Why Was This Not National News?

I received this story recently in an email forward. Usually I'm extremely skeptical and don't pay much attention but the simply brutality and the stinking smell of horseshit piqued my curiosity and my anger. For the sake of accuracy I looked it up on several sources and found that it was true and worst of all it was mostly hushed by the media. Nobody I know heard of this story, not a single person, now you tell me why the fuck this was not all over every news source in the country?

Hugh Christopher Newsom, Jr., 23, and Channon Gail Christian, 21, a couple from Knoxville, Tennessee were both raped and murdered after being kidnapped in January 7, 2007. Their vehicle was carjacked and five black suspects were later arrested in the case.





According to news reports, Christian and Newsom had gone on a date at a local restaurant but did not return home. During their night out, the couple was carjacked, kidnapped, bound and blindfolded and taken back to Lemaricus Devall 'Slim' Davidson's rented house.

Their abandoned vehicle was found two blocks away from the house the following Monday. An envelope recovered from the vehicle yielded fingerprint evidence that led police to Lemaricus Davidson. When police went to the address they found the home unoccupied and Christian's body in a trash can in the kitchen.

According to the testimony of the medical Examiner at the trial of Eric Boyd, Newsom was repeatedly raped and then blindfolded, gagged, arms and feet bound and his head covered. In about half of the sources I found his genitals were also cut off. Barefoot, he was either led or dragged outside the house to a set of nearby railroad tracks. He was then set on fire and shot in the head, the neck, and the back.

Christian's death would come only after hours (or up to 4 days, again, depending on the source) of sexual torture. Christian suffered horrific injuries to her vagina, anus and mouth. She was not only raped but savaged with "an object," possibly a broken chair leg, the doctor testified. She was beaten in the head. Some type of chemical was poured down her throat, and her body, including her bleeding and battered genital area, likely scrubbed with the same solution, all while she was still alive, the forensic expert said.

She was then "hog-tied," with curtains and strips of bedding, her face covered tightly with a small trash bag and her body stashed inside five large trash bags before being placed inside a large trash can and covered with sheets. Christian died slowly, suffocating, the medical examiner said.

One commentator explained that "as bad as this crime is, the apparent absence of any interest group involvement or any other 'angle' might also explain the lack of coverage."

In other-motherfucking-words, they weren't going to pursue it as a hate crime!

Police Chief Sterling Owen IV said that there is no indication the crimes were racially motivated and that the murders and assault "appears to have been a random violent act." "There is absolutely no proof of a hate crime," said John Gill, special counsel to Knox County District Atty. Randy Nichols. "We know from our investigation that the people charged in this case were friends with white people, socialized with white people, dated white people. So not only is there no evidence of any racial animus, there's evidence to the contrary."

That is the most heinous and downright criminal lie I have heard in a long, long time.

Newsom's mother sympathized with the "hate crime" position stating, "It may have started out as a carjacking, but what it developed into was blacks hating whites."

And she's absolutely right!

The case also attracted the attention of white supremacists. On May 27, 2007, around 30 white supremacists led by Alex Turner and Hal Turner rallied in downtown Knoxville in protest of the murders. They were met by a larger number of counter-protestors, many dressed as clowns (parodying the Ku Klux Klan).

It's sad when the "white supremacists" and the Klan are the only ones who though they may often be wrong are willing to stand up for what is right as well. As for the balls of the douchebags on the left who are more concerned with calling the Klan clowns than the case at hand. I honestly and oh so sincerely hope to whatever god you choose that it is your parents or your children who have something like this happen to them next. You stupid, blind assholes!

As for the outcome of the trial.

Letalvis "Rome" Cobbins, 24



On August 25, 2009, Letalvis D. Cobbins was found guilty of the murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom. He was also found guilty of facilitation of murder for Newsom. He acquitted of Newsom's rape. On August 26, Cobbins was sentenced to life without parole.

Lemaricus Devall "Slim" Davidson, 25



Faces the same 46 charges as Thomas. Davidson had also completed serving a five-year sentence in Tennessee on a previous felony conviction for carjacking and aggravated robbery on August 5, 2006.

Surely the left will say they can rehabilitate him.

George Geovonni "Detroit" Thomas, 27



Thomas was indicted on 16 counts of felony murder growing out of the rape, robbery, kidnapping, and theft of Christian and Newsom, 2 counts of premeditated murder, 2 counts of especially aggravated robbery, 4 counts of especially aggravated kidnapping, 20 counts of aggravated rape, and 2 counts of theft.

I couldn't find what his sentence was, if one was even passed yet.

Vanessa Coleman, 18



Faces 40 Tennessee state charges. Coleman was indicted on 12 counts of felony murder growing out of the rape, robbery, kidnapping, and theft of Christian and Newsom, 1 count of premeditated murder (of Christian only), 1 count of especially aggravated robbery (of Newsom only), 4 counts of especially aggravated kidnapping, 20 counts of aggravated rape, and 2 counts of theft.

Eric DeWayne "E" Boyd, 34



Was arrested in connection with the fatal carjacking, though not indicted by the Knox County grand jury. Still, Boyd was charged in federal court as an accessory after the fact for helping the suspects evade the police. Later, Boyd was also accused by Thomas and Cobbins of rape and murder, and a search warrant was obtained for his DNA. The accusations did not result in charges.

Boyd was found guilty of being an accessory to a fatal carjacking and for failing to report the location of a known fugitive. Boyd's was also the only suspect not charged with murder. He has been sentenced to the maximum of 18 years in Federal prison.

This makes me so goddamn mad I can barely see straight! If this had been 5 white people who did the same thing to 2 black people there is not anybody who isn't a complete retard who could argue or even think for a second that it would not be labeled a hate crime. This is so absolutely sickening and heinous that there are no words to describe the pure hatred I feel for these people and any lawyer who would even defend them. What the fuck is wrong with our justice system? What the fuck is wrong with this country when the double standard can be so blatant and so ridiculous and the only ones who question it are the radical groups? Where the hell is the outcry? Sadly, I know it'll never come until it comes to an all out race war and if these were my family members I would be on the front fucking lines!

