Activists Say Joker Obama Is Racist

Abdomination, it's abdominable they way they attack the president simply for being a black man!

Activists gathered outside a downtown strip club Monday to denounce as racist a banner depicting President Obama as the Joker from Batman. "Not only is it an attack on the president, but also on all men and people of African descent," King Salim Khalfani, president of the Virginia NAACP, said of what he called "the abomination that's on the wall" outside Club Velvet. The word "socialism" is spelled out below the caricature.

Apparently the herptified lady parts swinging free on the inside of the club are perfectly fine... No, no, no, don't get me wrong, I'm ok with strippers, some people simply are never going to be able to do other things. At least they aren't collecting welfare. I'm just saying!

Activists said the Joker banner was typical of what they called escalating attacks on the president — from depictions of Obama as Hitler at rallies to South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson's "You lie!" outburst during Obama's recent nationally televised address to Congress. "Racism is as American as apple pie," Khalfani said. "The presence of a president that has African blood is very, very troublesome to many in this country."

It's true, the racism is rampant. I saw a black man the other day and he was in Walmart and the racist cashier told him the machine wouldn't accept his card! It was because he was black. They're picking on him simply because he's black... well, half black. I bet they also said that his wife Michelle looks like Serena Williams and Grace Jones spawned an ugly-ass first lady. Have you seen the size of her feet? They're like a size 14. Oh, I said that... it's true, she's a man beast. Oh no, I must be racist since I said something mean about somebody who isn't the same color as me.

I'm such a racist bastard I'm going to go kill myself now. Ok, I lied, I don't really care, I did that to prove a point. EVERYFUCKINGTHING IS RACIST IF YOU'RE LOOKING FOR RACISM IN IT. The only racist one here is this asshat who's screaming racism over the criticism of a shitty president. Our president is a socialist and he is a liar who is doing his very best to destroy our country and all of our values and that's why he's getting "attacked." I order an IQ test for this Khalfani character. I would be willing to bet glue sniffing mongoloid of anybody's choosing would top his score if he actually believes what he's saying. I'm sure he doesn't though, he's simply pushing an agenda of trying to keep any non-minority groups under the thumb of political correctness until being of said group becomes a literal handicap. So far, it's working. Usually the only people who say things like what this guy is saying is somebody who voted for Obama only because he was black. This guy is too stupid to grasp anything else and from the eyes of one moron, another moron can do no wrong. I hope these "activists" get run over by a train.

Is Your Babysitter A Licensed Daycare Provider?

Communist thugs at it again?

Michigan - Each day before the school bus comes to pick up the neighborhood's children, Lisa Snyder would watch the children of three of her fellow moms for about an hour before they left for school.

This would simply never do.

Regulators who oversee child care don't see it as charity. Days after the start of the new school year, Snyder received a letter from the Michigan Department of Human Services warning her that if she continued, she'd be violating a law aimed at the operators of unlicensed day care centers.

The law says "no one may care for unrelated children in their home for more than four weeks each calendar year unless they are licensed day-care providers."

State Rep. Brian Calley, R-Portland, said he was working to draft legislation that would exempt situations like Snyder's from coverage under Michigan's current day care regulations.

"Situations like Snyder's"... this isn't a situation it's an issue of life for people who have kids.

A spokesperson did admit that the law "gets in the way of common sense," but one has to wonder how such a law gets in the books to begin with.

Now as much as I dislike children, as much as I find them to be vile and deplorable creatures who spread disease and auditory discomfort, I do realize the necessity of such beings. Do we really want to discourage those who are gainfully employed, want to stay that way, and want to have children? What do we get otherwise? Welfare moms popping out more and more, dumber and dumber kids driving the collective national IQ toward zero and America back to a time before man was smart enough to use simple tools. Why would such a law be in place? Simply so "day care" agencies can extort more money out of people who don't have it in exchange for shitty mass produced service.

(i.e. throw your kid in a room with 40 other diseased little bastards and pay them no mind for the next 8 hours.)

This is no different than the union thugs who have helped to bankrupt every other industry they get their grimy paws into. If parents trust the person they should be able to leave their child with any person who is reasonably responsible and willing to care for them (with some exceptions obviously but you get the point) for pay or not. There couldn't possibly have been any good intent, poorly faked or otherwise, in the drafting of such a ridiculous law.

Muslim Call To America?

I'm simply going to quote this one word for word as I found it here. If you read my blog you know already that I take very serious issue with some of the special treatment Islam is receiving in this country. I'm a big advocate of rules are rules and apply to everybody without exception. Islam gets away with murder, usually literally at the drop of a perceived insult. Now this article is going to basically say "they'll make any exception you demand here so come and fuck up their country with your medieval horseshit."

This summer Muslims were murdered in Holland, Germany, and Belgium – four victims of hate crimes.

These murders are just the latest examples of Islamaphobia coming out of Europe. But Europe is not the only place intolerant of its Muslim citizens. Even in some Muslim countries, expression of religion is often perceived as a threat to the secular state.

One of the best places for a Muslim to live is the United States. In a lot of ways, conditions are better here than almost anywhere. As a Muslim not permitted to wear my head covering as a politician in my home country, Turkey, I know.

Think about it: In Turkey, where the vast majority of the population is Muslim, you will not find a lawyer with a beard or a student at a university wearing a head scarf, but you can find plenty in New York City. In Tunisia, you won't see a religiously dressed physician at university hospitals – but you can in Alabama.

In the majority of Muslim countries the government is an intrusive enterprise with eyes and ears everywhere. The result is bleak. Countries reward only sycophants of the "divine" state. Muslims feel stifled by the encroachments of the establishment and lack of religious tolerance. If a man or a woman wanted to organize a protest against the government to gain the right to practice their religion more openly or be politically active against the status quo, may God help him to escape from the wrath of the state.

Many Muslim countries promote homogeneity while their citizens yearn for a right to diversity, which will give them the ability to practice their religious rituals freely.

In America, on the other hand, doors open to accommodate people's religious beliefs. And that, along with citizenship rights and the opportunity to exercise the freedom to practice Islam day in and day out, is what makes the US so good for the millions of Muslims here.

American Muslim women can engage in any sport they choose wearing their religious garment – unlike in France and Italy where Islamic-approved swimsuits, and therefore Muslim women, are not welcome in the pools.

The White House and universities alike host iftars to celebrate Muslims' holy month of fasting. Elementary school students can attend Friday prayers without having to worry about absentee records.

These small but significant examples of freedoms attest to the country's sine qua non of inalienable citizenship rights: freedom of expression and freedom of religion.

That is not to say that the US is exempt from the mistreatment of Muslims. Racial profiling and workplace discriminations sometimes do occur. Yet the difference is when American Muslims face an unjust treatment, they have recourse where they can find justice.

Examples abound: The Justice Department sided with Muslim high school students in Texas who weren't allowed to pray on school premises during lunch break in 2005, when they took their complaint to the federal government.

This year, a judge has ruled favorably in the pretrial lawsuit brought by six imams who were detained in 2006 for "flying while Muslim." This would not happen in many Muslim countries since judiciary bodies are generally under the thumb of the regimes that promote coercive secularization.

Post-9/11, the US did mistreat some Muslims. But today, the Obama administration is making amends by probing alleged CIA torture and by closing the Guantánamo prison. There, after early abuses, officials accommodated detainees' religious needs. So-called Muslim nation-states could learn from these steps in their treatment of devout citizens.

As President Obama tries to mend America's relationship with the global Muslim community, he should promote "democratic" change from within, supporting any push from within countries for more heterogeneity.

Supporting the will of the "people" alone rather than the (semi) dictators, even when it is difficult, could make a huge difference.

Dr. Merve Kavakci is a lecturer of international affairs at George Washington University.

Muslims want diversity? Is that the right to wear the same head scarf as your neighbor? Letting kids out of school for prayers? Changing sports uniforms for hijabs? I couldn't even wear different socks than the rest of my relay team in high school track for fuck sake! Most Muslims who want diversity, like those in Iran, want freedom from the oppressions of Islam, i.e. head scarves and such. Religious tolerance is one thing but religious dominance is the only thing they'll take. There are some moderate Muslims I'll admit. The fact of the matter is that if there were more moderate ones than radical ones they should ultimately prevail and every country that is Muslim should be moderate. This doesn't happen, the radicals always take control of the Muslim community and here is no different.

