the street and getting fragged by somebody screaming
Allahu Akbar as he detonates in public. Remember when women in
Germany and Norway could go outside in their own neighborhoods and
not be gang-raped by people screaming Allahu Akbar. Remember when
people in our own cities and towns respected our military instead of
shooting them in recruiting offices, on bases? For the English,
sawing off Lee Rigby's head while he was in uniform in his own home
streets while usually muttering or screaming about Allahu Akbar and/or killing
infidels.
Why
in my own country should I have to worry about a culture that
believes killing me is the highest priority? Why in my own country
should I have to explain why people are allowed to do something in my
country, to a person who's a guest? A recipient our charity who tells
us that were wrong and sometimes gets very violent? Why should I be
asked to allow a culture that has destroyed it's own countries and
terrifies it's people, come into my house so I too may be victimized?
Why
should my taxes go to freeing a people from tyranny when then prove
they prefer tyranny by coming to our countries allegedly seeking
refuge from tyranny in one hand and demanding tyranny be implemented
to their liking on the other? When did we become not the land of the
free and home of the brave anymore? We have become the gutless and
spineless cowards who won't even stand up for our own lives or the
future of our children, our countries, our society and our culture.
What I see in most of my fellow countrymen is defeat. Many don't even
realize it but I regularly hear "what can I do about it I'm only
one person." Only one person, and then only two and then three
and then four until country comes together and wins her independence
on July 4th 1776.
Only to hand it over freely
to tyranny again later in the name of "cultural diversity" or sensitivity.
Some even fight tooth and
nail for rights of a tyrannical religion that they will not take the
time to understand and that will never return the favor.
May 8th 1945 Europe
celebrated the defeat of the fascist Nazis and the return of freedom
from tyrannical rule. In 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 she is watching her leaders hand it
back to them gift wrapped.
The
tyranny I'm talking about giving countries away to is not Nazis this
time but Muslims. If you compare Mein Kampf written by Hitler
with the Quran and Hadith you will quickly find out precisely why
the Nazis and Islam were on friend terms.
Islam
really does come in many different shades of human, including white.
No matter what color they are they all follow the same teachings and
if they truly believe they are Muslim they all want the same things. Make
no mistake, Islam isn't a religion of pick and choose what you
please. Islam is all or nothing according to Islam itself.
I'll
give you that there are plenty of violent and deplorable shitbags in
all countries and of all colors but the shitbags who are causing and
have caused the most casualties since the 7th Century would be Real
Muslims following Islam. It turns out that when you scroll through
their long history, you will easily find that it is utterly soaked in
blood the entire way.
The
first question I would ask anybody who says "not all Muslims are
bad" a single question. Have you read the teachings of Islam? If
you have not read them then how can you claim to know what Muslims
believe in? If you don't know what Muslims believe how can you make a statement about knowing whether Muslims are or are not... anything?
- If I read Mein Kampf and told you that I believed it then
what would you think of me?
- If I did believe that, would it not make
me a Nazi? I think that it would make me a Nazi.
During
WWII it was not the German people who were slaughtering Jews. It was
the Nazis and it was because of the ideas of the man who wrote Mein
Kampf. The interesting differential here is that most Germans hadn't
read that book. Most Germans were living under a dictatorship and
didn't know what was going on. To question too loudly meant you would
find out and wouldn't get to come back to tell about it.
- What happens to people who criticize Islam these days? ... Death
- What happens to people who draw cartoons about Islam? ... Death
- Do you see this happen to people who criticize Jesus? ... 99% of the time, nothing at all.
In
my own opinion, being a Nazi means being an ignorant, blind,
follower. In my opinion there is no difference between blindly
following one evil ideology vs another evil ideology. We aren't here
to talk about Nazis though. We're here to talk about Muslims.
Why
am I even comparing Muslims and Nazis you might be wondering? Well,
let me ask you... what is the difference between Muslims and Nazis?
Can you answer that question? What are the similarities of the two
groups?
Hitler
intended to and came perilously close to ruling the world or at least
Europe. Islam still does intend to rule the world by immigrating to
and reproducing at roughly a 6:1 rate until they become the majority.
There are still plenty of organizations such as CAIR who are
dedicated to making Muslims look like victims no matter what
atrocities they commit and ensuring things stay peaceful until they
do have power. So far they're largely successful and the majority
citizens in most countries don't care to see what's happening.
Europe
continues to welcome these military age men and boys calling
themselves "refugees" and when they arrive they throw
things at police, riot, rape, and terrorize the indigenous population
and then what do we hear about? We hear about "Muslims are so
afraid there's going to be a backlash." Again and again and
again Europe is inviting the mongrel hordes to rape and destroy the
very lands that OUR ancestors shed so much blood for. Our ancestors are rolling in their graves. Sadly as a result of your
actions (European leaders), you and your people may soon be rolling in yours. I love Europe, I am
fascinated by foreign lands and people. That's what initially drew me
to learn about Islam.
I
needed to know why Islam is constantly linked to such things and that
is what led me to find out the truth about what Islam really is.
Islam is nothing more than a death cult. It is a totalitarian
ideology intended to rule and grow wealthy using nothing but greed
and warfare. It is a way to enslave and rule over women and it is a
way to ensure that its followers are well indoctrinated to know
Muslims are the masters and the Infidel may only be converted,
enslaved, or killed.
Islam
isn't a foreign people it is an ideology. An ideology that has been
written in the Quran and Hadith. It can be read so we can see what it
says. People who call themselves Muslims have almost always read
these and know them quite well. If they haven't read them and don't
know what's in them they shouldn't be calling themselves Muslims and
are not considered to be Muslims by other Muslims. If they were born
in the Middle East you can guarantee they know the contents.
The part that I find most fascinating is how vehemently, supposedly
"peaceful" Muslims claim that Islam is so peaceful and
loving and beautiful. Because most people don't see this Muslim being
mean or violent, it is assumed "not all Muslims are bad."
Fair enough initial assessment but if it stops with taking their word for it you are being duped.
I
am going to show you plenty more passages from the Quran and Hadith
and talk about some of them a little bit. Mostly I would like you to
just read them yourself. I've been researching this religion for a
very long time now. I've been watching very closely all over the
world and honestly what is to be seen is a bit terrifying. This is a
subject that may be difficult for some people. Nobody wants to be
called any names let alone racist. I understand that very well. If
you read what I wrote in the intro and still believe this is racist
then I would suggest you read it again.
We
have a lot of problems in the United States and if you take a hard
look at the world as a whole... society is rotting from the inside
out. I could go into all sorts of theories as to why this is
occurring but that is for another time. My point is that we have a
lot of problems.
The
United States alone is unstable as a result of actual/perceived
racial issues having nothing to do with Islam. We have epidemic
homelessness. Veterans who can't get proper healthcare. Welfare
system out of control. Illegal immigration from Mexico straining
healthcare, welfare, schools, etc. Violence and crime rates aren't
low. I could go on but I won't. Now on top of that the Left-wingnuts want to bring hundreds of thousands of military age
men from a violent religion (the majority in all cases) to the United
States. Where presumably they will do what they have done in every
single European country they have already shown up in with arms
extended and palms up.
They
show up in late teens to mid twenties. Some in the thirties and
forties claiming to be "children." More than 80% conveniently have no proof of who they are or their age. Many wearing designer clothes when
they get there. If they don't get what they want they will rape,
riot, make demands of and destroy the United States from within. This
is exactly what they have been doing for many months all over Europe
while the EU demands in the form of a multi-hundred-thousand Euro
fine to the country who denies refugees at a rate of PER refugee.
What could they possibly be
trying to accomplish with this?
Are they accomplishing
exactly what they're trying to accomplish by flooding Europe with
Islamic “migrants”?
If the above is not what
they are trying to accomplish, how do they not realize that this is
what they're doing?
- What are "leaders" like Germany's Prime-
TraitorMinister thinking?
We
can see if we allow ourselves, that they are raping women by the
thousands in Europe!
We can see if we allow ourselves, that they're
destroying things and demanding more in our own countries where they
are guests. We see that some Europeans are afraid for their lives and
this wasn't the case before we let Islam in. We can see that they are
trying to force us to allow them to build mosques where they want.
We can see that the Saudis are paying for thousands of mosques all
over Europe while taking NOT A SINGLE “refugee.” We can see Muslims asking
us to stop serving pork in places they eat. We can see them pushing
us to ban liquor near mosques. We can see them doing these things
with our very own eyes if we open those eyes.
Think
about it and do a little bit of research if you're unsure. Check
various news sources and you'll figure out the truth eventually.
We
can see all of these events that are occurring which are clearly an
affront to the “freedom” of indigenous populations. For this
reason we've decided to give them more, bring more in and give them
some as well. State and National Governments all over the place are
ordering officials to cover up the crimes that we know Muslims are
responsible for. Some of them being quite horrific but we don't
tell you for your protection? We don't plan on stopping the flow any
time soon so enjoy."
Did
you know that there were horrific forms of torture may have been used
in the Bataclan Theater massacre in France? So either it may have
happened or it may not have but we won't know because everybody knows
France has been ignoring the problem for years. Why would you cover
this up?