I want to know when the horseshit is going to stop and somebody is going to open their stupid eyes and say "wait a minute." Welcome to hell, you may now exit the hand-basket! All 5 of these people should have been convicted of all the same counts and all 5 should have been executed within a week of their trial. If you played any part in a crime this downright vicious you helped it reach the end result and you should pay accordingly. They all deserve nothing less than to die in the exact same manner which they inflicted on their victims and it should be broadcast on pay per view. Now these fucking animals will sit in prison on the taxpayer dime and some of them will get out and resume their lives... as for the victims?

Until we start treating crime with punishments that exactly reflect the brutality of the crime itself we are telling others like these 5, "go right ahead, the punishment won't be so bad and some scum sucking lawyer might even get you off." I do not wonder at all why this sort of thing continues. It will continue to happen because the left continues to run our justice system. Why don't we punish them with some welfare checks, kisses, and a pat on the fucking back while we tell them it's not their fault because they are from a tough background. No, it's excusable because they are from a protected race.

I Can Fix Our Ailing Prison Systems

I should probably begin this blog with a little explanation of what is motivating me here. I spent a couple of hours last night watching "Gangland" on the History Channel. For those of you who have not seen this show, the title is pretty self explanatory. Each episode generally spotlights a different specific gang. Some gangs in prison, some gangs outside of prison, some gangs spanning both.

After all of that depressing crap documenting the downward spiral of society, today, I cruised on over to itdontmakesense.blogspot.com to see what Nickie had to say and wouldn't you know it, it was about prisons. What it comes down to is that the California prison system is in a real bad way. Many prisons around the country are not functioning so well and the economic situation is not making it any better. Many prisons are severely overcrowded and understaffed and this poses a lot of obvious problems. You can find the article about the California State Prison Mess here. My focus is going to be a bit more broad.

It is true that the justice system in this country is a barely functioning farce where you may get a stiffer sentence for possessing drugs or driving under the influence than for armed robbery, rape, or murder. When somebody does land themselves in prison, the horseshit only gets deeper from there. I'm not going to go into great detail on what our prison system costs, I think for my topic some basics will be sufficient.

Our prison systems are a money pit, plain and simple. There were roughly 2.3 million people in United States prisons as of 2008. That means that approximately 1 out of every 100 adults was behind bars. Somewhere very near 3,300 of those incarcerated were on death row having been sentenced to die but instead soaking up taxpayer money for an average of about 14 and a half years. In order to house and feed your average inmate it costs on average, about 40 to $45,000 dollars per year not including extras and medical problems and such. This comes out to something like $101,250,000,000 per year. Now tack on all the medical issues that are going to occur. Many prisons will employ their own doctors but specialists are contracted out. We all know how government contractors work, think Halliburton. One urologist charged California's prison system $2,036 an hour to treat inmates. An orthopedic surgeon billed the state for 30 hours' work for a single day.

Tell me any of this surprises you? Seriously, would we expect anything less? Should we accept this?

The best part of all this is who is in prison for what. Take a look at some of these:

TYPE OF OFFENSE (Sentenced Pop. Only) - Federal Prisoners

Drug Offenses 59.6%

Robbery 9.8%

Property Offenses 5.5%

Extortion, Fraud, Bribery 6.8%

Violent Offenses 2.7%

Firearms, Explosives, Arson 8.6%

White Collar 1.0%

Immigration 2.8%

Courts or Corrections 0.8%

National Security 0.1%

Continuing Criminal Enterprise 0.8%

Miscellaneous 1.5%

So basically, more than half of our prison population is in prison over "drug offenses." We spend over 50 billion dollars a year to keep people in prison over drugs. Now I'm not absolutely sure what constitutes a "drug offense." Maybe some readers can help me out. My impression is that it means using, selling, buying, not murdering a family while under the influence but I could be wrong. Reading through the rest some of them I'm not sure of like the obvious Miscellaneous category.

What's the point of all this Dillinger? I can fix out prison problems. This is not a difficult issue at all. It may have a lot of parts to it and I may not manage to remember some of those here but I'm going to do my best to point out the most obvious.

First and foremost, you want to cut prison money you need to cut prison population this is true. We legalize drugs. Before you shut me off hear me out. We legalize all drugs and we regulate them like cigarettes or alcohol. All drugs are heavily taxed just like cigarettes and alcohol, this would bring it a lot of money for state and or federal government agencies. This would create a ton of jobs all across the board whether it be cultivating, manufacturing, processing, regulating, and so on and so forth. In addition to this, the illegal drug market would wither and if not die it would be virtually obsolete. Not many people are going to go buy drugs on the corner from some shady fuck when they can buy them in the seven eleven.

Now we've drastically cut crime related to distribution and pursuit of drugs. We've cut off a major avenue of financial survival of the gang element and we've put a severe cramp in Mexico's drug cartel and violence issues because we don't need their drugs anymore. Drugs are bad in many cases, you would create a monster you may be thinking. For a while we probably would but that can be kept under control as well. When you go to the store to buy drugs, whatever they be, you must sign a wavor and your information is put into a database.

Your waver says basically that you will not further distribute the drugs, this would be a crime. The wavor also says that if you do not use them in a responsible manner (i.e., overdose, crimes under the influence, etc.) there will be much more severe consequences than the same crime without drugs. If you drive and kill somebody or cause injury to somebody else you will pay heartily and accordingly. If you overdose you will not be revived, you will be hauled away and straight to the morgue. Insurance and taxpayers will not pay to help support your habit. Overdoses would be drastically cut in the first place by simple regulation. When you bought it you would know exactly what you were getting.

At first you would have a spike in use I'm quite sure, but eventually it would slow down significantly with the loss of the stigma and it would become no different than alcohol or cigarettes.

There's obviously a lot more involved than what can be simply stated here but that's the basic idea. Far fewer drug related crimes, and far fewer stupid hippies getting sent to jail for having a bag of pot in the glove box of their shitty Volkswagen on the way to burning man and far fewer criminal elements building empires on such things.

Next we must punish people according to their crimes. The only way to keep people out of prison is to simply make the punishment so unbearable that even the most hardened criminals fear it. As it is now the criminal element practically runs prisons. Prisoners get cable tv, books, educations, time to work out, medical treatment, etc. Why the hell do we pay for this. Obviously some people can be rehabilitated and should be. Some people maybe could be but simply don't deserve it. We need to figure this out first but I have some basic ground rules.