Muslims murdered in Holland, Germany, and Belgium? Islamophobia!? Really, the fear of Islam is irrational? You're fucking shitting me right? So Islamists are not constantly blowing shit up, beheading, and otherwise murdering innocent people for things as simple as verbal criticism of a religion? This shit is all made up? Free European countries are the bad guy? One thing I'll give these Muslim apologists, who are usually the Muslims themselves, you've got some big goddamn balls. In light of what your comrades do and you can still with a straight face, call others irrational... holy shit!

I'm quite sure I can find at least 10 times the non-Muslims murdered by Muslims recently. In fact, I could trace every one of these cases the author mentioned to retaliation for the prior murder of a Westerner by a Muslim to begin with. Don't piss down my leg and tell me it's fucking raining and don't feed me this "Muslims are good people and can't be safe anywhere" horseshit. The Muslim people bring all of their problems on themselves either by actually committing violence, and making ridiculous demands in our countries that their countries wouldn't reciprocate, or most often simply refusing to do so much as stand up and publicly and vocally denounce such violence. If you want the way of life you had in your home countries, if you want to have rules that oppress normal life and stunt social, technological, and other growth, fine, but you can do it in your own shitty country, not in ours.

I for one am going to stand up and say that crying and trying to pretend you are the oppressed instead of the oppressor does not make it so. A hostage taker can walk right out with the "freed" hostages and pretend he's traumatized and nobody is going to know better if nobody knows what the gun in his hand actually is. The only thing that is going to happen is when the "moderate Muslims" get enough numbers and power in this country the radical ones will step in take control of them like they do in every other Muslim country. No, Dr. Merve, You can take your stupid religion and all the the special exceptions it requires and shove it right up your prophet's ass. What a steaming pile... At some point we need to just stand up and say "we don't want that here."

What The Hell Is Wrong With People?

No, seriously, what in the name of Jesus H. Christ is wrong with people today? We need some goddamn chlorine in the gene pool, that is what's wrong with people. Here are two cases that I read about yesterday that make my blood boil. I can't stand kids nowadays to begin with; hyperactive, disrespectful, overly confident, loud-mouthed, bastards, they usually are. Shit like this pisses me off to no end. This is exactly what happens when you allow just anybody to breed. I'm a staunch advocate of requiring permits and licenses for such things.

A Philadelphia teenager wrapped a cat in duct tape, put it in a shopping bag and left it in a neighbor's backyard.

19-year-old James Davis was arrested on animal cruelty charges. Davis allegedly admitted to taping up the cat from neck to tail after he spotted it in his yard Sept. 21. "Davis then left the cat in his yard for a couple of hours. Because the animal kept screaming, he decided to toss it into a neighbor's yard, where at least 12 hours passed before she was noticed and authorities were contacted."



The gray tabby was nicknamed Sticky by animal welfare workers. It was dehydrated and had to be sedated while the tape was cut off its fur.

Animal welfare workers are still looking for Sticky's owner. Davis faces up to two years in prison and a minimum $1,000 fine if convicted. We all know he'll get like 60 hours of probation, the $1,000 fine, and that'll be that.

Not pissed off yet?

Here's another one for you.

An Australian cat named Smokey survived 13 shots to the head from an air rifle and then found his way home.

The nine-year-old cat turned up on his owners' doorstep bleeding from his head last week, three days after he went missing from the family home in Maryborough, central Victoria. A medical examination revealed 13 pellets lodged in his head and face. Sergeant Craig Pearse said it was remarkable Smokey had managed to get home after his ordeal.

The distressed feline had to be heavily sedated while 11 of the pellets were removed.

Animal welfare advocate Hugh Wirth said the incident was "utterly disgraceful", and that Smokey's tormentors deserved jail.

"Almost certainly these will be young males around about the age of 18 to 20 who have done this," said Wirth, Victoria state's president of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

"It's a pattern that we see throughout Australia and there's only one way to deal with it and that's jail."

I heartily disagree. There is a much better way to deal with it but it is disgraceful for damn sure. I propose the exact same treatment. For the kid who duct taped the cat, strip him naked and duct tape him head to toe then throw him in the park for a week. For the individual who shot the cat with the pellet gun. We decide how large the pellet is compared to the cat's head. Say it's oh, 1/100th of the size of the cat's head, that would be 13/100ths of the cats head worth of pellets. Then we decide how big the perpetrator's head is. 4/5 larger than that of the cat (just a guess) which would mean we need 4/5 the amount of pellets. I propose that we shoot the perpetrator of the crime in the face, oh, 52 to 78 times with a pellet gun.

Radical? Maybe, but this is how lessons are taught. Did nobody teach these moronic douchebags not to do cruel shit that you don't want done to you? I learned at a very early age, if you pull the cat's tail, mom will pull your ear harder, if you hit the dog, mom will hit you harder. This worked, and I think that's what people need. I guarantee crime rates go down when you get punished equally to the crime you committed. You stab somebody once, you get stabbed twice. You shoot somebody twice, you get shot three times. You beat somebody with a stick, we run you over with a bus. The world is half way to hell, the hand basket is traveling so fast it's on fire, and the liberals have a lead foot on the accelerator.

I'll Sue If You Don't Parent My Child!

Human stupidity knows no bounds. Harry Blackmore was swinging on a small steel rail when he fell in the store in Liverpool. Harry's cranium was busted upon the floor causing monkey-boy Harry to swing no more.

His devastated mother was just yards away and totally neglecting to pay attention to her dangerously hyperactive child when the inevitable happened. Harry died at the end of 10 days in critical condition.

The distraught parents, who have four daughters, are now doing what any faulty parent does, suing the supermarket giant for negligence. They told a tale of how Harry knocked himself dead while mumsy was shopping blissfully and completely ignoring her child. The parents simply cannot understand how the store could fail to assign a complimentary personal assistant/babysitter to follow and care for Harry while Mrs. Harry's Mom shopped.

This blogger agrees, too many stores simply don't realize that children are a right of every parent but the responsibility of the whole village. We must all care for every child because not just every woman with a vagina can create one and then let it swing on public property like a chimpanzee on a cocaine bender while she wanders around the produce aisle in the prescription pain pill stupor.

They told how Harry was knocked unconscious after banging his head on the floor of the store in Park Road, Toxteth. He said: "This is a working class neighbourhood with lots of children. We say that parents should be able to go shopping with their children in a safe environment. "We say that the railing should not have been there or should not have been in that state."

This blogger agrees again. There should be no public structures of any sort if they can accommodate a child swinging on them. We must remove everything that a child can hang, swing, or otherwise get injured on so that his/her parents do not have to be burdened with parenting. One doesn't have children to have to pay attention to them, one has children to pay for their old-ass when they retire. Down with Somerfield! Burn them! Burn the witch!

There's a bright side to all of this. Now, with 1 less child, maybe they'll be able to pay more attention to the 4 left. I doubt it, but it was a nice thought.

Hat tip to Rantin Rab for this one.

Obama Stalls As Iran Keeps Building Nukes

Iran says it has successfully completed two days of missile tests that including launching its longest-range missiles on Monday, weapons capable of carrying a warhead and striking Israel, U.S. military bases in the Middle East, and parts of Europe.

State television said the powerful Revolutionary Guard, which controls Iran's missile program, successfully tested upgraded versions of the medium-range Shahab-3 and Sajjil missiles with can fly up to 1,200 miles (2,000 kilometers). It was the third and final round of missile tests in two days of drills by the Guard.

The Sajjil-2 missile is Iran's most advanced two-stage surface-to-surface missile and is powered entirely by solid-fuel while the older Shahab-3 uses a combination of solid and liquid fuel in its most advanced form, which is also known as the Qadr-F1.

The U.S. and its allies (which are mostly imaginary at this point) disclosed that Iran had been secretly developing an underground uranium enrichment facility and warned the country it must open the site to international inspection or face harsher international sanctions. Harsher international sanctions such as a brisk scolding with no apology for up to 60 days.

Gen. Hossein "Big" Salami, head of the Revolutionary Guard Air Force, said Sunday the drills were meant to show Tehran is prepared to crush any military threat from another country. He concluded with "Irka dirka dir, dirka dirka dir!"