Don't
the public who you represent, deserve to know what you are doing to
them? In some European nations the governments are not allowing
police to report when crimes are committed by Muslims “migrants.”
Generally they are referred to instead as youths, or usually groups
and mobs of youths in the media. They also enjoy calling them "Asians" which may to some extent be true but overall it's the equivalent of diluting and convoluting the issue by steering blame towards the wrong people. When I think of Asians I think of Koreans or Japanese or Chinese... not Pakistanis, Syrians, Iraqis, Turks, etc... but most importantly the second group are almost always Muslims while the first rarely are.
Now
the Muslims are doing these things in our countries while they are
the minority. Just look at these statistics in the link below for a
minute. Or look at the map statistics shown previously. It shouldn't take long for most of you to form a picture of
what is about to happen in more than a few instances. Muslims are
having 5, 6, 7, or more children compared to the 1 or 2 that
Europeans are having. In a generation or two you will not be the majority in your own countries and then what will happen to you? Sweden is a country of roughly 9 million people. Over 1 million of those people are now Muslims. Now at a 6 Muslims births to 1 or 2 Swedish births, how long do you think it's going to take?
What
will likely happen is what happens in all Muslim dominant countries.
Fact: Islam does not share the need to feel tolerant and
multi-cultural. They don't give a flying fuck about that except that
it makes it convenient and easy for them to walk all over you. They
ask for more free money and call you a racist and they know they'll
get it. A gang of 200 men rape women on new years and Muslims claim
they're worried about retribution and we coddle them.
We're
supposed to welcome them into our neighborhoods and look upon them as
friends while some even appear to look back at us as friends.
Appearance often fails to portray the true beliefs behind the mask.
What is the point that I'm making exactly? Simple, there are a couple
of things that are very important for the infidel to consider. One
thing we really need to start considering more often than we realize, equates to "is this
information that I'm hearing true?"
Does
that not simply scream "I love you friend!"?
Yes, in Islam it is "righteous" to attack and "make war" on those who do not follow Islam.
Believers = Muslims who are
righteous and Infidels are beasts who must be dealt with.
If
you happen to be atheist or agnostic or feminist or
trans-triple-quadrosexual with a twist... Allah does not give a fuck.
If any fucks are given by Allah he does that by ordering you killed.
No trans rights, gay rights, feminism, or any of that other stuff
Americans like. Some of it is certainly very meaningful and
necessary within reason. In reality, some of it is not exactly scientifically
reasonable. What ever your cause is in The West does not matter in Islam. The only thing that matters to Islam has to do with Allah coming first and
being the ruler over everything else man made or otherwise. If that
is not the thing you find most important in your life then by the
teachings of Muhammad as allegedly passed to him from Allah, you are
not a Muslim.
This
isn't up for debate according to Allah (God) and Muhammad (his
prophet). It is as it is, just like it says in the Quran... and it always
will be. Sharia Law is the law of Allah as passed on the Muhammad who
carried out the will of Allah. Muhammad is the person that all
Muslims must aspire to be like as dictated by Islam.
By this reasoning I
personally would ascertain that to be Muslim or to understand Muslim wants, needs, intentions, one must learn the Quran, which is
the direct and final prophesies of Allah (God) as passed to
Muhammad.
- For you Christians
think of Jesus and how you feel about him. He was that guy so you
would need to know how he acted in various situations so as to
imitate as best you could if you want to truly be Christian in
action as well as name?
The deeds of Muhammad are
found not in the Quran but in the Hadith. Considering that a good
Muslim is supposed to want to be like like Muhammad you must know
the Hadith as well as the Quran.
Does the statement above
seem reasonable to you? It doesn't really matter if it does because that's how Islam sees it.
The
Quran is very specific on the things that must (not up for debate) be
done in order to both call oneself a Muslim and to actually be
considered by other Muslims as one of them. For the sake of your
attention span, no offense meant but it's a whole other story, I will
not go into detail about how complicated that little caveat can get.
For
somebody who isn't a Muslim or some manner of scholar on the religion
it is likely they wouldn't know.
Do
you believe there are people who may want to consider themselves as
Muslims while not really knowing the religion well? Of course they exist. Stupid is all around us.
Ask
an Daesh, Al Quaida, and the like to cite from memory Quranic
passages and I bet you would be surprised how much they can actually
recite from memory.
I
can call myself a Senator, a Navy Seal, an MMA Champion, a Christian,
or a Muslim, an Evil Wretch or Honorable and Heroic but do you know
something? I don't get to call myself any of those things
realistically. What do I show up as to other people? Those are the
actions and characteristics I'm portraying that they will see. If I
walk around punching people at the park and knocking out teeth
while insisting that it's how I show love and I mean good tidings it
won't likely end well for me and nobody except the most idiotic among us will believe I'm peaceful and mean well. Yet Islam figuratively walks around
terrorizing everything they can get to and often gleefully killing
our friends, family, relatives, coworkers in horrific events in our
own back yards in the name of Allah.
They're
doing exactly what their god told them. Their god comes before
country. Their god came before their last country and will continue
to come before the new one. They will never be Swedes or Norwegians
or Americans as long as they truly remain Muslims. The laws of
Democracy and current sensibilities in a Judeo-Cristian society
cannot function side by side with Islam and Islamic values which
include Sharia law. No freedom of speech, no freedom for women, no
freedom for non-Muslims at all once they're strong enough to enforce
it. They always enforce it.
What
I am and what I believe in will ultimately become apparent not as the
sound of my own voice spells it out for others to hear but as my
actions will follow my true beliefs and give away my intention to the
alert eye. Don't listen to a man's explanations but watch his actions
to find his true heart.
Does
it ever seem like many Muslims just sort of tolerate our presence at best? If it doesn't I bet you haven't met many.
These
days it's pretty common to hear in the Media that terrorism isn't in
any way connected to Islam. I find that curious considering that the
documentation is available albeit not without a bit of digging, as to
just how many deaths Islam itself is directly connected to going back
to the 7th Century. There may not have been bombs back then but they had the
terrorism thing nailed down since the start.
We have Muslims
smash planes into buildings killing nothing but civilians on purpose
and screaming Allahu Akbar and we say nothing to do with Islam. We
see suicide bombers in France and Belgium, shootings, beheadings and
torture in France and England, Riots in Sweden and Norway, rapes
everywhere and always chanting Allahu Akbar or other tidbits from the
Quran and it has "nothing to do with Islam." Often they
have beards, sometimes they don't, some are extra tan, some are
white, some are black, but all have Islam in common.
- Did you know in the past 2 years roughly, rapes in Oslo, Norway have gone up somewhere around 1400%? That's not a typo. Ninety percent are thought to be committed by none other than... Muslims.
In
more than one country their respective intelligence agencies are
aware of current, potentially threatening Muslim persons to be
employed at airports worldwide. They are aware in countries like
Sweden that actual Daesh jihadis are coming back by the thousands and
will be greeted with taxpayer funded freebies and ID cards and jobs. The Swedish left thinks that letting Jihadis back in and giving them more freebies will fix things.
- I have news for you Sweden, you're an endangered species right now and you've brought it on
There
are Islamic groups such as CAIR (Council for American Islamic
Relations) which is funded mainly by the Saudis who stone women to
death for adultery, behead people, chop off hands or feet, or just
put an AK 47 to the back of your head for other petty offences.
Most
people never hear these things but this information is out there too.
They were established to help fleece you. The Saudis also fund a lot
of Madrassas which is an Islamic school and that's similar to a
Christian elementary school in a lot of cases. Except teaching hatred
of the unbelievers here is a core value.
These
are all over the world including the United States (Virginia for
example) and more than a few have been caught a number of times
teaching hatred of us despite our hospitality and in our own
countries. Their books and learning materials are also provided by the Saudis and Wahabi Islam.
- Note: Wahhabi Islam is better referred to as hard-line or extremist.
At the same time, the majority of Muslim "refugees"
are "unemployable" meaning they have no useful skills, so
they collect our tax dollars in handouts and get political
correctness protection while they suck us dry and mentally beat us
down using our own laws and governments to do it.
Many
people want to believe that somehow these twisted radical types are
going above, beyond, and over the line from what the teachings of
Islam ask of a believer. Why would other Muslims ("peaceful" Muslims)
say this if it isn't true? I've asked myself that as well.
Maybe
they don't know what their religion actually says?
Maybe
they haven't read the Quran or Hadith and it wasn't preached to them
as children because their parents weren't strict Muslims?
According
to Islam, a "moderate" Muslim is not a Muslim.
What
Allah and Muhammad would call these people is unbelievers and the
first rule of thumb is try to convert them if you are able.
I
would classify myself as happily agnostic and there are all sorts of
different and varying belief systems in the United States and Western
Europe. What most of the varying beliefs have in common is that they
don't vary that much. I may not claim a religion and I'm not alone
but if we are what many Westerners consider a good person then we
want to be as kind, caring, accepting, and unbiased as we can and in
more than a few cases all the way to fault. Western culture says
we're all equal, free (more or less) to do whatever we peacefully and
lawfully please. Hopefully in addition to that we try our best to
respect others and would prefer a peaceful and happy world where everybody
got along. Believe it or not there are people out there who don't want that for you. They don't care what you want and they don't care what happens to you as long as they get what they want.