You will not get any luxuries in prison. There will be no books, magazines, or letters, no paining, no drawing, no nothing to pass the time. You will sit in your cell and think about what you have done or you will be working and working your ass off. There will be no gym equipment, no yard time to run or play basketball. We do not need to build bigger, stronger criminals who are in better (more dangerous) condition than when you went in. You will get no television at all, none! You will live in a cell that is barely big enough to house a single inmate, his bed and his toilet and that is it, you get nothing else. Meals will be just enough to keep you alive and nothing more. No dessert, no Sunday special meals, just meat, potatoes, and a piece of bread. If you qualify, meaning your first time in prison and it did not involve a heinous crime such as murder, rape, molestation, you can qualify for an education and attempted rehab. There should be no air conditioning and no heat. Make no mistake, if you go to prison, you will suffer.

As far as the above mentioned heinous crimes, I have a solution for this as well. If you commit pre-meditated murder you will die. No fancy methods either, if you take the life of another person you qualify for the ultimate in governmental moneymakers I'll explain very soon.

If you're in our prison for immigrating illegally we kick you out with the warning that if you return illegally you will get to play a part in my plan that is yet to come.

If you are a legitimate threat to national security you get to play a part in the plan yet to come.

White collar crimes cost the government and the public billions of dollars each year, you should get no less of a sentence than somebody who walked into a bank and held it up for the same amount of money at gunpoint. It may not be physical harm being caused but the financial harm may be nearly as bad. This especially includes internet crimes such as hacking and fraud. Find something better to do with your fucking time. If you are caught creating hacking programs or viruses you will get an part in the plan yet to come.

If you rape somebody or molest, you also qualify for the my new government program. Before you do though, you will be castrated and then allowed to heal first.

If you repeatedly cause harm to the public or commit armed crimes 3 strikes and you're out, or you're in my new program better yet.

All of these things go for "mentally ill" offenders as well. You can't fix stupid and you can't fix retarded so you might as well deal with it in a manner that will keep it focused and not causing more harm.

Gang related crimes automatically gain you two strikes the first time. The message, joining a gang is not a good idea.

What is this great plan you may be wondering. Here it is. My solution has two parts. The first one should appease the retards at PETA. We have a lot of medications, cosmetics, and general medical things to study for the good of society. You decided to harm society and now you will have the chance to help it. If medical research companies want to buy you, you belong to the state now and you will be sold to them for research purposes until they are finished with you or you die. If they finish with you and nobody else wants you, you then qualify for part two of my plan along with all those who were not purchased by these companies.

Part two of my plan is a grand one I assure you. Remember the good old days of the Roman empire when the masses could head on down the the Colosseum for a gladiator fight, a reenacted sea battle or some other famous land battle. Of course you don't, it was too long ago, but you will, part 2 of my plan will bring it back.



Chariot races abound, it will be a grand event.



I personally will have season tickets. We have plenty of stadiums around the country to house it, we charge heartily for it, and all the money can go back into government systems. This way we discourage some crimes, we rid the world of criminals who can't be deterred, and the public is entertained in the process at a profit. Not politically correct? Against human rights? Maybe, but I don't like political correctness anyhow, if you don't care so little about the rights of others that you violate them willingly and in the right manner then you have given up yours.

Humans love to waste money and to feel like they're helping those who are less fortunate or other stupid designations of the sort. I don't, I like a society that functions properly and protects the rights and the lives of those who are deserving. I like feeling safe when I walk in the street after dark no matter where it is I may choose to walk. Society is simply better off without some people. There really are people that cannot be saved and there isn't a single reason why we should keep them around clogging up prisons and burning up taxpayer money. I like solving problems and this is the only type of prison reform that will ever actually work.

Immigration, The Less Fortunate, Welfare States & Cancer

I'm going to use this as a lesson plan. I was over browsing at the All Seeing Eye and I came across this story. It took me all of about 1/2 a second to make the connection.

The Copenhagen Times ran an a poll and found that the number of people begging on the streets of Denmark has risen.

The poll shows that 70 percent of respondents have been asked for spare change in the last year.

The poll also showed that 58 percent of people believe that the number of beggars has risen in the last five years – a view that is shared by Deputy Chief Superintendent Mogens Lauridsen of the Copenhagen Police.

‘After the expansion of the EU in 2007, we saw a noticeable influx of beggars from Eastern European countries,’ Lauridsen said to Politiken newspaper.
A police spokesman said street begging in Copenhagen had developed a seasonal trend and in summer, it was usually Romanian woman with children doing it.

Even though people believe there are more beggars, they are less inclined to hand over money according to the poll, in which 12 percent said they would give money to a beggar.

Reasons for avoiding handing over spare change included not wanting to feel pressured into doing so and not wanting to contribute to alcoholism. Some believed it was the state’s responsibility to look after the disadvantaged.

I especially like the part about it being "the state's responsibility." I won't claim to know much about how their state is run but if it's anything like ours, the person who said that is such a fucking retard I'm surprised he/she remembers to breathe. If the state pays for it, you pay for it dumbass. Where the hell do you think the state gets it's money.

I ask that you please excuse me if you are not one of the retards. If you get the concept of what I am about to say already then this is not intended for you. I am going to break this down for you in the most efficient manner that I can.

Every country has it's own system and within that system there are going to be varying classes of people. Even in a communist society this will inevitably occur, it is human nature. When you have loose borders people will travel freely between the above stated countries. When some of those people from the "less fortunate" classes within one country eventually realize that things are simply not working out within their own country they will seek opportunities elsewhere. Occasionally these people are "less fortunate" due to no fault of their own and the grass will actually turn out to be greener for them in another pasture.

Usually the "less fortunate" are so because of their own failures. Usually it is not solely the country but the ethics and or attitudes of the individuals. These attitudes and ethics which are ingrained in the people will then be carried over to the new host country. It's very hard to teach an old dog new tricks. What inevitably happens is that these people travel to a new country and carry on the same bad habits that got them into that situation in the first place, into the new country and their situation stays the same. The only thing that will change is the strain on the new host country to care for those who couldn't manage to care for themselves no matter what country they are in.