The revelation of Iran's previously secret nuclear site has given greater urgency to a key meeting on Thursday in Geneva between Iran and six major powers trying to stop its suspected nuclear weapons program. The powers are confident that if they can simply offer a yet better apology to Iran, peace will prevail.

Alex Vatanka, a senior Middle East analyst at IHS Jane's and part time cashier at Food Lion, said Tehran was conducting missile tests now "to show some muscle, show some strength, and say the game is not over for Iran yet." He noted the upcoming meeting in Geneva. Good call Alex!

"They felt going into these meetings ... that they needed to have something else to bolster their position, and I think that Iran's Revolutionary Guard showing a bit of military muscle here is part of that," he said. He also said to stop in the produce department for fresh California Oranges, pick up Coca Cola products buy one get one free, and if you don't have time to cook, stop in the deli for a fresh cooked rotisserie chicken and sides the whole family will love for only $7.99.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she doesn't believe Iran can convince the U.S. and other world powers at the upcoming meeting that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, as Tehran has long claimed. That puts Tehran on a course for tougher economic penalties beyond the current "leaky sanctions," she said. This means that "allied" countries, most of which do no business with Iran, will begin limiting the basically non-existent business with Iran. The effect is expected to be crippling to the Iranian economy (this blogger isn't exactly sure what "Iranian economy might entail other than missiles). Mrs. Clinton then let out a blood curdling banshee scream causing two elderly Senators to have mild myocardial infarctions and President Obama himself to soil his trousers.

The nuclear site was allegedly revealed in the mountains near the holy city of Qom and is believed to be inside a heavily guarded, underground facility belonging to the Revolutionary Guard. After the strong condemnations from the U.S. and its allies, Iran said Saturday it will allow U.N. nuclear inspectors to examine the (or at least A) site. Which site, has not yet been decided by Iranian officials. The case is looking very strong for the empty lot which once contained the now defunct Irka Dirka Burger factory (96% Halal!).

Israel has trumpeted the latest discoveries as proof of its long-held assertion that Iran is seeking nuclear weapons. Yet again though, nobody listens to the evil and terrible Jews (who have horns and forked tongues) because they are obviously deceitful liars who use Muslim blood to bake Matzoh and are out to control the world through the media and steal the Muslim's sand box from them.

By U.S. estimates, Iran is one to five years away (give or take 11 months) from having nuclear weapons capability, although U.S. intelligence also believes that Iranian leaders have not yet made the decision to build a weapon. Hopes are still high that Mahmoud will join the world circle Jerk. President Obama is still saving a seat beside him for Mr. Ahmadinejad, much to the dismay of the U.K.'s Gordon Brown.

Iran also is developing ballistic missiles that could carry a nuclear warhead, but the administration said last week that it believes that effort has been slowed. That assessment paved the way for Obama's decision to shelve the Bush administration's plan for a missile shield in Europe and with it the hopes and dreams of our (most likely former) non-Russian, Eastern European allies. Obama is imagined to have been quoted as saying "fuck that, planning for the future is for losers, besides, I'm in the process of collectivising the U.S. first."

When asked for his take on these events, the Profit Muhammad, peaces be of him, was quoted as saying "I don't give a shit dude, I just want the Jews dead because they called me a crazy." When pressed for more information he declined saying that he was going to get high and check out some fine ass over at the playground because "it's almost time for recess."

More Moderate, Tolerant, Muslims... Gee Wiz Wally, They Sure Are Good People

Hat tip to Infidel Bloggers Alliance. A few days ago a Christian cemetery was desecrated in Istanbul. Unknown person or persons broke 90 tombstones that bore the sign of the cross and the name of the deceased. The historic cemetery of Valukli is located outside the ancient walls of Theodosius near an ancient Valukli Monastery, the only monastery dedicated to Our Lady still open in Istanbul.



Istanbul’s Christian cemeteries are desecrated on a fairly regular basis. A pogrom in September 1955 saw churches, cemeteries and properties owned by Istanbul’s Orthodox community desecrated and destroyed. Eventually dubbed the September pogrom, the event was the brainchild of Turkey’s political-bureaucratic-military establishment. The pogrom has remained engraved in the memories of Istanbul’s Christians who at that moment realized that their survival in the city would be difficult, if not impossible.

Christian cemeteries in the country are very large and serve as a reminder of the small Christian presence in the country. It just so happens that Christian cemeteries have also become surrounded by human habitation and are coveted by developers. Outraged and grieved by what happened, the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew (pictured) went to see the desecrated cemetery, asking why such acts continue to strike Christian graveyards.

Despite the seriousness of the incident, the local press did not report it. Go figure!

Muslims treat anybody who isn't Christian like inferior, second class citizens in Muslim majority countries. At least Muslims don't segregate themselves and refuse to integrate with societies into which they move that are largely non-muslim... oh, wait, they still do exactly that. Well, at least when Muslims expect foreigners in their countries to conform to their rules, us Westerners require the same of them when they're in ours... oh, wait, we don't, we give in to nearly all their demands.

All I'm saying is treat others the way you want to be treated BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY treat others the way they treat you.

Field Trips For Dangerous Mental Patients

An insane killer who slipped away from the staff of a mental institution on a field trip to the Spokane County International Fair was recaptured Sunday without injury more than 220 miles away in south-central Washington state.

Wait, what, wait, wait, an "insane killer." He's known for being both nutters, AND a killer. Ok, so what does any reasonable caretaker of such a person do? Take him on a field trip to a crowded public place! That seems perfectly logical to me. Fuck it, why not give him a chainsaw? We want to be sure we maximize his fun and relaxation time don't we?

He eventually surrendered to a superior police force but he'll be returning in Halloween 14: The Golden Years. Ok, I made that Halloween part up.

The eventual re-arrest was made by Spokane County Detective Roger W. Knight, who also nabbed Paul (THE SAME GUY) after he gave Eastern State Hospital personnel the slip during a previous field trip.

Now maybe it's just me, but let me get this straight. The guy is an "insane killer" who also has made previous escapes on previous field trips. Ok, that seems reasonable, at least there isn't any cause to not take him on field trips.

There are times when I sincerely hate this country. Ok, I don't hate this country, I hate people in this country. I'm looking at you lefty, crybaby, human rights, fucktards. Yeah, that's right, you're the assholes who get field trips for people who are insane, and who like to kill others. Why does he deserve a field trip? Actually the better question is why is he even alive to take a field trip? For what reason would you endanger the lives and well being of the public at large for the "rights" of somebody who should have lost his rights when he became decidedly crazy, or a killer, or both? Does the public not have the right to be safe from people who are known to be unsafe? Why do we preserve these people who will never serve a purpose for society to commit later crimes? Why? For what reason? Yeah I know, human rights... You don't even understand your own idiocracy if you think every human deserves the same rights. A properly functioning society (which hasn't made an appearance for centuries) gives the herd a trim as necessary to keep things neat and tidy. Sometimes you simply abandon the gimp to the lions for the sake of the herd.

Human Rights Group Doesn't Like Italy's Policy on Migrants

I grabbed this one over at Europe News

The bilateral policy that took effect in May "is an open violation of Italy’s legal obligation not to commit... the forced return of people to places where their lives or freedom would be threatened or where they would face a risk of torture or inhuman and degrading treatment," the report said.

Rome -- Human Rights Watch Monday criticised Italy's new policy of returning boat people to Libya -- where they may face "brutal treatment" -- without giving them a chance to apply for asylum in Europe.

"Italy intercepts African boat migrants and asylum seekers, fails to screen them for refugee status or other vulnerabilities, and forcibly returns them to Libya, where many are detained in inhuman and degrading conditions and abused," the rights watchdog said in a report.

"The reality is that Italy is sending people back to abuse," wrote HRW's refugee policy director Bill Frelick, author of the 92-page report.

"Migrants who had been detained in Libya consistently spoke of brutal treatment and overcrowded and unsanitary conditions," he added.

The bilateral policy that took effect in May "is an open violation of Italy’s legal obligation not to commit... the forced return of people to places where their lives or freedom would be threatened or where they would face a risk of torture or inhuman and degrading treatment," the report said

Human rights groups... HA! What a joke, they're nothing more than communist whiners who won't be happy until there's shit on everybody's dinner plate. Why should Italy let them in, they aren't their citizens they have the right to do what they want with the immigration policies in their country (subject to change as they see fit). The migrants religion is likely the exact thing that is causing the "torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, and threatening their freedom." If they want to leave that at the door it would be one thing but I'm sure they don't. I wouldn't let somebody with the plague into my house either. I hope Italy tells them to fuck off and continues shipping them right back to the shit-hole their belief systems helped to create. Fix your own house if the roof leaks, don't expect refuge in ours when it rains, just because you left a hole in the roof.