The
problem is that we're humans and we stick to our beliefs like
superglue. Imagine trying to tell a 22 year old Syrian that
everything he knows about how he is supposed to live is wrong? The
word of God is what he has been taught as far as he is aware. He knows you're wrong because
he's the Muslim, he has the word of God on his side and you are "pigs
and apes" as you are described in the Quran.
We
need to take a hard look at the very well ingrained belief system
that we're hauling into The West by buses, planes, trains, rafts,
boats, and everything else moving that way. These refugees made up of
mostly men are coming to your countries, allegedly "running away from war" that
their religion started. They are running away from the mess their
own religion created. They are taking the cowardly route by running
away and won't fight for their “moderate” Islam in their own
countries? They never seem to have any problem fighting for their
beliefs in your country.
You can argue that the United States started this or that Russia did in the 80's but Muslims have been killing and terrorizing each other as well as and ESPECIALLY Christians and Jews for well over a thousand years. Nothing at all changed as a result of the West or the East idiotically wallowing in the Muslim shit-holes.
This
has been going on long before America the fat devil or whatever it is
they call us now. We're just Infidels who needs conquering by Islam and according to Islam. We are going to be that no matter what we do.
You've heard "they hate us for our freedom." It sounds stupid but it's true. They hate that you are free to do anything that is contrary to Islamic beliefs and they are going to put a stop to that if we allow them.
These refugees are not coming here with skills and social
drive, ready and willing to work like previous immigrants have.
The
jobs aren't available if they did have skills and willingness.
Instead of fixing their own countries and fighting for what is theirs
they come running to our countries. The countries they so openly
despise and vocalize this hate in our own streets once inside.
They
demand and they take and they terrorize and we excuse them and they repeat. They push for Sharia based concessions from us and they get
them while none would be offered but death to Christians in Islamic
countries for even suggesting it.
Do
you believe that they have come here for a better life at all cost?
Maybe,
but at all cost for them never allowed for the possibility of
concessions to you?
Black
immigrants, white immigrants, tan immigrants might want a better life
with our culture, language, and values, but true Muslims are only
putting up with your values until they can get theirs and if you look
a little bit you'll see a plethora of evidence. Their values are
Sharia Law. Islam and Sharia Law again and above all else. Western laws and
beliefs are seen as toxic rubbish in the eyes of Islam, nothing more
and nothing less.
I
am an American. I know where my family came from in Europe as well
and it goes a very long way back. I love my country. I cannot think
of another place I would prefer to live as far as happiness goes.
Sure, Europe has a lot of great things, beautiful scenery, and nice
people. We have those things too. Europe has a much longer and more
documented and action heavy history. I take great interest in that. I
mentioned that I loved Europe. I really do. I wish great things for
Europe as well as the United States. I have no reason to wish ill
will upon them. Whether they like it or not I am of the same blood they are. I guarantee that I still have "family" in more than one place in Europe. I feel a very heavy connection to Germany, Denmark, Scotland, Poland, and others.
This having been said, the EU is killing Europe. I
don't mean a little sniffle and sneeze, I mean they're swamping the
boat with violent intruders and they don't seem to be concerned at all. I want to
be able to go back to Europe many times in the future. I don't see
that happening because Europe is going to look very different in 20
to 30 years if this doesn't stop right now.
I
showed a few Quran passages previously that related to the teachings
of Islam forbidding Muslims to befriend Christians, Jews, and other
non-believers. I find that unpleasantly exclusionary. When I feel
like Muslims are showing us they're getting antsy for the "it's
us or them" as prescribed by Islam, I tend to have trouble
remaining neutral.
In
addition to not being friends with us the religion also makes some
suggestions that believers should follow and that includes the
following: The religion prescribes that Muslims are not only allowed
but it's strongly suggested that they lie to unbelievers in order to
defeat them or to further the cause of Islam. There different forms
of lying and they all seem to have a very well articulated purpose if
you will.
Let's
take a look at recommended purposes for lying as Islamic teachings
go.
Taqiyya
- Saying something that isn't true as it relates to the Muslim
identity.
That means saying things
like "Islam is a religion of peace" and Jihad doesn't mean
to shoot, slash, stab, burn, cut-off literal pieces of, etc., "it
means a spiritual struggle from within." If you read the
teachings of Islam the truth of these concepts very quickly become
quite apparent.
If you haven't read the
Quran and Hadith then do you believe that you can accurrately say
Muslims are peaceful or violent or anything else?
Now once we've read these
things that one must learn the religion from and understand it a bit
ourselves might you find it easier to maybe “put yourself in their
shoes?”
If they're lying to you
about something not being in the Quran that is in fact there, then
we must ask ourselves why?
Kitman
- Lying by omission.
An example would be when
Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 5:32 (that if
anyone kills "it shall be as if he had killed all mankind")
while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the
next) mandate murder in undefined cases of "corruption"
and "mischief." There also happens to be the inconvenient
part about this being prescribed only for the "Children of
Israel" (the Jews). Muslims themselves have no such restriction
except against killing other Muslims.
Tawriya
- Intentionally creating a false impression.
I know if somebody is an
enemy of some sort and I am planning on attacking him physically or
some other way, do you suggest that I warn him first? Not if I want to win and if I'm going to attack somebody or something then why would I aspire to lose?
History (and common
sense) proves and most people will choose not to reveal this plan to
the enemy.
Appear as my friend yet
almost never defend a non-believer or try to exert the power the so
called peaceful Muslims should have by sheer numbers if you count
the census. They never really try to do anything to "take back
Islam" because they can't. That is Islam and now we're finding
that out as more and more are beginning to forgo peace and steer
toward war with us. They're choosing to do it abroad as well as
within.
Fact
is we'll never know the true percentage of Muslims that actually
would prefer to have us dead.
If
we don't figure it out very quickly and deal with it very decisively one way or another we will find out
in a far more unpleasant manner than simply being called racist. Sure
we can see that at the moment it doesn't appear to be what most want
but still Islam detonates, shoots, and kills civilians like
clockwork. Instead of speaking loudly and helping weed out the
"radicals" Muslims overwhelmingly choose to say nothing at
all.
That does not appear to be heavy opposition posed against "radicals" by "peaceful Muslims."
Consider
If somebody tries to kill another person for whatever reason and you
knew about it and had the opportunity to warn somebody or call the
police and chose not to.
Our
Western laws account for this and their laws account for doing
anything you need to to further Islam.
That
doesn't necessarily mean killing non-Muslims but maybe donating a bit
to a group who does, through a front claiming to help us better
understand why we're just "racist" against those poor Muslims.
Polls
have shown (in several Western countries) an alarmingly high
percentage of Muslims who admit they want Sharia law, in place of our
laws in our own countries and who believe suicide bombing and terror
are acceptable.
- They will not always threaten to kill us but does
that also mean they wouldn't allow it or might even prefer it?
- Are
you willing to take this gamble with your children's lives and/or future?
This is
something that every one of us has to face and consider. Make no
mistake my friends, though bullets don't always fly, there are shots
going off everywhere. They might not be telling you they want to kill
you but they are telling you that they believe and follow Islam which
does in fact tell them to kill you and tells them fairly often. When
you couple this with the people dying in Paris, New York, Boston, Brussels,
London, and on and on as the list will only continue to grow.
Let's
talk some more about the Quran. If you actually read the Quran
you'll notice that Allah repeats a some things. The things that he
repeats should have us take pause because if God feels he must repeat
something then it has to be important right?
You
see, there's one of those fun repeats.
Allah
really hated unbelievers and so did Mohammad. Women didn't really
fare all that well by Islam either. You'll often hear that Islamic
womens clothing is protecting them. It could be, from other Muslims,
but should we consider this to be the solution to protecting women?
Whether you would like to believe it sight-unseen or not, the fact is
that by the teachings of Islam, women are secondary citizens to men
at best. You will become a possession as a woman in Islam, not a
person.
I
personally believe a woman should choose what a woman wears and
should choose it because she wants to not because she has been
programmed to believe she must wear something. Or worse, because
she'll be beaten, raped, or even killed, potentially by her own
family, just for not dressing "appropriately."
Under the rule of Islamic Sharia laws you get to dress like this ladies. If you're lucky.
Just as likely if not more so, under Islamic Sharia laws you will BE REQUIRED to dress like the two photos below rather than the one above. Look at every single country in the world with Muslim majority.
So who's excited to get into their new wardrobe every time you must go into public (with a male relative or husband to act as chaperone of course)?
Again, not my rule, that's the Islamic rule so feminists, take that shit up with Muhammad or Allah, not me.
While
we're here and talking about women and Islam we might as well talk
about slavery as well because to some extent you cannot be a woman in
Islam without knowing slavery. You are one.
Just
so you know, your right hand is the sword hand. So when your sword
hand "possesses something" it means that is the spoils of
war. Muslims are restricted to four wives, but they may also have sex
with any number of slaves, following the example of their prophet who
historically did so as he pleased with quite a number of PEOPLE who
his right hand possessed. In the very first Quran quote below you
will see that marriage for a woman means she is now owned by the man.