Open borders is a nice thought but all that it will lead to in the end is the disease spreading like a cancer across the borders and systematically destroying countries like it destroys bodily systems until there is a total breakdown. The only way to control the spread is to control the borders and watch who is crossing them. We're seeing it occurring in Europe, we're seeing it in the UK, we're seeing it in the U.S., and there is nobody to blame but spreading socialism and political correctness.

You simply cannot help everybody no matter how much you may want to. I liken this a helicopter in flight. If you could place people onto said helicopter in mid flight you could only do so for a certain period of time. Assuming that the vehicle had infinite room in it, which it does not, you would eventually reach the weight limit. Not everybody in the vehicle is serving a purpose, many are simply dead weight. Eventually the crew of the helicopter (who are causing it to stay in flight), in this case the taxpayers, are going to have to realize that altitude is quickly being lost and the ground is rising. They're going to have to say "that's it, no more passengers. If the crew does not stand up for themselves and say "you know what, if your own helicopter will not fly, you need to fix it so it does because you cannot all pile on ours." If they don't, they will find themselves crashing and grounded, or worse, just like the one from which the immigrants emigrated.

The situation in the United States is a perfect example and the idiot Obama is making his best attempt to make it worse. Our own citizens, the ones who would prefer to collect welfare than to work. Criminals, praying off of the public and then being supported by the prison systems for years, even decades. Severely mentally incompetent with nobody to support them are living in asylums on the taxpayer dime. Mexicans crossing into our borders in droves are dragging us all down. Our helicopter is fully loaded and it cannot take any more passengers. When are we going to realize this?

As for Mexicans, yes, some are here and working productively and that's fine, as long as they go through the correct channels and get here legally. I've worked with plenty of Mexicans in my time and the majority of them were great people, hard workers, and far better for the country than many who were born here. Mexicans themselves are not the issue. Legality is the issue. The greater majority are not here legally and for that reason they don't have legal jobs, they don't make enough to support their often large families, they have no healthcare, and the taxpayers are footing the bill. Obama wants to present them with amnesty and yet there are not enough jobs available for roughly 10% of those who are legal residents of the country. This presents what should be an obvious problem.

I won't even get into the problem with Islam but this one follows this same framework. They come to our countries and they want to keep their same ways about things and ideals that have kept their own home countries in the dark ages. This should be absolutely unacceptable and yet many welcome it with open arms. Our country in particular got to where it is because immigrants originally came from other countries wanting to leave their old one behind and start something new, not Islam, they want to drag us down with them.

What I want to know is when will the United States learn, when will the UK learn, when will the world learn that these are problems that cannot be remedied, they must be contained in the countries that allow them to start in the first place until they work themselves out. In many cases problem is not Mexicans in general or Eastern Europeans in general, (with Islam the problem is Islam so therefore it is Muslims but that's a different story), the problem isn't usually the countries in general but the types of people who are leaving those countries and coming to ours. They're looking for handouts to begin with and they show up because they know they'll get them in the countries they're going to. Mankind got to the position we used to be in by letting natural selection sort things out. Mankind got into the problems we have today by obtaining the arrogant attitude that we are so great and so powerful that we can circumvent all of the rules that allow nature and allow societies to function in a healthy manner and eventually it's going to have to stop. If we don't stop it in time I assure you, this is a cancer from which there will be no recovery.

Modern America & History of Political Correctness

There is little I can say leading into this video. There is no introduction that will do it justice. Though a little long, I urge you not to let that deter you in watching this one through, break it up into sections if you must but it will be worth it. Absolutely brilliant, absolutely true, absolute must see. Thanks to Infidel Bloggers Aliance, Vlad Tepes Blog, and PJTV.

Link:

Christopher Hitchens Smokes The Chomskyite

Snagged this one over at Infidel Bloggers Alliance. Very enjoyable.

I Just Wanted To Say

Edward "Ted" "Teddy" Kennedy passed away today after a long bout with brain cancer or something of the sort. I was hoping he would die during the election when he almost crapped out the first time. I must say, bye bye you fat bastard, you will not be missed. If I believed in hell I would say, I hope you're enjoying the pig roast. One less liberal crusader douchebag fucking up our country.

Next up, Nanci Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, and Henry Waxman! C'mmmmmmmon Anal Cancer!

Is it slightly wrong for me to say such things? Wrong to tear apart the deceased, even if he/she was an asshole? Eh, quite possibly but the fact of the matter is this: Everybody else jumps on the wagon to talk the person up as though they were a saint. Look at Michael Jackson for example. An *alleged* child molester turned into a media darling and a hero. Bullshit. Ted Kennedy wasn't a good person, he was a fat, vile, self serving, douchebag who has pushed socialist horseshit policies for decades. Am I an asshole for pointing it out? You may think so, I look at it as simply being blunt and willing to speak my mind.

Please Take Note

On my blog entitled "The Real Islam" you will notice a photo missing, removed by photobucket for "terms of use violation." Apparently a cartoon of Obama Apologizing to Hitler for D-Day is unacceptable to photobucket. Interesting.

America... Perpetually Lowering The Bar... Fuck Yeah!

Many guys dream of landing that perfect supermodel girlfriend one day. That woman you can show off to your friends. The woman who has a body of a goddess that causes you to take pause in awe when you catch a glimpse of it. Many guys simply don't have the looks or maybe the money to get that girl but there might just be hope for you yet. This is the age of the ginormous models! *ECHO FOR EFFECT*

Lizzie Miller, age 20 is a "model" and I use the term loosely because obviously they do. She recently "rocked the magazine industry" when her photo appeared alongside an article on women’s body confidence in the September issue of Glamour magazine. The photo shows Miller flashing a candid smile and a floppy belly that hangs over her thong bikini.

Within a day, Glamour was inundated with comments, overwhelmingly positive, about the magazine’s showcasing a beautiful model unafraid to let it all hang out. (and hang it did)

Glamour editor Cindi Leive says Miller is proving to be a game changer when it comes to fashion magazines — which often pay lip service to the idea of representing all women, but usually opt for the carrot-sticks-and-cigarettes, skin-and-bones types when it comes to cover girls.

“I think it absolutely will,” Leive told Matt Lauer on TODAY Monday. “You get a reaction like this and you can really see it. It’s also a sign of the times that women are really looking for a little bit more authenticity and a little bit less artifice in every part of their lives.