Modern Jihad & Culture That Doesn't Defend Itself

The following is an excerpt from a book by Tony Blankley entitled, The West's Last Chance: Will We Win the Clash of Civilizations?

In an odd way, we are in a situation similar to what confronted the American Indians when European explorers landed on these shores. From North America to South America the Indians vastly outnumbered the intruders. The Europeans were not exactly an army and warfare did not exactly break out. Both sides seemed almost friendly and cooperative at times. Had the Europeans been seen as a threat, the Indians could have slaughtered them in short order. Even with their guns there were only a few hundred Europeans while there were thousands of Indians. Only gradually did the intrusion, driven in part by exploration and a quest for trade, gain in magnitude, change in intent, establish beachheads, and eventually, overwhelm the native population.

The Indians lost despite their vast material, numerous advantages, and superior knowledge of what turned out to be a battlefield, because they had no point of reference in their history to properly judge what was happening. Today the challenge for America and the West is to remain alert to the fact that today's Islamist insurgency is something different from anything we have experienced before. For Europeans it is something different from earlier Muslim expansions. Because it is something new for us, our laws, traditions, ethical codes, and concepts of friend and foe have not evolved to recognize and manage the threat.

As the great American jurist Oliver Wendall Holmes wrote "The life of the law has not been logic, it has been experience." Because our law and cultural institutions have not experienced a great cultural insurgency in a globalized, interneted, and biological, chemical, and nuclear weapon filled world. We must consider with cool logic, to what extent our self-imposed, historic standards of conduct are sufficient to protect us from this new danger. Abraham Lincoln said it best "The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty and we must rise with the occasion."

As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew.



Don't find that funny? Neither do I.

A culture that does not stand up for itself in the face of imminent threat will be lost to the sands of time. Will you allow your culture, your heritage, and your very way of life to be ripped from your grasp or will you stand up and defend it? Islam is currently waging a war to subvert those very things we take so for granted and they are using our own hospitality and generosity as well as our very laws in which many Americans have lost meaning. Inch by inch we are giving up the rights for which our grandfathers fought and died. Stand with me, stand up, stand proud, and voice your disapproval or one day you too will be forced to fight not for freedom but to avoid dhimmitude and to secure your very survival.











Sharia Law... Do you really want it here in the West? They want you to have it and they'll give it to you one way or another if you don't slam the door on them.

Robert Spencer Talks About Stealth Jihad

First of all just let me say that I am no fan of Pat Robertson. If this is your case as well do not skip past this simply for that reason. The primary subject of this video is the latest book I posted in hopes that I can get it out there and bring it in front of even more people. In this video, author, Robert Spencer is interviewed about his book "Stealth Jihad." If my review in my last blog was not enough to convince you, take a look at this video.


Stealth Jihad within America's Borders - Watch more Funny Videos

This Should Be Required Reading

I have read well over 100 books in the past year. The only reason the number of books I've read is important is because the one I'm about to tell you about is by far the best. In modern America, in the modern UK, in modern Western societies, this book should be required reading for every citizen who can read.



As I write this review, as I make this plea for those who read my blog to read this book. If you do or have read the book, please help spread the word on your own blogs if you can. There is a war being waged against us and we need to open our eyes and fight back. The war being waged is that of Islam against western society. The front is far more extensive than simple guns and bombs and the stakes are nothing less than the loss of our very cultures and the way of life we lead.

Western counties are daily welcoming with open arms, our very enemy into our respective societies and into our way of life and in attempts at multi-culturalism we are selling out and allowing the destruction of our own society on a clandestine front.

Robert Spencer describes describes the stealth Jihad to introduce Sharia into western society and to pave the way for it's takeover and eventual conquest and rule over Western society. Spencer is a veteran of the struggle against jihad; his previously published titles include "The Truth About Muhammad," "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam, and the Crusades," "Religion of Peace, Why Christianity is and Islam isn't," "The Myth of Islamic Tolerance," and "Islam Unveiled." I have personally read each of these works and willingly endorse them all but this one describes many things the others do not. This is by far my favorite.

Spencer describes in unquestionable and frightening terms how the failure to join the resistance to Islam's malevolent spread in America will eventually lead to our downfall. Some European countries may already past the tipping point and will have some form of sharia law within 50 years. If you don't think it can happen here in America consider the Minnesota taxi incidents of 2006.

One taxi driver refused to pick up passengers carrying alcoholic beverages at the Minneapolis airport because to do so would "insult Islam." Soon other drivers joined the embargo against passengers with alcohol. The city tried a system using different colored taxis to accommodate the drivers who were and weren't willing to transport alcohol, but the system broke down. Within three months 5,400 passengers were denied service. The drivers claimed that they were defending "freedom of religion." In fact, Spencer shows that no one was preventing the drivers from practicing Islam. What the drivers were doing was "asserting sharia norms over non-Muslims." Had the precedent been allowed, what was to prevent drivers from refusing to carry passengers with pork products, or an unmarried couple?

Spencer shows how Muslim incursions into the unalienable rights which Americans blithely take for granted are not a fight for equal rights but a fight to impose Islamic law on the unbelievers in their own respective countries. These organizations reject peaceful coexistence, reject moral equivalence, and reject pluralistic governance. Portrayed as an extension of the civil rights movement in modern Western societies, Spencer shows how it is instead a clandestine movement to impose dhimmitude upon non-muslms and raise Islam to a protected group with rights superseding those of the Westerners who are considered by Muslims to be inferior and are to be treated as second class citizens. For Muslims to live peacefully with us is to insult the prophet Muhammad and is simply not an option for them.

Spencer uses the very documents of Islam, the Qur'an and the Hadith (traditions of the prophet), as well as the speech of Muslim writers and speakers themselves to make his points. Spencer quotes Islam's words verbatim and shows that there is no scope for compromise in the mandate to convert us, extract jizya (humiliating tax on non-Muslims), or kill us. These are their sole options and they mean business. America's very openness, its civil rights, its democratic ideals and institutions, and its tolerance create a vulnerability which Muslims use against us to achieve their goals.

Spencer hails Representative Sue Myrick (R-NC) for her ten point plan to counter jihadist activity in the United States. The Myrick Plan is a commonsense list of urgently needed tools and policies. No rational person could object to a single one of them. So who objects? The Council on Islamic-American Relations for starters. At what point will Americans wake up to the threat of Islamic jihad? When Islamic students in Brooklyn start wearing tee shirts emblazoned with "Intifada in USA?" Guess what? The school principal tried to defend the students' rights to flaunt their violent intents.

Jihadis in America will continue to press forward with their "right" to subjugate us; is it their sworn religious duty. You will either accept their gradual incursions, this "stealth jihad," or you will find the courage to resist. The more of us who are exposed to the thoughts of Spencer and other banner carriers for the resistance, the less effective the jihadis will be. It's your America; keep it that way. Describing the disturbing ease with which stealth jihadists have already become ensconced in the American political and media landscapes, Spencer exposes the full modus operandi of the movement in this Amazing and informative book.

Many will not believe Spencer and will write him off as a propagandist with racist or biggoted ideas that are poisonous to freedom. I implore you to think twice. Erase for a moment all of your past ideas and beliefs and simply read this book with a totally open mind. Resistance to jihad is not bigoted, racist, hatemongering, or Islamophobic; it is self defense against the war being waged against us to take our very freedoms and impose foreign and very oppressive laws upon us. Taking the word of the Islamic world about the intentions of Islam is like asking Hitler to outline proper human rights. This is a wake up call America, we must stand up and we must protect our culture before the roots of Islam dig too deep and destroy us from within.

Anarchy & The Peaceful Religion

I read this one and snagged it from over at Atlas Shrugs so big nod over that direction.

I really couldn't resist because I'm constantly in awe of the peacefulness and restraint of this religion that is Islam. Islam provides such an example of behavioral goals for all of us time and again. Please, read on.

Nine law enforcement officers were injured this past Thursday night in Molenbeek, a suburb of Brussels, when they clashed with Islamic Moroccan youth after trying to detain a youth who had provoked police surveilling the community during Ramadan.