Quran (23:5-6) &
(70:29-30) - "..who abstain from sex, except with those joined
to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right
hands possess..."
This verse permits the
slave-owner to have sex with his slaves even if he, or the slave had
been or still is married.
In
Islam this street doesn't go two ways, sorry ladies. They will make
you stay in the house.
Quran (4:24) - "And all
married women (are forbidden unto you) save for, those whom your
right hands possess."
This is not "the woman
you have lovingly wed" but the woman who you now posess.
Don't feel like having sex with your husband tonight? Doesn't matter, you have no say in that under Islam. You'll do it or Allah says the husband may beat you. Not just yell or be mad, he may beat you and take that sex forcefully.
I love this picture below. This is the Left, this is the West. This is a whole other level of fucking stupid! Protest just for the sake of protesting while being entirely too goddamn retarded to have a clue what you are actually fighting for.
If
you simply google rape statistics from Norway, Sweden, Germany and a
couple others over the past few years you will come across a lot of
information about Islamic right hands possessing shit all over
Europe. They are taking rape to whole new levels. Almost like it's a
sport judging by the percentages of occurrence. You kids aren't safe
either. A ten year old boy was raped and left with serious internal injuries
in Austria and got off because "he might not have known the kid was saying no."
- Fancy having your child go through this?
In
far too many cases, our own governments elected by you and I to
protect us are covering it up while the women in friendly "host"
countries are being victimized by the thousands.
I
might have said it in a facetious manner when I mentioned Muslim
hands possessing things but it's obviously a dead serious topic.
These Muslims are bringing a GAME with them from home. I don't
use that term inappropriately either. They consider it a game to
rape.
This
thing that they consider a game is called Taharrush which roughly
translates to "collective harrassment." By collective
harassment they mean gang rape. I can define that if necessary but I
suspect you've got hold of it. These women they are raping by the
thousands as they please are nothing more than infidel spoils of war
for their taking.
After
all, they have conqured you.
They're
in your country, not working, not contributing, not assimilating,
not even cooperating, and they keep being given more.
More
freebies and more leniencies, and more concessions from The West. A
Mosque here, Islamic center there, then a whole neighborhood or vast
swaths of city and then eventually countries and everything you give
them is not "charity" to them but the spoils of conquest.
They didn't conquer with guns. They conquer with our own tolerance
and willingness to commit self-genocide in order to not feel racist.
It
is lawful and good because it was taken from non-Muslims. The war was
against "infidels" and shit ye took in war includes
treasures, animals, girls and women, as well as boys who haven't
reached puberty.
Boys
were used as human sex dolls as well. In fact, the use of the waste
chute of little boys as Muhammad's pleasure palace is it's still
quite prevalent to in Muslim societies. That's funny because the
Koran forbids homosexuality but if it doesn't count as gay if you're
only answering the call of a "sexual emergency" as it's
been called when they raped indiginous young Western boys and girls
in the host countries.
You
may actually recall this past year a United States Green Beret nearly
lost his military career for knocking out an Afghan Police officer
who he learned had raped a young boy. That's not even a remotely
isolated event, it is the norm. Allah is quite alright with this. I'm
not lightly using the term rape either.
Little
girls are not off the menu either when it comes to Islam. You can
marry them off whenever you like (as the parent), say when they're 6
years old as was Mohammad's wife Aisha. Muhammad's wife Aisha was six
years old when they "married" and she was nine years old
when he consumated the marriage.
What's good for the "prophet" of Islam is good for all Muslims.
Those
numbers aren't typos. In America, or in Europe would the majority of
people consider it alright to marry off their daughters to an Uncle
or cousin or any number of other possibilities and do it when she's
8, 10, 12 years old and the UNCLE is in his late 40's? Little girls
in Islam are not people but a commodity to be owned, used, and sold
as one pleases. This is not a value that changes once they arrive in
Western countries and it's crystal clear by how Muslim men treat
indigenous women.
If somebody suddenly placed a
typical American in an Islamic country this would be the norm but
could you consider it acceptable and adapt to it? Could you view
your daughter or young sister like this and accept it as the way things are supposed to be?
How would you feel if
somebody treated your daughter, sister, wife, mother in this way?
Fact: This is how things are supposed to be according to Islam, according to the "prophet" and according to Allah (the Muslim God).
- This doesn't change when they come here.
This
is precisely what has become a major problem in all
of the European countries who have taken in millions of Muslim
"refugees" and "migrants" who were born and
strictly raised under these values. Just look to Sweden if you want
to see how Islam acts when it is still but a "guest" in our
lands, is it not?
The
Muslim slave master may enjoy his "catch" because
(according to verse 71) "Allah gave you mastery over them."
The
message of this verse, which prescribes the rules of retaliation for
murder, is that all humans are not created equal. The human value of
a slave is less than that of a free person (and a woman's worth is
also distinguished from that of a man).
Hadith
and Sira are the documentation of the actions and life of Mohammad. A bit like a biography of sorts, but you'll not read a more fucked up
bit of rubbish this side of Mein Kampf. No I'm not just throwing Mein
Kampf out there like liberals do either. Read them both and compare
them. Different stories but the exact same totalitarian atrocity. As
we all know Nazis hated Jews. As many of us know the Muslims hate the
Jews.
The
thing with the Hadith and Sira and Islam, is that is what Muhammad did in his life and Allah always approved. So to be a good Muslim you must emulate
Muhammad. Where the Quran and Hadith may not read exactly the same is
where the Hadith supercedes the Quran. Keep that in mind.
Muslims
like to regularly point out that "such and such isn't in the
Quran" but it appears to be a common practice within Islam when
looking on from the outside. Sometimes you will find that it isn't
actually in the Quran... it's in the Hadith. Such as women having to
cover up "their modesty" which comes specifically from the
wives of Muhammad and is written in the Hadith.
Sahih
Bukhari (72:734) - Some contemporary Muslims in the West (where
slavery is believed to be a horrible crime) are reluctant to believe
that Muhammad owned slaves. This is just one of many places in the
Hadith where a reference is made to a human being owned by Muhammad.
In this case, the slave is of African descent. Muhammad had African
slaves. A few actually, as many did at that time AND still do. They
had white ones too.
Anyhow
why the fuck aren't "black lives matter" protesting in
Saudi Arabia or Quatar or the UAE? Ohhhh that's right, because the
governments there would disappear them.
Hitler
and the Islam got along quite well. Hitler granted the Grand Mufti
Haj Amin al-Husseini, "honorary Aryan" status by the Nazis
for his close collaboration with Hitler and the Third Reich.
When
I think of peaceful shit I am always fondly reminded of one of my
very favorite Allah quotes.
I'm
sure there's got to be a way to make that sound like a declaration of
peace wouldn't you agree?
Doesn't
the beauty of that verse just make your tiny-black heart swell two
sizes at least?
Quran 8:59-60 -“Let not the
unbelievers think they will ever get away. They have not the power
so to do. Muster against them all the men and cavalry at your
command, so that you may strike terror into the enemy of Allah and
your enemy…”
Quran 9:5 - “When the
sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them.
Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them.”
Slay
is not Sleigh and no idolitors are going over the river and through
the woods. No, it's much less fun than that. Usually a ride in a
Toyota Hilux... that's a Tundra in the States. It probably isn't
going to arrive at grandma's house either but where it's going you're
certainly in for surprises.
The
usual story we hear when the "frightened" new "refugees"
arrive is as follows: "I'm so scared from the big ocean and I
lost everything in my home country. I had to run for my life or DAESH
would kill me. Please, we're so wretched and poor and need your
help."
Now
that paragraph appears to be in English already but that's where it's
tricky because it's not. It roughly translates to.
"Hey, my
cousin already sneaked into your country a while back and he says you
give him all sorts of shit and he can do whatever he wants because
Europe has laws about saying mean things against Muslims even if
they're true. He said, "yeah Mohammad, bring your 3 wives and 16
kids and Germany will foot the bill, I'm not joking dude." So I
decided I like free shit and my country is a shithole (because of all
the white people of course) so I came to Europe to leach off you.
Also we'll need a 200,000 square foot mosque but don't worry because
Saudi Arabia who refuses to take any "refugees" at all,
will pay for it out of the goodness of their HUGE hearts. We'll also
need you to give us all our own houses and free money. Then we are
going to rape, steal, harrass, beat, and otherwise violate the native
populace and you're going to let us do it." Thanks Europe now
fuck off you filthy Kafir, you are lower than dog shit."
They
may not be actively saying it (at least not always) but their actions
are saying it. So you see my dear Watson, all is not as it at first
appears.
Europe,
can you tell me about Muslims alleging that they are abused while
they are actually getting you to completely support their entire
families and create laws that make it illegal to do ANYTHING that
offends Muslims? Dearborn Michigan do you know something about this?
I heard non-Muslim employees were being forced to wear Hijabs at
work. How about Rome? I can't help but notice thousands of Muslims screaming, shouting, and threatening for their mosques in the Capital of Christendom (Rome). Will the Capital of Islam let Christians build a
church? Saudi Arabia says no!