Ironically, the fashion mountain came out of what amounted to a molehill of a picture. Miller’s life-altering pose was not on the cover of Glamour; it was just a 3-inch-by-3-inch photo illustration buried on page 194.

“Immediately, within hours of the magazine coming out, we had people telling us they were e-mailing it to friends, and that it was the first time they felt good about their own bodies, looking at this picture,” Leive told Lauer.

One reader wrote to Glamour saying, “Get this hot momma off of page 194 and put her on the cover!”

Really? Do we honestly want to see a flappy belly hanging out on the magazine rack? Bet you a hundred bucks it wasn't a man who said that. If it was, it was not a white man. (don't blame me, stereotypes are there for a reason) No, we don't want to see that, the only people who do want to see that are those with flappy bellies who want to justify their own situation.

Another reader said, “Thank you for showing a picture of a BEAUTIFUL woman who has a stomach and thighs that look like mine! I have NEVER seen that in a magazine before.”

Because thunder thighs are certainly something to aspire to. Bust out the chicken wings and sit the fuck down before you burn a calorie.

Yet another said, “This woman rocks and we need more women like her to make a mark on what the real woman looks like.”

A "real woman"? Oh yeah? I don't fucking think so lady. To show what "the average woman" looks like... yeah, that could work. I'm going to be a real bastard for a minute and I'm going to say that if you put my idea of a "real woman" side by side with this lady's idea of a "real woman" and asked a thousand men to choose by body type alone, mine is getting chosen at minimum 3/4 of the time.

Now, I have a few things to say about this so hear me out before you start bitching. If you then would like to commence bitching, by all means, I would honestly love to hear your arguments. This woman is big, not obese big, but diesel big. In that one photo above she looks like she's debating how many times she could bench press Cindi Leive. This is like Helga the East German powerlifter. At 180 pounds, this woman is only 20 pounds lighter than me and I'm a bodybuilder (maybe not a good one, but I put in my time).

The simple fact of the matter is that I believe men like what men like. Obviously, every man is different but some things are the norm, and some simply are not. Again, obviously, women and men alike would love to be found attractive by everybody exactly as we are, but that just isn't how it works and you simply can't force it. Nobody ever told me what was supposed to be attractive, some women just are and some women just aren't. Just like some men like men and some women like women. That's not learned, it just happens. You can argue it all day but I honestly think ads and television and such have very little to do with that, especially since I have eccentric tastes. Essentially what I'm saying is that in my opinion, it's more nature, than nurture.

What many men like is something that may not be "runway model thin" but leans more toward that direction. Thin implies a lot of things in our culture, including the likelihood of being fit. Thin also means a hard body that is aesthetically far more pleasing to the eye of most than flaps and rolls. (I SAID MOST, NOT ALL)

Enough of my nature vs nurture argument. What my real point is is this. If you show a number of people photographs of thin (not anorexic), muscular, flabby (average), and fat (obese) people and ask them to select their body by choosing a picture, you would almost never get anything but thin and or muscular except in those who have already been brainwashed. You must then consider that many will say they're happy with their body and feel beautiful, etc., but would they honestly stick with that statement if they had to do no work to change their body other than simply admitting and pointing to a photo of the desired result? I think not. Granted some people are just naturally big, and some people find that attractive, which is perfectly fine. The majority of people are not naturally big and this attempting to shift the paradigm is simply horseshit.

This is yet another example of Americans lowering the bar. If you can't jump over it at the prescribed height, do everything you can to bring it down a few notches until you can ooze over it like the slug you are. Going to the gym is hard. Eating right isn't very fun. Being a turd who watches tv all night and eats ice cream is pleasing. So, if meeting a higher goal is too difficult or not totally enjoyable, attempt to convince others that the goal isn't a good one anymore. This is the adult equivalent of not keeping score at a little league game and letting everybody play regardless of lack of talent.

Whatever happened to working hard toward a goal? What happened to aspiring to be something better than what we are? Nowadays, it just takes too much work to go out and take a run or go for a bike ride after work. Nowadays, it seems to be the goal to just bitch and whine that it's not reasonable and maybe not that much healthier anyhow so we need to stop being misogynistic pigs who expect women (and men in some cases) to live up to this impossible standard. What we are doing is trying to change the requirements to get into the special forces so we can take the glory away from them simply because we personally were not good enough to get in. I call bullshit on you America, get off your lazy ass and run off the ponch or shut the fuck up and let us be attracted to what we're attracted to.


Shake that ass show us what yer worth, shake that ass, knock us off the earth!

For those of you who actually enjoy staying fit, hope you like fatties because the percentage is getting higher and higher. On the bright side, you can hide a spare house or care key under his/her spare tire! It's great storage space!

Glenn Beck... Standing Up For Truth & Free Speech

This is good, this is really good, in a really bad way. It turns out that 33 advertisers have dropped Glenn Beck's show. Why would they do this? He called President Obama a racist.





I'm quite sure it's clear why our brilliant host/narrator here isn't out finding a cure for cancer. Brilliant commentary good sir! I do not know who you are, but your intelligence is obviously unmatched in this or any other world. Your reasoning is borderline genius, and your delivery nearly Shakespearean. I stand in awe of you Mr. Narrator Guy.

So the president is exempt from criticism now is he? He's flawless, not a single possibility that he may actually be slightly racist? Not even when he automatically assumed that the black man was right and that police "acted stupidly" in the beginning of the Louis Gates scandal? Hmm, go figure.

A total of 33 Fox advertisers, including Wal-Mart Stores Inc., CVS Caremark, Clorox and Sprint, directed that their commercials not air on Beck's show, according to the companies and ColorofChange.org, a group that promotes political action among blacks and launched a campaign to get advertisers to abandon him. That's more than a dozen more than were identified a week ago.

ColorofChange.org, who's website was "503 Service Unavailable" when I tried to look it up for further information on the subject. Now this is an organization that makes a point of "promoting political voice in the black community." You've heard the argument a million times before and if you don't see how it's correct you are retarded. If I start an organization specifically and expressly stated as to promote solely the voice, or anything else of whites only, the racism gestapo in the form of groups just like Color of Change, or the NAACP would be all over me and yet when blacks do it it's fine? Great, welcome to America, where only whites can be racist and if you attempt to make a point otherwise, it must be because you are racist. You people who buy into this should logically be drooling and shitting in your pants like you have a quota to fill.