After several days of intentional provocation by the 14-year old youth, authorities went to his residence to detain him where they were met with loud protests by the boy's family. As they tried to remove the boy a mob of approximately twenty people circled the law enforcement officers and started to throw stones and other projectiles. Law enforcement officers had to employ pepper-spray in order to hold off the crowd as they took the boy into custody.

Muslims would never disrespect the law like this. We have never before seen such behavior by this group of people time and again. We know, because they tell us, the Qur'an says to always respect Western authorities and offer friendship and kisses to Kaffir wherever you may find him. It's true, they tell us this.

The family of the boy soon arrived at the police station with as many as sixty people in tow. In short order, the mob became unruly and began to throw stones, smash windows and damage police cars.

Throwing stones! Blasphemous lies! They don't even have a passage in the peaceful Qur'an that gives them permission to bury people up to their waist and stone them to death for adultery! Lies!

Police spokesman Johan Berckmans said the police had identified the 14-year old youth as the individual who harassed and threatened law enforcement officers during their routine patrols of Muslim neighborhoods during the annual Ramadan observance.

During the incident at the police station local law enforcement had requested reinforcements from the Brussels capitol. After the rioters were dispersed, Muslim rioters moved the anarchy to nearby locations.

Law enforcement employed water cannon, a helicopter and approximately 100 law enforcement officers to quell the situation. In all, nine law enforcement officers were injured, one seriously.

The national police union has asked for urgent action by the national government regarding the continued unrest emanating from the Muslim community there. NSPV spokesman Philip Van Hamme said more law enforcement and security personnel should be immediately added to the permanent and preventive services and that preventive patrols should be significantly expanded.

Allow Dillinger to submit a Standard Operating Procedure. This procedure has been developed from extensive studies of various responses and procedures in similar situations throughout history. This procedure is proven to have a clear and positive outcome and guaranteed to work every single time.

Step #1. Muslim riots and causes unrest, taunts law enforcement, etc.

Step #2. Law enforcement officials warn riot causing trouble maker to please stop.

Step #3. Law enforcement attempt to arrest riot causing trouble maker for not stopping.

Step #4. Riot causing trouble maker refuses to go with arresting officer.

Step #5. Would be arresting officer unsheathes large, heavy baton and slams it onto cranium of riot causing trouble maker.

Step #6. Riot causing trouble maker cannot fight back because he got what he had coming to his unruly ass for acting like a goddamn wild animal that he is.

Step #7. Arresting officers throw riot causing wild animal in car and remand him to bottom of local river.

Step #8. Family and friends of riot causing trouble maker attempt to throw stones, break things, and further riot.

Step #9. Arresting officer and comrades open fire on rioting wild animal family with multiple strategically aimed assault rifles thus ending the uprising with a god-like (or Allah-like if you prefer) swiftness.

Step #10. Remand riot causing wild animal family carcasses to bottom of local river.

Step #11. Repeat as necessary

PROBLEM SOLVED. In no time at all, the religion of peace really will be the religion of peace. If it has to be turned into the religion of rest in peace, so the fuck be it. Why do we put up with their shit and let them continue screaming how peaceful they are and how it's their fault as they riot, kill, rape, blow up, and generally cause the destruction of our societies and our things? They live in our countries and use our own laws to further our downward spiral into becoming subservient to theirs. If you pieces of shit want to act like thugs and general uneducated cunts that you are, do it in your mud huts in your own shithole country. Their respective countries are the shitholes they are precisely because of the belief systems they hold. If they want to stay in our countries they should be required to follow our rules and act like human beings. They simply cannot do it it. Islam is incompatible with Western culture, always has been, always will be.

Highly Recommended Book. "Icon of Evil"

A biography of Haj Amin al-Husseini (1895-1974), who was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem during the British Mandate period.

Here is the description of the book on Amazon.com

A chilling, fascinating, and nearly forgotten historical figure is resurrected in this riveting work that links the fascism of the last century with the terrorism of our own. Written with vigor and extraordinary access to primary sources in several languages, "Icon of Evil" is the definitive account of the man who, during World War II, was called 'the fuhrer of the Arab world' and whose ugly legacy lives on today. With new and disturbing details, David G. Dalin and John F. Rothmann show how al-Husseini ingratiated himself with his hero, Adolf Hitler, becoming, with his blond hair and blue eyes, an 'honorary Aryan' while dreaming of being installed as Nazi leader of the Middle East. Al-Husseini would later recruit more than 100,000 Muslims in Europe to fight in divisions of the Waffen-SS, and obstruct negotiations with the Allies that might have allowed four thousand Jewish children to escape to Palestine. Some believe that al-Husseini even inspired Hitler to implement the Final Solution. At war's end, al-Husseini escaped indictment at Nuremberg and was harbored in France. "Icon of Evil" chronicles al-Husseini's postwar relationships with such influential Islamic figures as the radical theoretician Sayyid Qutb and Saddam Hussein's powerful uncle General Khairallah Talfah and his crucial mentoring of the young Yasser Ararat. Finally, it provides compelling evidence that al-Husseini's actions and writings serve as inspirations today to the leaders of Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations pledged to destroy Israel and the United States.

This was an excellent book. I have been seeing the picture of the Mufti with Hitler used more and more often lately. If you have ever wondered exactly who this guy is, you need to read this book. If you are at all concerned with Islam in the world today (you should be), you need to read this book. I learned a great deal of interesting information. There are mixed reviews for it if you look around. Basically what they often come down to is realists promoting it and apologists condemning it. I'm telling you that you need to get a copy and read it through.

Failed Execution... Can, or Can't Try Again?

Ohio is to try again to execute a man convicted of murder after his death by lethal injection was botched earlier this week when technicians spent two hours in a futile hunt for a vein able to take a needle. Veins that could be found collapsed as the needle was inserted, apparently because of past drug use.



Romell Broom allegedly became so distressed that he lay on his back and covered his face with both hands. One of the execution team handed him a toilet roll to wipe away tears.

My opinion: Who gives a shit? Why should I care even a little bit if this was the most terrifying and distressing event he's ever endured? I'm just guessing but I suspect it was pretty goddamn distressing for the 14 year old that he kidnapped, raped, and murdered as well.

Critics are using this as an opportunity to bitch and whine about how the death penalty and especially this case are cruel and unusual and shouldn't be used. They're also trying to say that making a second attempt should not be allowed. The scum of the earth (his attorneys) are attempting to fight another attempt.

One of Broom's lawyers, Adele Shank, who witnessed the failed execution, said her client was clearly in pain.

"It was obviously a flawed process," she said. "He survived this execution attempt, and they really can't do it again. It was cruel and unusual punishment."

In my opinion: I certainly hope he was in pain. He wasn't in 1/10 of the pain he deserved to be in.

I have a very simply solution. Firing squad. Quick, cheap, never misses a vein and if it does, it won't matter the least bit. They should have just stuck the damn needle in the greasy bastard's eye and had it done with.

Why I Hate Other Drivers

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Burning Man Burnt Man?

More general stupidity. Why do we allow this sort of shit, seriously, why?

SAN FRANCISCO -- A man who was burned at the Burning Man Festival in Nevada in 2005 when he threw a friend's photograph into the flames lost a bid to a state appeals court in San Francisco Tuesday to sue the event promoter.

The Court said Anthony Beninati voluntarily chose to take part in a dangerous activity when he approached the burning 40-foot wooden statue for the purpose of throwing a photo of a deceased friend into the bonfire.

A three-judge appeals panel unanimously ruled that the promoter, San Francisco-based Black Rock City LLC, was protected by a legal doctrine known as assumption of risk.

Beninati sought to sue the promoter for negligence in San Francisco Superior Court in 2006 and appealed after a trial judge dismissed the lawsuit last year.

A three-judge appeals panel unanimously upheld a Superior Court conclusion that the assumption-of-risk doctrine protected Black Rock City from liability.

The festival, held in the Black Rock Desert of Nevada since 1990, features the burning of a 40-foot wooden effigy of a man atop a similarly tall platform at sundown on the Saturday before Labor Day each year.

Beninati approached the bonfire in 2005 after the statute and platform had begun to burn and had collapsed. After throwing his friend's photo into the flames, he took a few more steps forward and tripped and fell into the fire, badly burning both hands, according to his lawsuit.