They
come saying "Oh we love America, it is so beautiful now can I
have my welfare check? Where do I live? Where is my car (I want a
BMW)? I also need a laptop, internet, and a cell phone. I'll need
some extra cash too so I can send it to me ma back in Syria. Oh, and
I'll probably need some shit to do. I don't know what, just give me
something else. Don't bring alcohol near me. Do not eat pork near me.
Do not let women out without head covers. Build a special Muslim
youth center or some shit with your taxpayers money and MAYBE I won't
harrass, rape, steal, burn, and destroy everything I come across
along with 500 of my closest friends but I really will anyway because
you're letting me."
The
attitude Muslim men regularly show toward Western people, especially
women, looks really bad to me. If I had to decide what they were
thinking it looks something like this. "You see, my balls this
big (yeah, one actually gestured live on air to show the female
reporter), so big",
The
rest of what it looks like to me would go as follows: "so I took
a wife down on Wilhelm Strasse (that's Wilhelm Street in English) and
took her home to make sex with an entire Syrian town worth of men.
She pretends to hate it but she'll get used to it. Quit being such a
fuddy-duddy it's just a female, they're like 1/6 of a person so
what's your deal? Do you really think I'm going to not rape that
pretty Swedish girl just because you gave her a fucking huge sticker
to wear in the pool that says "don't rape me"? You Infidels
are dumber than I thought."
That
basically translates into something like this:
"In
order to choose a religion other than Islam, Muslims accept that the
person must actually know Islam first. If you haven't been introduced
to it you aren't necessarily responsible for not knowing. Once they
have informed you of Islam and especially once you have become a
Muslim you no longer are excused. If you still choose to ignore Islam
you are now worthy only of death. The
Muslim is now free to deal with you as he or she pleases. It does not
matter if they wish to enslave you, kill you, cut off your right hand
and left foot, or anything else they choose. Your life does not
matter. In addition, whenever that initial-living-hell ends and you
die or are murdered, you will be lost to Islam's version of hell."
It
is also not just highly suggested but as we discussed before,
required that believers (Muslims) must treat unbelievers (the vast
majority of Europeans and North Americans) a certain way. Allah
actually gives quite a few orders on this subject so let's take a
look.
Quran
48:29 - “Muhammad is God’s apostle. Those
who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one
another.”
What
do you think about that particular passage?
I'm
having trouble finding the peacefulness there.
To
me that statement sounds pretty clear. Almost as though it's inciting
violence against those who disagree with Islam?
Obviously
Allah could have said just ignore them and do your own thing but he
did not. He could have simply stated that you should push them out of
Muslim lands but he didn't say that either. They do in fact do that
though. Try to get citizenship in Saudi Arabia. He didn't say
something else though, what he said was to be ruthless.
Ruthless
is defined as having or showing no pity or compassion for others.
It's not a new definition.
You
want to do a visit to see Mecca? Not gonna happen Infidel filth! You
want to take the short path home in Lutton, England past the mosque?
Not going to happen Infidel filth! "We are Muslim Patrol! Keep
away from the mosque!"
Some
are inclined to argue that the Bible did say that sort of thing in
the Old Testament but most now use the New Testament which just so
happens is newer than the Old Testament which so happens really isn't
used so much anymore at all.
Islam
still uses the original nasty shit and the reason for this is that
it's specifically stated that these were the final prophecies of the
one and only god. The Bible, no matter which version you choose, came
before the Quran historically. The Bible considered Jesus to be the
son of God but to Islam, Jesus was but one in a line of "prophets"
ending permanently with Muhammad.
Some
would even argue that Muhammad actually just stole ideas right from
the Old Testament and the Torah in order to write the Quran. These
people may go on to argue that this was done to bring a familiarity
to Muhammad's religion that would be welcomed by the Jews and
Christians. There are certainly some easily recognizable similarities
to be found.
What
it all boils down to is that Islam is the belief that there is only
one god which is Allah and Muhammad was the last of the prophets. The
last of the prophets has told you, the people what the final
requirements for you were as directed by Allah. Any religion that
came before in the eyes of Islam, had some ideas correct but in the
end "here are the final rules" and those who follow them
are Muslims as God (Allah) has directed. Those who do not follow them
must be taught. If they refuse to be taught they will be punished as
the good Muslim sees fit. This is the end of the story. Islamic
beliefs are that these are Gods rules and you follow or die. You
cannot change god's words and you cannot change god's will. To debate
them shows how stupid and corrupt that you are.
You'll
notice that those portrayed as the most "radical" Muslims
show such absolute contempt for civilians in a country they have
never been to? These Muslims aren't "radical" or
"hard-line" or some sort of fringe group making up ideas.
These are the people who have been engulfed in their religion as
their religion absolutely DEMANDS of it's followers.
Muhammad
supported and spread his religion not by peaceful preachings as
Christianity believes of Jesus but by robbing Meccan caravans and
encouraging or forcing others to join him for a share of the spoils
of war rather than death which they would receive otherwise. Muhammad
and his followers stole food, women, land and anything else they
could get.
I
digress. We've previously discussed slavery briefly
but that was largely contained to how it involves women. Now let us
talk some more about slavery in general.
Do your core values make you
a good or a bad person?
What are your core values?
The values you hold most dearly.
How do you believe that you
should try to treat other people?
Do you feel that slavery
should be acceptable?
Does the skin color,
intelligence, or belief system of the enslaved make them more or
less worthy of enslavement according to your values?
Let
me give you insite into my values on this. You don't have to agree
but some people like to know what others think about it.
Not
skin color, intelligence, or belief system should earn anybody the
title of slave and the position that goes with it. In my mind,
enslaving somebody is immoral and cruel and should be done to nobody.
That
tends to lead me to a dilemma when I realize that Muslims believe the
Quran is the truth and Muhammad was acting as instructed by God when
doing these things. I am not going to jump to try to enslave them
first but I also don't feel like it's a very good idea to import this
into my country.
Again,
I personally feel that it seems as though it would be quite important
to know the Quran and Hadith if I want to become a Muslim because
Muslims know they are the instructions on how to live every aspect of
your life.
Do you feel like the Quran
and Hadith are being ignored and desecrated by "radicals"
or possibly is it simply being followed as it instructs?
Did you know that for the
last 7 years of his life, Muhammad was involved in a military
campaign every 6 weeks? That doesn't include small caravan raids and
such.
That's
a busy little bee! Make no mistake, it wasn't Muhammad being
attacked. Mohammad was the attacker. This isn't the Crusades and many
people have ideas as to what the Crusades were but for many there may
or may not be much truth there.
I
will breifly discuss the relevance of the Crusades in a bit.
I
digress once again.
The
Hadith has a few things to say on slavery as well so here are couple.
Sahih
Bukhari (80:753)- "The Prophet said, 'The freed slave belongs
to the people who have freed him.'"
Sahih
Bukhari (62:137) - An account of women taken as slaves in battle by
Muhammad's m en after their husbands and fathers were killed. The
woman were raped with Muhammad's approval.
As
I may have mentioned before, the Hadith supersedes even the Quran.
The next couple which you'll notice do not have Quran written before
them are also Hadith.
All
in a good day's conquest, right ladies of Sweden, Belgium, France,
Germany, Austria, Norway, Denmark, etc.?
Do I think that is funny? Not
at all is the matter of fact. I find it to be perplexing that the
governments of these countries are openly allowing it, denying it
happens, denying that it's Islam if they admit it happens, and
insisting on importing more.
Why do you suppose they would
do that?
Is it true that it's easier
to control a frightened populace?
- Sahih
Bukhari (34:432) - Another account of females taken captive and raped
with Muhammad's approval. In this case it is evident that the Muslims
intend on selling the women after raping them because they are
concerned about devaluing their price by impregnating them. Muhammad
is asked about coitus interruptus.
- Sahih
Bukhari (47.765) - A woman is rebuked by Muhammad for freeing a slave
girl. The prophet tells her that she would have gotten a greater
heavenly reward by giving her to a relative (as a slave).
- Sahih
Bukhari (72:734) - Some contemporary Muslims in the West (where
slavery is believed to be a horrible crime) are reluctant to believe
that Muhammad owned slaves. This is just one of many places in the
Hadith where a reference is made to a human being owned by Muhammad.
In this case, the slave is of African descent.
- Sahih
Muslim 3901 - Muhammad trades away two black slaves for one Muslim
slave.
Muslim slave? If you are
Muhammad you can do as you please.
- Sahih
Muslim 4345 - Narration of a military raid against a hapless tribe
trying to reach their water hole. During the slaughter, the women and
children attempt to flee, but are cut off and captured by the
Muslims. This story refutes any misconception that Muhammad's sex
slaves were taken by their own volition.
You think you are for women's rights etc. etc.? Then open your eyes and look at what Islam does to women. Both Muslim women and especially non-Muslim women.
- Sahih
Muslim 4112 - A man freed six slaves on the event of his death, but
Muhammad reversed the emancipation and kept four in slavery to
himself. He cast lots to determine which two to free.
- Sahih
Bukhari (47:743) - Muhammad's own pulpit - from which he preached
Islam - was built with slave labor on his command.