While it's unclear what effect, if any, this will ultimately have on Fox and Beck, it is already making advertisers skittish about hawking their wares within the most opinionated cable TV shows.

I find this funny since anybody with any brain at all knows that commercials are just company methods of being money grubbing attention whores who interrupt my show to try to peddle their crap. Most people are fully aware that 90% of the time, the opinion of the advertiser and the opinion of the show being interrupted have nothing in common at all other than a business relationship. One company needs to push their crap on the viewer and the other needs money to push their view, nothing more. Then again, some would say that Fox is right leaning and therefore evil and terrible. On the other hand, those who say that are all the other organizations that lean left.

The Clorox Co., a former Beck advertiser, now says that "we do not want to be associated with inflammatory speech used by either liberal or conservative talk show hosts." The maker of bleach and household cleaners said in a statement that it has decided not to advertise on political talk shows.

Have at it Clorox. A commercial might sway me to buy a car, or a pizza, but when I need bleach, whatever happens to be somewhere around eye level and is nicely priced is what is going in my cart. All the commercials in the world aren't going to change that.

The shows present a dilemma for advertisers, who usually like a "safe" environment for their messages. The Olbermanns, Hannitys, O'Reillys, Maddows and Becks of the TV world are more likely to say something that will anger a viewer, who might take it out on sponsors.

"This is a good illustration of that conundrum," said Rich Hallabran, spokesman for UPS Stores, which he said has temporarily halted buying ads on Fox News Channel as a whole.

This from a company that I know for an absolute fact (at least in one particular branch depot) will pull a steel rod out which has pierced all the way through a computer monitor box, patch up the box, and ship on the broken monitor and had a joke among some employees that fragile means it bounces higher. I know that's not representative of the company but it is tolerated. This is a union driven company. So in other words, left leaning.

Beck can bring the eyeballs. With the health care debate raising political temperatures, his show had its biggest week ever right before his vacation, averaging 2.4 million viewers each day, according to Nielsen Media Research.

He was actually on another Fox show July 28 when he referred to Obama as a racist with "a deep-seated hatred for white people." The network immediately distanced itself from Beck's statement, but Beck didn't. He used his radio show the next day to explain why he believed that. He would not comment for this article, spokesman Matthew Hiltzik said.

So Glenn Beck not only made a statement, but he actually stands by it enough to stand up for it? He's actually willing to risk his career (and a lot of money) to stick to his guns? That's un-American, at least in modern America.

ColorofChange.org quickly targeted companies whose ads had appeared during Beck's show, telling them what he had said and seeking a commitment to drop him. The goal is to make Beck a liability, said James Rucker, the organization's executive director.

At least these jackals know that they have no opposition in their crooked game of pin the scandal on whitey.

"They have a toxic asset," Rucker said. "They can either clean it up or get rid of it."

Silencing the dissent. It works for Islam, why shouldn't it work for racist black groups. Yeah, I said black, because most of these people never lived in Africa. If you were not born in Africa you are not African American. I don't get to call myself Scotch-Irish-American simply because my ancestors came from there so you don't get to call yourself African-American and if you disagree you can go fuck yourself. If I'm white then you're black, I'll even give you brown if you prefer in certain cases but that's the best you get.

One company, CVS Caremark, said it advertises on Fox but hadn't said anything about Beck. Now it has told its advertising agency to inform Fox that it wanted no commercials on Beck. "We support vigorous debate, especially around policy issues that affect millions of Americans, but we expect it to be informed, inclusive and respectful," said spokeswoman Carolyn Castel.

That's an impressively uninformed, noninclusive, and generally moronic statement in that context. So basically a debate can be allowed as long as something that some might find offensive isn't said, even if that something offensive to those some, might be true? Good job Carolyn, at least we know you aren't even smart enough to make a valid point. I understand though, your company disagrees with Beck but can't outright say that so around the bush you go to earn your paycheck. Valid attempt.

Besides the unpredictability of the opinionated cable hosts, the rapid pace of today's wired world complicates decisions on where to place ads, said Kathleen Dunleavy, a spokeswoman for Sprint. She said she was surprised at how fast the Beck issue spread across social media outlets and how quickly advertiser names were attached to it.

UPS' Hallabran said the decision to pull commercials "should not be interpreted as we are permanently withdrawing our advertising from Fox." He said the company wants to reach viewers with a wide spectrum of opinions.

I understand Hallabran, the company wants to make as much money as possible off as much of the population as it can but doesn't care if the president is or is not racist as long as they're making money. Disagreement breeds boycott, indifference has no effect at all.

Beck supporters have suggested that retaliation might have something to do with ColorofChange.org's campaign. One of the group's founders, Van Jones, now works in the Obama administration and has been criticized by Beck. But Rucker said Jones has nothing to do with ColorofChange.org now and didn't even know about the campaign before it started.

Of course he didn't, they never knew about it, especially not the type of people who associate with such highly specialized and highly specific groups, especially a co-founder, these types don't keep close ties. It's like when somebody leaves their first job in high school, no looking back.

But it could mean advertising time becomes cheaper on his show than such a large audience would normally command. Some of his show's advertisers last week included a male enhancement pill, a law firm looking to sue on behalf of asbestos victims, a company selling medical supplies to diabetics and a water filter company.

Basically the same garbage that advertises on pretty much every opportunity they get.

Rucker said ColorofChange.org has contacted about 60 companies regarding Beck, and is heartened by the response. "It's causing a certain conversation around Beck, which I think is important," he said.

Because you Mr. Rucker, are a racist asshat who is trying to push your fucked up agenda, of course you are heartened by the fact that you can be openly racist and Joe Public is so anti-racist he won't call you racist for fear of being called racist himself. May you get run over by a Amtrak train. As for Obama, Beck is right, Obama is racist, I personally stand by Beck and his statements and he has my utmost respect for his honesty and willingness to stand up for truth.