Beninati was the general manager of a real estate rehabilitation company at the time of the festival.

What a colossal waste of time and money. It's a shame he didn't turn himself into a human torch and run screaming off a cliff. Judges not only should have thrown out the case, they should have fined him heartily for being a moronic jackass and wasting the court's time and money trying to bring a lawsuit against somebody for his own stupidity and clumsiness.

When You Refuse To Punish Criminals You Must Punish Everybody Instead

The first “anti-stab” knife is to go on sale in Britain, designed to work as normal in the kitchen but to be ineffective as a weapon.

The knife has a rounded edge instead of a point and will snag on clothing and skin to make it more difficult to stab someone.

Fucking OUCH! Seriously, look at the tip of that thing. Point or no point, you cannot make a knife that isn't going to hurt like a bitch and do some serious damage.

It was invented by industrial designer John Cornock, who was inspired by a documentary in which doctors advocated banning traditional knives.

Mr Cornock said that the knife will cut vegetables, but will make it ALMOST impossible to stab someone to death.

The knife is expected to receive favorable results by the Home Office’s Design and Technology Alliance which set up to research products that can deter crime.

You know what works better than taking all pointy objects from all citizens? Getting the fuck rid of criminals who commit violent crimes! Punishing them accordingly (i.e. execution for murder, attempted murder, etc.) Society is better off without some people.

Really United Kingdom? Banning knives? Now I have heard the whisperings. We're the gun toting nutters who won't give up our firearms. Oh yes, I've heard it more than once and it's often coming from your section. It's true that there are shootings here by violent asshats who get a hold of guns. You are proof that the same categorical crimes don't stop without said guns, people will just turn to skewering one another with randomly selected kitchen utensils instead.

If you still want to condemn us for our want of keeping our freedom to have weapons, I won't hold that against anybody. Just don't expect an apology when I laugh at you because they take away your ability to cut your fucking food. Oh, it'll be next, it still has a sharp blade which they'll soon realize can be used for slashing (see "Islamic Beheadings").

P.S. There will still be sharp pointy knives out there somewhere (i.e. in the hands of the criminals), they just won't be in your own kitchens for use as your own protection. If you take the knives they'll just beat you to a bloody pulp using sticks or rocks instead. It isn't the weapon it's the piece of shit wielding the weapon.

Unleashing The Hillary

U.S. Condemned For Pre-Emptive Use Of Hillary Clinton Against Pakistan

Don't Kill Marcus!

A group of schoolchildren reared a lamb from birth and named it Marcus. They voted and decided to send the animal to slaughter (this was the intention from the start).

A 14-member group of children aged 6 to 11 -- voted 13-1 to have him killed. The decision has provoked fury among animal-loving celebrities, animal and human rights campaigners and the parents of some of the children, and led to threats against Lydd primary school and its teachers.

Around 250 children at the school take part in a program designed to teach them about rearing and breeding animals. The educational farm was started this year, with Marcus being hand-fed by the children. The children also look after ducks, chickens, rabbits and guinea pigs.

The intention had been to buy pigs with the money raised from slaughtering Marcus, but those plans have been put on hold following the furor created by the lamb's culling. The school said the program may now have to be stopped.

But opponents branded it heartless and cruel, with animal rights campaigners asking why Marcus could not have been used to teach the children about wool, and human rights campaigners worried about the emotional impact of Marcus's death on the children.

A popular talkshow host offered to buy the lamb and give it sanctuary and Facebook groups sprung up to rally support to keep Marcus alive. But the children had the final say. The school defended the children's decision, calling it educational.

"When we started the farm in spring 2009, the aim was to educate the children in all aspects of farming life and everything that implies," the school said in a statement.

Back the fuck off you whiny-ass pussies. Let the damn children have their learning experience. It just so happens that we didn't climb to the top of the food chain eating ferns and berries and I don't intend to personally drop off it that way. We need farmers, some of these kids are going to have to grow up to do this kind of thing so shut up and let them learn.

If you don't want to kill lambs and chickens and you prefer to eat swamp grass to survive then have the fuck at it but leave everybody else out of it. I know you think it's cruel and horrible but I think you're stupid and naive. I think based upon that you'll agree that opinion is different from fact. Don't try to control the lives of others, if you want to crusade why don't you go do it in China where they kill animals just because some putz 2,000 years ago said if you grind up it's balls and eat them they'll give you a better erection?

I assure you of one thing PETA. I like meat with my potatoes. If you take away my lamb and chicken and cow meat, I am still going to get it from somewhere. I'll move on to buffalo and antelope and rabbits and endangered dolphins. When you take away those I will eat you if I have to but I'm going to have my burgers and steak one way or another so would you please just kindly fuck off!

Free Up Your Weekends For A Year and Save Up For A Yearly Pass!

PETA wants to rent a prison building the state plans to close and turn it into a chicken empathy museum.

PETA spokeswoman Ashley Byrne said the Norfolk-based group thinks a former prison is the ideal setting for exhibits on what it contends is mistreatment of chickens raised for slaughter. Reiman said the museum also would have displays detailing chickens' habits and intelligence.

I can't tell you Ashley, how long the people have waited for a chicken museum. Who does not love chickens, they're delicious! I hope there are chicken nuggets in the food court, I love sweet and sour sauce! I'm buying a lifetime membership so I can visit every day and cry and cry over the fowl genocide that occurs daily in this, our barbaric country.

Interesting... But Facts? I Don't Know

They used to use urine to tan animal skins, so families used to all pee in a pot & then once a day it was taken & sold to the tannery.......if you had to do this to survive you were "Piss Poor." Worse than that were the really poor folk who couldn't even afford to buy a pot......they "didn't have a pot to piss in" & were the lowest of the low.

The next time you are washing your hands and complain because the water temperature isn't just how you like it, think about how things used to be. Here are some facts about the 1500s:

Most people got married in June because they took their yearly bath in May, and they still smelled pretty good by June. However, since they were starting to smell . .. . brides carried a bouquet of flowers to hide the body odor. Hence the custom today of carrying a bouquet when getting married.

Baths consisted of a big tub filled with hot water. The man of the house had the privilege of the nice clean water, then all the other sons and men, then the women and finally the children. Last of all the babies. By then the water was so dirty you could actually lose someone in it. Hence the saying, "Don't throw the baby out with the Bath water!"

Houses had thatched roofs-thick straw-piled high, with no wood underneath. It was the only place for animals to get warm, so all the cats and other small animals (mice, bugs) lived in the roof. When it rained it became slippery and sometimes the animals would slip and fall off the roof. Hence the saying "It's raining cats and dogs."

There was nothing to stop things from falling into the house. This posed a real problem in the bedroom where bugs and other droppings could mess up your nice clean bed. Hence, a bed with big posts and a sheet hung over the top afforded some protection. That's how canopy beds came into existence.

The floor was dirt. Only the wealthy had something other than dirt. Hence the saying, "Dirt poor." The wealthy had slate floors that would get slippery in the winter when wet, so they spread thresh (straw) on floor to help keep their footing. As the winter wore on, they added more thresh until, when you opened the door, it would all start slipping outside. A piece of wood was placed in the entrance-way. Hence: a thresh hold.

In those old days, they cooked in the kitchen with a big kettle that always hung over the fire.. Every day they lit the fire and added things to the pot. They ate mostly vegetables and did not get much meat. They would eat the stew for dinner, leaving leftovers in the pot to get cold overnight and then start over the next day. Sometimes stew had food in it that had been there for quite a while. Hence the rhyme: Peas porridge hot, peas porridge cold, peas porridge in the pot nine days old.

Sometimes they could obtain pork, which made them feel quite special. When visitors came over, they would hang up their bacon to show off. It was a sign of wealth that a man could, "bring home the bacon." They would cut off a little to share with guests and would all sit around and chew the fat.

Those with money had plates made of pewter. Food with high acid content caused some of the lead to leach onto the food, causing lead poisoning death. This happened most often with tomatoes, so for the next 400 years or so, tomatoes were considered poisonous.

Bread was divided according to status. Workers got the burnt bottom of the loaf, the family got the middle, and guests got the t op, or the upper crust.