- Sahih
Bukhari (59:637) - "The Prophet sent Ali to Khalid to bring the
Khumus (of the booty) and I hated Ali, and Ali had taken a bath
(after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to
Khalid, 'Don't you see this (i.e. Ali)?' When we reached the Prophet
I mentioned that to him. He said, 'O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?' I
said, 'Yes.' He said, 'Do you hate him, for he deserves more than
that from the Khumlus.'" Muhammad approved of his men having sex
with slaves, as this episode involving his son-in-law, Ali, clearly
proves. This hadith refutes the modern apologists who pretend that
slaves were really "wives." This is because Muhammad had
forbidden Ali from marrying another woman as long as Fatima (his
favorite daughter) was living.
- Abu
Dawud (2150) - "The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him)
sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of
Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them
and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Muhammad were
reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the
presence of their husbands who were unbelievers.
- So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Quran 4:24) 'And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.'"
- Abu
Dawud (1814) - "...[Abu Bakr] He then began to beat [his slave]
him while the Apostle of Allah was smiling and saying: Look at this
man who is in the sacred state (putting on ihram), what is he doing?"
The future first caliph of Islam is beating his slave for losing a
camel while Muhammad looks on in apparent amusement.
- Ibn Ishaq (734) - A slave girl is given a "violent beating" by Ali in the presence of Muhammad, who does nothing about it.
- Abu
Dawud 38:4458 - Narrated Ali ibn AbuTalib: “A slave-girl belonging
to the house of the Apostle of Allah committed fornication. He (the
Prophet) said: Rush up, Ali, and inflict the prescribed punishment on
her. I then hurried up, and saw that blood was flowing from her, and
did not stop. So I came to him and he said: Have you finished
inflicting (punishment on her)? I said: I went to her while her blood
was flowing. He said: Leave her alone till her bleeding stops; then
inflict the prescribed punishment on her. And inflict the prescribed
punishment on those whom your right hands possess (i.e. slaves).”
- A slave girl is ordered by Muhammad to be beaten until she bleeds, and then beaten again after the bleeding stops. He indicates that this is prescribed treatment for slaves ("those whom your right hand possesses").
- Ibn Ishaq (693) - "Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu'l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons." Muhammad trades away women captured from the Banu Qurayza tribe to non-Muslim slave traders for property.
Their male counterparts (men, husbands, sons who were beyond puberty and many who weren't) had already been executed after surrendering peacefully without a fight.
According to Sharia when a child or woman is taken captive by Muslims, they become slaves by the mere fact of their capture. A captured woman's previous marriage is immediately annulled. This is obviously not necessary if he's killed in battle nor must any special ceremony take place even if the former husband is alive somewhere.
At the time of Muhammad it is important to note that slaves were almost never literally freed. "You do not belong to anybody, anymore and you may do as you wish" was simply an outcome that was very unlikely and uncommon. Slaves at this time were not "worth their weight in gold."
How many people would hate having others do everything for them and wait on their every request? Some wouldn't admit it out loud but that generally sounds good to most of us.
The point is that slaves were rarely just set free even if the master died they often were left to another master. The context that this leaves us with is that the "freeing" of the slave that is talked about is the killing of one master and the transfer to the new master as spoils of war. There wasn't any freedom to be had. Islam is about full submission one way or another.
Over roughly 1400 years of Islam there have been an incalculable number (in the millions if not hundreds of millions) of slaves under Islamic rule. White, black, and every color in-between were happily enslaved and sold to Muslims simply for not being Muslim and refusing to convert. Some were enslaved by Muslims themselves and some were traded to them by other bands of ruffians such as the vikings.
The interesting part of it is that while the vikings have obviously well grown out of that phase and happily settled into suburban servitude for themselves, Muslims still consider it acceptable by Islam to have slaves. Slavery is rife in all Muslim countries to this very day.
There are still an incalculable number of slaves all over the Middle East. Still totally legal where Islam and therefore Sharia rule. Obviously they try not to let this information become readily available to the Western public.
As I said before, Sharia is Islam. The two cannot be separated. One may be suppressed for a time in order to further the cause of the other. I suspect that you remember that little caveaut? For this reason many Muslims suppress their preference for Sharia while convincing us that Islam is peaceful so that we'll allow more Muslims in and allow Islam to grow stronger, faster.
Why don't Muslims stay and fight for their countries against those who are allegedly "highjacking" Islam? Why don't they stand up to those who are "highjacking" Islam in Western countries?
I would venture to surmise that it might again have little to do with the peaceful nature of the people arriving on Western shores and I could accurately do that solely based on prevailing behavior alone.
- They aren't staying to fight because some have come to us to fight.
- It is estimated by MI5 (UK FBI more or less) that more than 3,000 British ISIS militants are currently in the UK and prepared to launch attacks. Security sources say thousands of terror suspects are based across Britain being monitored by MI5 and anti-terror police.
- The vast majority live in London but many are also based in Manchester and the West Midlands. Speaking to The Times, security sources say the number of homegrown jihadists willing to launch attacks in Britain has grown massively in the last two years because of the rise of ISIS.
- Why are they in your country when you know they are terrorists and you are monitoring them so you are able to find them one would assume. Why are they still in your country, free to roam the streets and risk innocent civilian lives?
- Others have come to us with the intention of getting a free ride and pushing Islam deeper into the West.
- Some really have just come here to get a away from war and to actually escape Islam.
I ask you though, do you think that the Islam that the vast majority are bringing with them might have caused what they are running from?
When people die at the hands of Muslims in the twos and threes here and the dozens there or a couple hundred in France alone all we hear is "please don't take it out on Muslims" and "Muslims fear backlash." Should Muslims not fear backlash? The Muslims who are not physically out killing people know just as well as the ones who are out there killing people, what their role is.
This
is why our authorities in our home countries get no help from the
Muslim community in bringing so called radicals to justice. If you
don't want somebody to get caught then don't tell.
So far the overall PR scheme that Islam has working for it would make
Joseph Goebbels so proud. They are succeeding beyond their wildest dreams.
Do you recall that little scuffle (if you will) that occurred in Europe in the 1930's and 1940's?
I know that many of you are thinking "that was hardly a playground mishap or a scuffle" am I correct?
Of course I'm correct or you are historically ignorant in a manner beyond excuse. Anybody who knows anything about World War II knows that it was not happy time in the world.
There were approximately 60,000,000-plus allied servicemen and women who lost their lives to take back Europe from tyranny. I would ask you humbly to sound that number out in your head and then think that each one was a person like you and I. They succeeded but only with colossal loss of the lives of many noble and brave men and women.
- I couldn't do it. She couldn't do it. He couldn't do it. But when I, she, he, and they get together we can do anything.
- Do you have any family members or relatives who died in this war?
- Have you met anybody who fought in this war?
- Do you think that what our leaders are now doing is a befitting fate for the freedom they died for? I don't.
World War II could have been stopped in it's tracks in the early 1930's if the world had cared to act. It could have again possibly been stopped by England if Prime Minister at the time, Neville Chamberlain had acted but he did not. It could have been ended sooner with a fraction of the lives lost if the United States had not ignored the war raging in Europe until late in 1942. The war had begun with the Nazi German rulers breaking their pact with the West and sweeping into Poland, taking the country under Nazi rule in just over a month.
I'm part German by heritage, I'm also part Polish by heritage. At this particular time in history I'm far more proud of the Polish. Check this out.
The Battle of Wizna was fought between September 7 and September 10, 1939, between the forces of Poland and Germany during the initial stages of invasion of Poland. Somewhere between 350 and 720 Poles defended a fortified line for three days against more than 40,000 Germans. Although defeat was inevitable, the Polish defense stalled the attacking forces for three days and postponed the encirclement of
Independent Operational Group Narew fighting nearby. Eventually the tanks broke through the Polish line and German engineers eliminated all the bunkers one by one. The last bunker surrendered around midday on September 10.
Because the battle consisted of a small force holding a piece of fortified territory against a vastly larger invasion for three days at great cost before being annihilated, Wizna is sometimes referred to as Polish Thermopylae in Polish culture. One of the symbols of the battle is Captain
Władysław Raginis, the commanding officer of the Polish force, who swore to hold his position as long as he was alive. When the last two bunkers under his command ran out of ammunition, he ordered his men to surrender their arms and committed suicide by throwing himself on a live grenade.
I don't give a shit what anybody else says... those are fucking heroes, not the fucktarded version of "hero" the media throws at us these days.
Captain Wladyslaw Raginis
It doesn't take long for for a weak people to unite with amazing or catastrophic consequences when properly motivated. The question is who is actually the “weaker” of those people?
Remember that not all people are weak because they are oppressed by an outside source. Some people are weak or poor because their very culture and beliefs oppress them from within. Some cultures have become weak because for so long they felt strong. Now the strength is fading and the populations have fallen into the “it can't happen here” or “it will be different when they feel our generosity” mindset.
- That is simply not how it works. It would be nice if it did but it doesn't.
- What one culture views as kindness, another views as weakness to exploit.
- That is what is occurring across Europe now.
The failure or success of Islam is all the real Muslim cares about. Failure or success is based upon conquering un-believers and always has been.