I don't know if I would honestly say that Obama hates whitey with the contempt which I feel for him as a shitty president. What I will say and say confidently is that his agenda is to do as beck said. He wants to push black people ahead at any cost to whitey that may be required and he can get away with. I truly believe that Obama believes that the situation of blacks in America as a community largely infested with crime and poverty is solely caused by white people when the only situation we caused them is that they are here instead of in Africa running from children with AK-47s. It is a fact that those who scream racism the loudest and most often are those who are truly the most racist. It is also a fact that not everybody who points out racism is doing so out of racism. This Mr. Video Narrator Rocket Scientist, is also a fact. Obama is out to make clandestine reparations, it's that simple. I have no problem whatsoever with any racial group as a group. What I have a problem with is individuals who prefer to lay down and blame society for their issues rather than stand up and overcome them. Nobody is to blame for your own problems except yourself and maybe in some cases your parents but there are none that cannot be avoided or overcome.

Few people would have the balls to stand up and risk what Mr. Beck risked by saying what he said in the name of truth and free speech. I commend you Glenn Beck.

Lockerbie Bomber... I Can't Let It Be.

I really was not going to comment on this, I honestly and truly wasn't. That was of course, before I was basically berated as the typical stupid American. I'm not sure it actually would have mattered what my opinion had been when I made the comment on the unnamed blog, a representative of the great American bully was needed for roasting and I was he. I won't name the blog because, understandably, tempers are high over such a testy subject but I simply must add my piece, just a piece.

Everybody has heard about the release of Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi (the Lockerie bomber). If you haven't you live under a rock. Anyhow, he's dying of prostate cancer. Senteneced for killing 270 people, 189 of them American, he was released, after only 8 years for humanitarian (compassion)reasons because he has prostate cancer and only 3 months to live.

Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill, who made the decision to release Megrahi, said at a news conference in Edinburgh that humanity was a defining characteristic of the Scottish people and that "our belief dictates that justice be served but mercy be shown."

In defending his decision, MacAskill said that after seeking medical advice, he determined that Megrahi had about three months left to live, considered appropriate for release on compassionate grounds in Scotland. Since 2000, the Scottish government has received 30 applications for release on compassionate grounds; 24 have been approved.

MacAskill said that Megrahi "did not show his victims any comfort or compassion. They were not allowed to return to the bosom of their families to see out their lives, let alone their dying days. No compassion was shown by him to them. But that alone is not a reason for us to deny compassion to him and his family in his final days."

Really? That alone isn't enough? Really? Just what exactly might constitute "enough" you delusional asshat? 270 people with families who loved them had their lives taken with calculated malice by the hand of this man. What more do you need? This is a perfect example of moronic leftist horseshit. "We must punish them with love and compassion and eventually they'll see the light because all people are inherently good." If he murders your family member and you want to drop charges then have at it but it's easy to show blind and pointless compassion when it really doesn't affect you. There was actually a comment on on the post that I mentioned above about what I interpreted to be the U.S. and their "barbaric use of the death penalty." Again, I'm not even saying the view was the blog owner, I'm saying that it was the foaming at the mouth, leftist retard who made that particular comment but this crap is rampant.

If you ever wonder why terror doesn't stop now you know. Because if you don't actually punish it what is the deterrent. These assholes should live in a 2 foot by 2 foot cell, 24 hours a day without ever leaving. They should be forced to eat nothing but pork in prison. If they won't eat it, it should be liquefied and applied via IV. They should be given nothing to drink but beer and that should be forced into them as well if they refuse. They should be forced to view anime porn depictions of Allah and Muhammad daily. They should be bathed in dog piss at least 3 times a day and should have to sleep in a dog bed. The bible should be read to them daily and they should get no Qur'an. All of the guards who implement these rules should be giant, steroid swilling, feminist, man hating, lesbian, female powerlifters with a chip on their shoulder. The only other option should be that we light you on fire and hurl you out of an airplane of the mud-hut dwelling cesspool of a dark ages settlement from which you came. Compassion is for the compassionate. Retribution should be dispensed toward the wicked.

The Real Islam

Islam shows it's true colors yet again. It's proof that we are "infidel" and will continue to be so whether in their country or amongst them in our own. I'd like to thank the Goomba News Network for finding this gem for me.





Wake up America, they will never bend to our rules, they will continue to abuse and play the victim until we've crumbled under theirs. Stand up now or you will kneel at the feet of Islam. I am absolutely ashamed that the country our forefathers fought to forge is being placed as a sacrament at the feet of these animals.

Are The President's Lips Detachable From The Collective Islamic Ass?

What the hell is he smoking and where do I get some?



I haven't seen such a delusional asshole since Ralph the Acid Dropper in college. He is hundreds of miles past the exit for reality and still truckin'. The primary thing I want to say is to Mr. Obama himself. I would like to say, "speak for yourself you stupid bastard." Honestly, really, I wish unspeakable horrors on Islam during the month of Ramadan. I hope somebody oh, say, crashes a plane into their Hajj. I would laugh and cheer and dance in the street. Then again I'm a vindictive asshole completely lacking political correctness who believes that you'll reap what you sew. The simple fact of the matter is that it pisses me off even more than our president has hit his knees with such quickness at the drop of the Muslim pants. Is there anybody you do not feel the that we as Americans DO NOT need to apologize to?



It's a constant barrage of apologetic bullshit to fucktards who should be nuked. I have nothing but complete contempt for this president and I hope he gets impeached before offers to give our houses to Muslim families as reparations. I would also like to once again, say thank you sooo much to all of you out there who voted for President Benedict Arnold Obama. Thanks Assholes!

"Racist Attack" on Muslim Mosque

I'm REEEEALLY starting to like the French.

Muslims in a town in eastern France were shocked by a racist attack on their mosque which was sprayed with racist graffiti and defaced with pieces of pork.

The attack on the mosque in Toul is believed to have taken place in the early hours of Wednesday. It was daubed with inscriptions saying "France for the French", "Here it's Nazi" and "Don't touch my pig," along with Nazi swastikas.

"This is an act of cowardice," said Nurdin Hamza, head of the local Maghrebi association.

Is it really? I guess who but a Muslim to know about acts of cowardice, they do practically get included in the definition.

"Whether it is a mosque or a church, a synagogue, a Buddhist temple, or any other public place, we will always condemn this sort of act."

Yet it's funny, if you google "Muslims Attack Church(es)" or "Muslims Attack Christians" you'll find all sorts of articles about that and you don't seem to hear all that many Muslims speaking up.