Lead cups were used to drink ale or whiskey. The combination would sometimes knock the imbibers out for a couple of days. Someone walking along the road would take them for dead and prepare them for burial. They were laid out on the kitchen table for a couple of days and the family would gather around and eat and drink and wait and see if they would wake up. Hence the custom of holding a wake.

England is old and small and the local folks started running out of places to bury people. So they would dig up coffins and would take the bones to a bone-house, and reuse the grave. When reopening these coffins, 1 out of 25 coffins were found to have scratch marks on the inside and they realized they had been burying people alive. So they would tie a string on the wrist of the corpse, lead it through the coffin and up through the ground and tie it to a bell. Someone would have to sit out in the graveyard all night (the graveyard shift.) to listen for the bell; thus,someone could be, saved by the bell or was considered a dead ringer.

This Is Socialism

I found this in yahoo "weird news" or something of the sort. Apparently it was attributed to "The Sun" in England on the 30th of July, 2009. An interview with a woman and her boyfriend. Simply too goddamn priceless not to post.

Theresa Winters, 36, lives in Luton, England, with her unemployed boyfriend, Toney Housden. She's pregnant (and chain-smoking) with her 14th child (his 12th) and remains totally dependent on public assistance.

Officials estimate that "assistance" has totaled "millions" of pounds. Social workers recently removed the kids still living with her (five were born with disabilities), and Winters told The Sun that, if they also take away her 14th, she and Housden will just keep making more until she gets one to keep.

Housden said he would "love" to go to work, but only for "the right reasons" (specifically, not, he said, to earn money for family counseling because that is the government's responsibility).

REALLY!? Seriously? This is exactly what you get when socialists get control of a country. These are exactly the type of people who benefit from socialism. They are allowed to survive, to thrive, and to breed more who will cost taxpayers more "millions" and turn out just like their useless parents. This is why I am the cynical asshole I am. We have so many people like this in the U.S. it's ridiculous and the Democrats want to pass out more freebies to them. This is why I don't believe in universal health care. Personally I think she should be knocked unconscious, drugged, and fixed as though she's a ferrell cat... and so should he for that matter. Children aren't a right they're a responsibility and if you can't handle it your kids should be taken and so should your assistance checks.

Down With Ourselves! Quickly!

This is the one, this is the one where I lose some of you. It may be in my sarcasm, it may be in the actual thoughts on the matter that the sarcasm is hiding but oh well.

Tens of thousands of inmates may be released from state prison over the next two years due to various prison related issues. When they are, they'll bring their HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis infections with them back to their communities.

The state prison system's health care delivery is so bad, it was deemed unconstitutional by federal judges.

I'm personally wondering why there is a prison health care system at all to be honest.

The Federal Judges decided to do what any rational group of people would do. They ordered reduction of the prison population.

(Maybe it's just me, but doesn't that technically require a reduction of crimes that would land one in prison in the first place?)

Because of cuts to already-slim services for ex-cons, there's no guarantee that the sickest parolees will be much better off on the outside.

This is where the problem begins for sure.

"We want to prevent them from spreading disease to anyone else," said Marianne Gallagher, supervisor of the Neil A. Christie Living Center, which provides services to people with HIV and AIDS in San Jose, including the formerly incarcerated.

(The easiest way to prevent them from spreading it to the population at large is of course to let them out into it, this is a fact. If you take people with poor enough morals or judgment or both to land them in prison in the first place, when you let them out this surely will not continue.)

"It's not a popular population. But they are probably the most vulnerable."

Is their "vulnerability" not self imposed?

HIV is one of the most common diseases among incarcerated populations. A 2000 study found that almost a quarter of all people living with HIV or AIDS in the United States were released from a correctional facility within the year.

If ex-cons don't see a doctor quickly, and miss even a few doses of their medications, their disease can develop drug resistance. "People are not controlling the virus in their own system, then they're passing on viruses that are already resistant to other people," said Dena Dickinson, health center manager at the PACE clinic.

Skipping medication also causes viral loads to spike. This makes it easier to transmit the infection, and makes patients more susceptible to other contagious viruses — like swine flu — that can then spread through the community.

That is an incredible shame.

The clinic is waiting to hear how many inmates will be released under the court order and when before developing a plan to serve them.

Grand! Everybody knows the best plans are always the ones that are not preventative in nature but instead are reactionary to consequences already deep rooted and in full swing!

Doctors and advocates have asked the county to release HIV-positive people with a week or month's supply of medication and during the daytime, when they can more easily access social services. But many people still slip through the cracks. Funding at the jails has been cut like all other county programs, and there's simply not enough staff to monitor release orders on a daily basis.

Go prison unions!

Currently, testing for such diseases is done only if a patient requests it or a doctor recommends it. Several hundred people with HIV pass through the system each year, Chyorny estimates, but he sees only a third of them. A third don't know they're infected, and another third know they're HIV-positive but don't want to tell anyone.

I'm not so sure I agree that telling or not telling should be the individual's right when it comes to a communicable, deadly, disease, with no cure or prevention technique other than knowledge.

That leaves clinics like PACE to treat more advanced illness, and has public hospitals footing the bill for months-long stays.

In other words, we foot the bill.

"Unfortunately, people still tend to wait until they're sick. By that time, it's AIDS defined and it's a lot harder to bring them back to baseline," Dickinson said. "If people get into care early, it optimizes their health and it also contains the cost."

A cost that the public still ends up paying for via various welfare related programs. Essentially this just prolongs their life on the outside giving far more chances to spread the diseases. I'm not going to end with an opinion but instead with a question. What would we do with any other communicable disease that is guaranteed death and easily spread through a population? Something such as small pox or ebola? We would quarantine it would we not? Why is this one any different? Do we really value political correctness more than our very lives and the lives of our children? Is this really the best option for the public and public health?

Handicapped, Handicapable, What Appears As Ignorance At First Glance Isn't So Much

A bank in Florida refused to cash a check for an armless man because he could not provide a thumbprint.

"They looked at my prosthetic hands and the teller said, 'Well, obviously you can't give us a thumbprint'," Steve Valdez told CNN on Wednesday.

But he said the Bank of America Corp branch in downtown Tampa, Florida, still insisted on a thumbprint identification for him to cash a check drawn on his wife's account at the bank, even though he showed them two photo IDs.

In the incident last week, a bank supervisor told Valdez he could only cash the check without a thumbprint if he brought his wife in with him or he opened an account with them.

"I told them I neither wanted an account with them and couldn't bring my wife in because she was nowhere close by," Valdez told CNN.

Bank of America said in a statement cited by CNN: "While the thumbprint is a requirement for those who don't have accounts, the bank should have made accommodations."

Valdez said his treatment by the bank violated the U.S. Americans with Disability Act requiring institutions to provide reasonable accommodation to disabled persons.

So then it's true? Handicapped people are absolutely not capable of committing any sort of money related crimes such as check fraud? There's no possible way that this man could have been trying to commit any crime whatsoever?

I'm not saying the bank was totally right so don't get me wrong. What I am saying is that in this modern world, where identity and money related frauds cost billions of dollars every year, should we really be making random exceptions for anybody, handicapped or not? Sometimes unexpected and unfortunate things happen that point out a flaw in the system. This doesn't mean that the system is totally wrong, it means that no planner is perfect. The man shouldn't have gotten a free pass for not having a thumb. Criminals can be handicapped too and even though I can walk, a man in a wheelchair can just as easily steal my identity as a fully upright walking man.

Football Coach Being Charged

A Kentucky high school football coach was charged Thursday with homicide in the death of one of his players who collapsed at practice on a hot day.

You can find another article here. As though you haven't heard it on every news source already.



A grand jury indicted David Jason Stinson in the death of Pleasure Ridge Park offensive lineman Max Gilpin. Stinson was directing practice on Aug. 20, when the heat index reached 94 degrees in Louisville where the school is located. The 15-year-old Gilpin collapsed and had trouble breathing.

When the sophomore reached Kosair Children's Hospital, he had a temperature of 107 degrees and died there three days later.

The reckless homicide charge means grand jurors didn't find that Stinson's actions were intentional or malicious, said Jefferson County Commonwealth's Attorney Dave Stengel. However, Stengel said, "a reasonable man should have realized something like this could have occurred."

Gilpin's parents, Glenna Michele Crockett and Jeffrey Dean Gilpin, sued Stinson and the five assistant coaches in state court accusing them of negligence and "reckless disregard."