- The failures of Islam couldn't possibly have anything to do with the nature of Islam could they
Did you know that some historians suggest the Islamic Caliphate was more than thirteen million square kilometers (five million square miles), making it larger than all current countries except the Russian Federation.
They had to keep expanding to keep supporting the armies and territories they took.
Muslims didn't work back then. Muslims had slaves who did that for them. If they didn't keep taking slaves they would have to do something that we might consider to be "productive" in modern terms.
You must understand that the amount of land the Islamic Caliphate had was quite significant during the "golden age" (which is laughable) of Islam. The golden age is what you call it when it's a historical waypoint and you are alright with ignoring the innocents tortured, killed, and enslaved while their wealth was stolen in order to achieve that "Golden Age" of Islam.
Muslims haven't ever actually done a whole lot aside from conquer and enslave native populations such as in Spain and many others and then re appropriate the people to slaves or dhimmis (subservient infidel types) and then take credit or at least try to take credit for things the people they conquered had done.
The second reason that this is so significant is that Allah says "once it has become Muslim land it can never be taken back." Well it has in many cases been taken back. You can see this in the fact that in 1529 was the first attempt by the Ottoman Empire (Muslims... Caliphate), led by Suleiman the Magnificent, to capture the city of Vienna, Austria.
- The siege was the pinnacle of the Ottoman Empire's power and the maximum extent of Ottoman expansion in central Europe.
Thereafter, 150 years of bitter military tension and reciprocal attacks ensued, culminating in the Battle of Vienna of 1683, which marked the start of the 15-year-long Great Turkish War. The inability of the Ottomans to capture Vienna in 1529 turned the tide against almost a century of conquest throughout eastern and central Europe.
Rest assured, Islam hasn't forgotten this and they still dwell on it today because all they learn (in Islam/Sharia countries) is Islamic history and that's basically Quran, Hadith, and of course, how the Crusaders stole "Muslim land."
Their reality and that of the rest of the world is not the same. When they attack it is because Allah said not just that they can but that they must. When they lose Allah gets pissed. Just like slaves, Muslims do not give up their land. Once it is theirs it is God's will that it always be theirs.
If you think they are attacking you because “they're poor” that's true but they don't want “help” from you. They want everything you have including your very person.
They want your country, the wealth in it, and you to live subservient to them in your own countries.
If you'll observe all of Western Europe and some of Eastern Europe who are currently being pillaged and raped by Islamic (mostly men who are conveniently of fighting age) pouring in by the hundreds of thousands searching for the country with the most freebies. I know because plenty don't even notice an issue with saying that in interviews with news sources.
For 1400 years the Muslims have been doing all of the exact same things, no more and no less. Kill, enslave, conquer, and destroy. Allah really preferred the more violent methods of conquer but he was content with simple capture and convert them (if you can) or kill them. Mohammad preferred the same methods. It is a quite easy to determine given the information available, that Al Quaida, Daesh (ISIS), Mujahadin, and on and on,
are not perverting Islam but following it exactly as it was intended to be followed.
Those who disagree can call themselves Muslim all they want, like many Christians call themselves that when they really are just a shitty of a person as any other hipocrite. The Quran and Hadith are clear that there is no interpretation.
- We can say they don't follow Islam but they do.
- We can say it's not in the writings but it is.
- We keep saying they'll assimilate but they will not. They are not. They are getting more violent as their numbers rise and they perceive you as a filthy slave.
When would you suggest that we deal with this?
It's not so simple as we will deal with it if it happens because it is already happening. Now we only have two real options. We can deal with the unpleasant possibility that it might actually be Islam even though it's uncomfortable and some might not like us for it but we could stop it now. Or we can wait. Ten years or maybe 20, if you're really lucky 30 years you will get to ignore it (somewhat).
- Now I implore you to ponder this question if you've not already. What happens then?
- How does one accept these requirements of a Muslim under Islam and still argue this is peaceful?
- How does one follow these "requirements" (you don't pick and choose or you aren't Muslim) and still be what an honestly quite liberal Western Culture would consider a good person.
Not all Muslims are bad they say. I would ask you to consider what you think of somebody who believes these things?
So is it that not all Muslims are bad or maybe is it that all Muslims are indeed bad if not specifically, physically violent?
Weren't all Nazi's
bad?
All those people who
believed in the "Final Solution" were shitty fucking
people if you ask me.
If you take a close look
you'll find that not all Nazi's were "Aryan" as well.
If you'll look again you'll
see not all Muslims have brown or darker skin. Islam is not a race
but an Ideology like Nazism.
There is no mistaking in the
Quran and Hadith as what is to be done with the Infidels, Kafir,
Jews, Christians (people of the book).
Prophet Muhammad said that "when the Muslims fight the Jews, each and every stone and tree will say: “Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.” The only exception is the gharqad tree, which is one of the trees of the Jews, and if they hide behind it, it will not reveal their presence. According to reports "of Muslims" who went there and saw it with their own eyes, Jews plant gharqad trees around their homes, so that when the fighting begins, they can hide behind them. They are not man enough to stand and fight you."
The thing is that when Nazis said kill all the Jews all the not-Nazi's, Jews, and ALL good people of the world stood together and said NO! The Nazi's replied back with something of a "we don't really care what you want, we're better."
Back then the people weren't politically correct to the point that reality was lost. So they went over there and killed a lot of Nazis! And lot's of not-really-Nazis-so-much. And lot's of civilian types too.
We went in being quite nasty and and we won! Do you see it? That doesn't work. They told us so. They regularly tell us this method that worked over and over again historically does not work. Yet it does, but it's not nice.
- Well what if somebody who's really not nice doesn't care to be nice and decides to kill you?
It seems that our modern philosophies would say you give them a hug and hope that's not a knife he's reaching for.
The crybaby left are quite sure that it's working.
You have to win hearts and minds to win a war. You have to send ground troops into the kill zone with orders not to shoot until you get shot and give lots of hugs and lolli's and we have been there since 2001 with only stalemate and a lot of good men and women who have died to bring peace to heathins who don't want it.
- How isn't this shit working because it would appear to be the perfect fucking plan!?
Anyhow. Let's assume for the sake of argument that all this shit I quoted from the Quran and Hadith are actually in the Quran and Hadith. Now, I have read them and I understand what they say. Knowing what I now know about Islam I proceed to say how beautiful and peaceful it is.
- How does one make this sound beautiful and peaceful?
- If I believe this stuff and become a Muslim do YOU CONSIDER ME to be a good person?
Remember! In Islam you CANNOT pick and choose which parts you like to follow and call yourself a Muslim. These people are just "useful idiots" for those who represent the real problem and those people are real Muslims following their teachings as intended. It's important that you think about this. We are presented with a very serious set of choices that could result in a serious change in lifestyle for a lot of people very soon. Consider it. If you're in Europe... I'm so sorry, when you become outnumbered in a few years... I'm so sorry but at this point I simply hope Americans... Watch and learn.
Many of you wonder why I'm so concerned with Europe no doubt? Some of you may have figured it out. Again, I've been to Europe. Again, I am American but my blood is of Europe. I've to some wonderful and beautiful countries that maybe some haven't been lucky enough to see. I love Europe and I feel a kinship with many Europeans. I remember my trips to Germany, Austria, Netherlands, France, they were all beautiful and amazing countries that I'll always treasure having been fortunate enough to visit under the circumstances that I had. They are without question, some of the happiest times of my life.
Sadly, part of what I'm happy about is that I got to see where I came from while t
hat's still possible.
You may have noticed that I have a lot to say on this matter and some might suggest that I spend a lot of time trying to puzzle together what is happening in Europe. I do this because I love Europe. I may not like the opinions of their politicians and the decisions the leaders make which is what most of you and I are regularly fed. I get that though. Do most of us really think that our government still in any way actually represents and I emphasize represents, you and I, "the people." I don't like our politicians either. I will admit if you ask me though, the German people were so, so nice. We came across a few cunts in France (hell, one of them was American (stereotypical). Overall, if you ask me, I think America has every bit as many twats who call themselves Americans as France does twats who call themselves French.
I implore Europeans to stand up. Stand up for yourselves and your beliefs and stand up for your neighbors. Do not allow your beautiful countries to be taken and destroyed at the hands of morons and shitty politicians. Fight with votes, fight with protests, fight with anything you can before the only thing you have left to fight with is your very lives!
Much of Europe had great prosperity in the recent past decades and as a result of it they got wealthy. Being both very welthy and very generous and nice people (in some cases feeling guilty and trying to make up for a shameful history) they created impossible to sustain welfare systems. Now they're pumping hundreds of thousands of hostiles who do not reason or follow a morality that we do, while the gentle people and the hostils to get along.
- Are the gentle and peaceful people really expected to come out victorious? The answer is always no.
- Do you think doing nothing is an option? Again the answer is no.
Economically, The United States could probably survive as a country totally independent from the rest of the world but it wouldn't be a very nice existence and nothing like you and I now enjoy. If Europe falls, and trust me, it's closer than you think. Our way of life falls with it.
- When I say Europe I mean the individual European countries and NOT the EU. The best thing for Europe right now and the world would be the total collapse of the EU and their rampant idiocy.
- To those in the UK I say Great Job! Leaving that retarded establishment was the very best thing you could do! Now take back your country!
Honestly speaking, what happens in Europe usually ends up coming here as well because we never actually do contain it whether it's simply a bad idea or a catastrophic plan. It doesn't matter if it's a deadly disease outbreak where we have people flying in and out freely with Ebola as long as they verbally say "I don't have a caugh." Because it would be "racist" to stop them since they're black, or going to help blacks. Not a good idea, not logical, not the intelligent thing to do... "racist."
I'm watching this violent ideology Blitzkreig across Europe once again using totally different but equally effective tactics because our own "tolerance" and quest to be the most tolerant in all the land is killing us. It's killing Europe and it will come for us in the United States... Just look at Dearbornistan, Michigan.
In order to give you a bit more knowledge of the Crusades I have to give you a timeline. You don't need to memorize any of it just scan through the years.
Muhammad was born in Mecca and died in Medina in what is now Saudi Arabia in the year 632 AD. Muslim conquest began in roughly 615 AD.
615: Muhammad invited the
Hashimites to adopt Islam.
615: Persecution of Muslims
by the Quaraish in Mecca intensified and a group of Muslims leave
for Abyssinia (modern Ethiopia).
621: Abu Jahl became leader
of a mounting opposition to Muslims in Mecca and organized a boycott
of merchants in Mohammad's clan, the Hashim.
622: About 75 converts from
Medina took the two Pledges of al-Aqaba, professing to Islam and to
protect Muhammad from all danger.
622: The Hijra: emigration of
Muhammad and his followers to Yathrib (now: Madinat al-Nabi, "the
city of the Prophet," or simply, al-Madina). Foundation of the
first Islamic community; social and economic reforms. Starting point
of the Islamic calendar.
624: Muhammad broke with his
Jewish supporters because they refused to recognize him as a prophet
and adopt Isalm. He chose now to emphasize the Arabness of the new
religion and has his followers face Mecca when praying instead of
Jerusalem. In the end, all the Jews were either banished or
executed.
March 15, 624: At the Battle
of Abdr, Muhammad and his followers defeated an army from Mecca.
Muhammad's chief rival in Mecca, Abu Jahl, was executed.
627: Meccan leader Abu Sufyan
(c. 567 - c. 655) laid siege to Muhammad's forces in Medina during
the battle of the Trench. Even with 10,000 men he was unsuccessful
for the 15 days he was there. Muhammad suspected the Banu Quraiza
Jews of helping the Meccans and had all the men killed.
627: A confederation was
created between Muhammad's followers in Mecca and the eight Arab
clains in Medina with the Constitution of Medina.
628: Muhammad led about 1,600
men on a pilgrimage to Mecca where their passage was blocked by
citizens of Mecca. Fortunately they agreed to negotiate with
Muhammad and then later agreed to the Pact of Hudaibiya, ending
hostilities and allowing for Muslim pilgrimages.
629: Muhammad dissolved the
Pact of Hudaibiya and prepared to attack Mecca.
630: An army of 30,000 Muslims
marched on Mecca which surrendered with little resistance. Muhammad
took control of the city and made it the spiritual center of Islam.
Remember
that the last sevaral years of his life were spent waging war on
others and that was in this time period.
The
first Crusade took place from 1095 to 1099. Islam had begun sweeping
across Europe and eventually taking the areas shown below under
Muslim rule
This
is Europe as it looks at the moment and in no way accounting for
Islamic immigration.
If
you'll note This Link and photo below you will see where the Muslim
conquest battles took place and where the Crusader battles took
place. The Crusaders were sent in by the Popes in order to take back
what has previously been Christian lands after they were snatched by
Islam.
Muslim
history on this subject is very, very different as I previously stated. Remember I said
before, once the land is taken by Islam, according to Islam it is Gods will and must never be allowed to be taken back.
All land is supposed to go to Allah which means our land, lives, culture and collective legacy are at stake. Now they are "the minority" of a minority and they're still reaking havok. What do we suppose will happen when they are no longer the minority? All you have to do is look at every country that is majority Muslim for that answer.
Remember, everything you give no matter how "insignificant" will lead to something else and something more until you are living under Sharia. You won't see it comming if you don't look close. I've been watching Europe for a number of years now (figuratively) and I'm seeing it happen.
- If we don't wake up and remember that the truth is not a crime we're going to have problems that most of you will find very hard to imagine.
- Logic and reason should be utilized because they work. These aren't things to brush away for a feel good in the moment.
We have lost our senses in the West and it is imperative that we remember that conquest doesn't always require advanced weaponry and that becomes more true when the natives are afraid to offend the guests no matter how rude the guest gets.
Remember this photo?
- Now who is it that we aren't allowed to criticize these days?
This
is happening and it's a very real and more serious problem. We are
heading for an all out clash of civilizations. All of the pieces are
falling into place and the big picture is a lot closer than many
realize. We, The West, is helping them sew the seeds. Depending what
county you live in you will see it in your lifetime. Others kids will
have to deal with it as adults and the majory by the time we get to
you grandchildren will know what happens when we ignore things too
long.
I
for one happen to prefer relative safety and the legality of
defending myself against a homegrown terrorist attack perpetrated by
the government. I'm referring to the governments of any country
allowing Islam into their country. This is like Mein Kampf growing
exponentially in popularity until we have a repeat of the Second
World War. Islam is growing exponentially and migrating into our homelands.
These statistics
are so easy to find I'm really not going to go into that. Europe is taking away the
rights of her citizens in favor of protecting a very violent and
hateful religion. As they do it they flood the country with
"migrants" and "refugees" who believe and have
been drilled since birth to "Believe in Muhammad and Allah and
only what they say. Everything else is evil."
- This is well documented
as well.
When I look at these events all over the globe I am able to envision EXACTLY what these people, and what this ideology are trying to achieve. Think about that one for a moment if you will. What they want is going to translate to "living hell" for anybody with any type of religion or lack of belief as long as it does not align with the reigning sect of Islam at the time.
This kinda terrifies me a bit and I suspect it does some of you as well. We seem to be the few who see it or are willing to let ourselves see it. What can we do? In my opinion anything. I really would be preferential to nothing. Non-violent would be really great as well but all that matters is that we all try to do something to save our culture and our way of life. Who cares what we each individually do to stop this. Anybody who teaches a friend who teaches another. Eventually if enough people start using the appropriate methods to solve the problem instead of delaying the inevitable.
You cannot mix cultures when both do not want to change. Oil and water anybody? Not all cultures are good and that has nothing to do with what color anybody happens to be. This is solely based upon what that particular culture believes is truth. Whether that truth being arrived at by science in our case or religion in the case of others. Not everybody's "truth" looks the same. The problem arises when we try to treat all cultural truths as equal.
One must generally only look at the state of any given country (the deeper you dig the better you'll get it) to determine if the culture is as a positive one under your standard American, Judeo-Christian values system. Severely different cultures can't mix without one dying off. Islam and Allah and Muhammad made sure to make this very clear (that's one truth I disagree with) which culture it is that has to die. One must give in and eventually fall or simply fade away slowly engulfed in the growing tides of Islam.
We have taught our children to be ashamed of their own cultures. Some teach their kids they deserve more rights for being a minority. Some teach their kids a group needs less rights for being what they are. Some teach their children in Sweden and Germany and even in the United States that you are already lesser as a white Christian. You must give to these groups because your culture is shameful.
That is shameful and anybody who teaches it shouldn't be allowed to teach, PERIOD. If we want everybody to be equal then everybody must be completely fucking equal. That means no special protections for any group. Everybody abides by the same laws, the same rules, the same societal expectations or go live like it's 570 AD in some shit-hole that already has a society like that.
I say America and Americans first and above all else but one must not abandon good neighbors in a crisis. The question is who is going to be left to defend anybody by the time we react?
You (if you is the average American or European) likely believe that peace is preferable to all else. You probably feel strongly enough about that to find it difficult to understand why or how somebody could think otherwise. It's time to take a good, hard, look at what is going on and ask ourselves. Is it so impossible, that this culture based upon the Quran and Hadith and filled with violence and hatred, could prefer to see us dead rather than give up their beliefs for us?
Make no mistake. This is a question that if you don't see the importance of it yet... You will see it soon enough. It might even reach out and touch your family.
Tyrants have no concern for your feeling or sensibilities and you may choose to not to fight and take a life but the tyrant will take yours. If that is the path you choose then I ask you is it fair that you condemn others to this same fate by your choice?
A good way to start is to look at your state representatives and see what their stance on Islam is.
- Have they read the Quran?
- Have they made statements about Islam and what are they?
Don't you think before somebody claims they know what Islam stands for they should first know Islam (Quran and Hadith)?
The inevitable is very clear with the information that we have but we must be willing to take harsh criticism for saying it now because it's only going to get worse.
I hope you have learned something or that this has sparked an interest because we need to stand together against this hateful ideology and stop its advance on our world and our values. Here we stand my fellow German citizens... it's 1932 and we had better think this through very clearly and open our eyes.
I would say that this final quote pretty accurately sums it all up.