Along with the lawsuit and criminal investigation, the school system has been conducting its own investigation, which was still pending Thursday.

Yet another ridiculous story of political correct horseshit. What the fuck do you people want? Do you want there to be no school sports? Do you want there to be no sports at all for kids? I know you do. You want every sports team to be a laughable joke. My little league coach when I was a kid was a nighmare. The man was rough and he wasn't very nice. I had the choice as a 9 year old kid to either play for him or to play for another (not so good) coach who was known for being much nicer, when I was chosen for both teams. I specifically chose to play for the known, tough, sometimes mean coach. I chose him because he was good, his teams was good, I wanted to be good. I wanted to be the best and play for the best even as a 9 year old.

Yes my coach pushed us hard but we won and we won a lot and that was where the fun is. This shit where no coach can push his/her team for fear of backlash from parents is a perfect example of the pussification of American society. Football is not a nice sport. Football is inherently tough and it is a violent sport. When you as a parent allow your child to take part you take on the risk that something bad may happen up to and including an incident such as this. If you are not willing to take that risk do not enroll your child in such sports. Blaming the coach for something that can and does happen regardless of precautions is criminal in itself.

This is a tragic incident no doubt, but it is not the coach's fault and the defense is absolutely correct in saying that it's nothing more than a witch hunt. This is a tragic sign of the times that shows that the American people in general always want to blame somebody else for anything and everything bad that happens. Putting this coach in jail will not bring the kid back and it won't fix a goddamn thing. Every coach of every sport coaching anybody under the age of 18 should strike until this coach is acquitted of all charges because if they don't stand up for their own they will be helping set a precedent that will be the ultimate downfall of youth sports throughout the country. Enroll your kids in ballet if you don't want them to get hurt... scratch that, they'll probably twist their fragile little ankle and you'll seek the death penalty for the teacher. Just keep your kids at home wearing a padded suit and helmet and never allow him/her to venture more than 7 feet from a predesignated safe zone!

Islam, The Religion of Peace...

Unless of course, you disagree with rape. As long as you ignore the allowable torture and systematic rape of anybody deemed to be an infidel, well, that and the blowing up innocent people for 72 white grapes, Islam is pretty peaceful.

A highly influential Shi'a religious leader, with whom Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad regularly consults, told followers last month that coercion by means of rape, torture and drugs is acceptable against all opponents of the Islamic regime.

The crowd heard from Ayatollah Mohammad Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi and Ahmadinejad.

Mesbah-Yazdi is considered Ahmadinejad's personal spiritual guide. A radical totalitarian even in Iranian terms, he holds messianic views, supports increasing Islamization, calls for violent suppression of domestic political opponents, and, according to the ITIC, "declared that obeying a president supported by the Supreme Leader was tantamount to obeying God."

(Hmmm... who else was that who calls for suppression of domestic political opponents... Oh, yeah, that guy who's trying to pass that health care thing!)

At the Jamkaran gathering, Mesbah-Yazdi and Ahmadinejad answered questions about the rape and torture charges. The following text is from a transcript alleged by Iranian dissidents to be a series of questions and answers exchanged between the ayatollah and some of his supporters.

Asked if a confession obtained "by applying psychological, emotional and physical pressure" was "valid and considered credible according to Islam," Mesbah-Yazdi replied:

"Getting a confession from any person who is against the Velayat-e Faqih ("Guardianship of the Islamic Jurists", or the regime of Iran's mullahs) is permissible under any condition."

The ayatollah gave the identical answer when asked about confessions obtained through drugging the prisoner with opiates or addictive substances.

"Can an interrogator rape the prisoner in order to obtain a confession?" was the follow-up question posed to the Islamic cleric.

Mesbah-Yazdi answered:

"The necessary precaution is for the interrogator to perform a ritual washing first and say prayers while raping the prisoner. If the prisoner is female, it is permissible to rape through the vagina or anus. It is better not to have a witness present. If it is a male prisoner, then it's acceptable for someone else to watch while the rape is committed."

This reply, and reports of the rape of teen male prisoners in Iranian jails, may have prompted the following question: "Is the rape of men and young boys considered sodomy?"

One aspect of these permitted rapes troubled certain questioners.

Ayatollah Mesbah-Yazdi: "No, because it is not consensual. Of course, if the prisoner is aroused and enjoys the rape, then caution must be taken not to repeat the rape."

Mesbah-Yazdi went beyond the permissibility issue and described the Allah-sanctioned rewards (for rape of female prisoners) accorded the rapist-in-the-name-of-Islam:

"If the judgment for the [female] prisoner is execution, then rape before execution brings the interrogator a spiritual reward equivalent to making the mandated Haj pilgrimage [to Mecca], but if there is no execution decreed, then the reward would be equivalent to making a pilgrimage to [the Shi'ite holy city of] Karbala."

"What if the female prisoner gets pregnant? Is the child considered illegitimate?"

Mesbah-Yazdi answered:

"The child borne to any weakling [a denigrating term for women - ed.] who is against the Supreme Leader is considered illegitimate, be it a result of rape by her interrogator or through intercourse with her husband, according to the written word in the Koran. However, if the child is raised by the jailer, then the child is considered a legitimate Shi'a Muslim."

It's not just Ahmadinejad's Iran either. This article published at more than one source a couple of days ago by Fjordman spells out some more Islamic sentiment toward rape. You may find the full article here. I have significantly shortened the article so I recommend going over to the link and having a read.

Fjordman - 8/31/2009

Sweden has the highest incidence of reported rapes in Europe — twice as many as “runner up” the UK, a new study shows. Researchers behind the EU study, which will be presented on Tuesday, conclude that rape appears to be a more common occurrence in Sweden than in continental European countries.

In Sweden, 46 incidents of rape are reported per 100,000 residents. This figure is double as many as in the UK which reports 23 cases, and four times that of the other Nordic countries, Germany and France. The figure is up to 20 times the figure for certain countries in southern and eastern Europe.

My comment: As I have explained in my book Defeating Eurabia, where I devote an entire chapter to explaining the appalling situation in Sweden, Ethnologist Maria Bäckman, in her study “Whiteness and gender,” has followed a group of Swedish girls in the suburb of Rinkeby outside Stockholm, where natives have been turned into a minority of the inhabitants due to immigration. The subjects “may encounter prejudices such as the idea that Swedish girls act and dress in a sexually provocative way or that blonde girls are easy.”

A report from the organization Save the Children told that Swedish girls are scared of being raped, a possibility that appears very real to them. A survey carried out among ninth-grade boys in the immigrant-dominated suburb of Rinkeby showed that in the last year, 17% of the boys had forced someone to have sex, 31% had hurt someone so badly that the victim required medical care.

“It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,” says Hamid, in an interview about a gang rape involving a Swedish girl and immigrant perps. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably f**ked before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity… It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore… girl, I mean;” says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. “I don’t have too much respect for Swedish girls. I guess you can say they get f**ked to pieces.”

These are the explanations that are mentioned. There is no other. Suggesting that it has something to do with mass immigration of alien and aggressive cultures is quite literally banned by law. In March 2007 during a rally supported by SSU, the Social Democratic Youth League, a man carried a sign reading, “While Swedish girls are being gang raped by immigrant gangs the SSU is fighting racism.” He was promptly arrested and later sentenced to a fine because he “expressed disrespect for a group of people with reference to their national or ethnic background.” The local court rejected the man’s free speech argument because even free speech has its limits, and he had clearly acted in a too provocative manner.

Now some of my thoughts. I'll keep this short and sweet.

I will concede to the fact the Islam is peaceful when just as soon as they stop doing just whatever the hell they feel like doing and while standing amongst the carnage they cause they keep screaming violently that their religion is peaceful. Islam is a moronic religion of pure hatred and evil and that is a fact. What else would you expect from people who follow a schizophrenic megalomaniac "prophet" who hatched out a pile of retarded camel shit in the desert? If this religion were any more retarded they would have to offer rivers of milk and dark eyed virgins to get people to join and follow it...

Free Speech Is Terrorism

So basically the Obama thugs are actually willing to say that exorcising our right to free speech is equivalent to walking into a public center and blowing oneself up, or flying a plane into a building. That indeed invokes a whole new type of hope now doesn't it? I think it's quite clear who the terrorists are.

Countdown To Dhimmitude

We already know which side the Dhimmi filled White House is taking.