Two youths in their 20s were arrested hours after the vandalism, French television said, giving no other information. According to the police, the youths were caught spraying swastikas onto the wall of a kebab restaurant in a nearby town.

Sarkozy contacted the head of the French Muslim Council, Mohammed Moussaoui, to express his "indignation" and promised to "ensure those responsible are punished", the president's office said.

It's quite interesting how Western cultures are expected to reign in and punish our "radicals" who attack Muslims and yet Muslims do nothing more than spout hollow words that are barely disagreeable when the attacks are the other way around. I think it's reasonable to say that when Muslims start standing up and controlling their own radicals and working with us to do so, then we'll talk. Until this happens, I say Islam is finally beginning to reap what it has sewn and they can fuck off and deal with it or get the hell out. These assholes should be happy the petty vandals don't take their "attacks" to the same level Muslim radicals do and walk into the middle of a prayer and blow them all up. I would personally buy these blokes a beer.

At least it would appear that some French remember their history and look toward the future. Considering that this is one of the first countries occupied by one of the most horrific regimes the world has known (besides of course, oh, say, the caliphate) it's not surprising that they're beginning to recognize that history repeats itself if allowed. I hope the French people continue to stand up and fight and I sincerely hope the rest of Europe does as well.

Banning The "Burquini"

It would appear that some European countries are learning.

Muslim women have been banned from wearing the burqini one Italian town of Varallo Sesia.

Women wearing the garment, made up of a veil, a tunic and loose leggings, face a fine of €500 (£430) if they are spotted at swimming pools or rivers, the ANSA news agency reported.

The anti-immigration mayor of the northern Piedmont town said: "The sight of a 'masked woman' could disturb small children, not to mention problems of hygiene.

"We don't have to be tolerant all the time," Gianluca Buonanno said.

Justifying the move, Mr Buonanno added: "Imagine a western woman bathing in a bikini in a Muslim country. The consequences could be decapitation, prison or deportation. We are merely prohibiting the use of the burqini."

Additionally

Last week a swimming pool in Paris refused entry to a burqini-clad woman on similar grounds, adding to tensions over Muslim dress in France.

The incident came as French lawmakers conducted hearings on whether to ban the burqa after President Nicolas Sarkozy said the head-to-toe body covering and veil was "not welcome" in France, which is home to Europe's biggest Muslim minority.

Mr Buonanno belongs to the Northern League, a party allied with the centre-Righ

The People of Freedom party led by Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister.

The woman, named only as Carole, 35, was told that the garment, a swimsuit that covers most of the body, was "inappropriate" clothing for a public baths.

Pool staff said her three-piece Islamic swimsuit she bought in Dubai - consisting of a headscarf, tunic and trousers - was against pool regulations and unhygienic.

They had "reminded her of the rules that apply in all [public] swimming pools which forbid swimming while clothed," said Daniel Guillaume, a manager at the pool in the suburb of Emerainville.

The ban was imposed as President Nicolas Sarkozy's government is considering an outright ban on all Islamic dress, such as the head-to-toe burka or niqab, that it considers a "sign of subservience" and "not welcome" in France.

"We cannot accept to have in our country women who are prisoners behind netting, cut off from all social life, deprived of identity," he added.

Some swimming pools had already caved into women-only sessions, he said, but this was apparently "not sufficient for fundamentalists".

"What they want is a world of burkas," one official warned.

France is home to Europe's largest five million Muslim population. In 2004, it passed a law banning students from wearing veils and other religious symbols in schools.

I really can't add anything except to say good for them. Finally, countries willing to stand up for themselves and their own culture. Nobody with any ability to think freely and any knowledge of Islam at all knows that they would do the same to us. The above statement about wearing a bikini in a Muslim country is absolutely true. In their country we would be forced to adopt and abide by their culture and the same requirements should be extended to them. They've proven they want just the opposite of blending in. This is nothing more than attempting to make a political and religious statement and these people are simply attempting to play the victim as they always do.

Go Ahead, Call Me Irrational, But

I just saw a commercial that made me wonder. Many have been condemned for making similar statements before me but then again when has that stopped me before? The commercial was for www.joinred.com and I missed part of it so I had to go see what it was. The whole point is trying to get donations and selling crap to make money to send medication to Africa to treat AIDS patients.

Now correct me if I'm wrong and I know some of you Liberal types will have a brilliant and well thought out argument. If we give them medication to treat AIDS that keeps them alive longer, are they not just going to continue to spread the disease like a California forest fire? These people think some children are shape shifting witches who turn into goats and steal penises. We can't get them to use condoms and you sure as shit aren't going to get them to stop having sex. We can't manage to keep them from starving to death because the land already can't sustain the current population. The majority of the continent doesn't even have functioning governments. Children run around with AK-47s in 1/3 of the countries there like children here ride bicycles, and you're going to successfully fight AIDS? Yeah, good luck with that hippies.

I personally will only donate money if it is guaranteed to go towards the quarantine of the entire continent to prevent anybody from either coming or going until that shithole sorts itself out. Talk about throwing money down the toilet. Don't you do-gooder cocksuckers see that your own country has plenty of it's own problems to get sorted out first, including it's own AIDS epidemic. This is like an alcoholic, wife-beating man teaching a family counseling seminar!

Here's One For The Parents

I need a break from politics for a minute to catch my breath again so I decided to write on something less stressful. Do you do nothing else all day long except think of ways your child might get hurt. Do you want to pad your child from any and all contact with the world and the potentially injurious things contained within it? Here are some bike safety tips that will help.

Bike helmets are as important to your child's safety as the bike's brakes or well-inflated tires. You will want to make sure your child does a walk around inspection of his or her bike prior to each and every ride. The inspection should take at least 10 minutes and if any malfunctions or potential problems are found the child should be presented with tags for tagging the bike out for maintenance. Once this is done and the bike is deemed safe, the child must be required to don his/her properly constructed cranial safety protective device.

The American Academy of Pediatrics offers this advice about beginning the helmet habit at the earliest age possible: This means as soon as the child exits the vagina a helmet should be placed on him/her because the danger begins immediately! (Warning: It is possible that the following American Academy of Pediatrics information was slightly edited by yours truly, but only in the name of making your child safer)

Make helmets a rule as soon as your child is on a bike, either as a passenger or the driver. If the child does not at first want to obey the rule and refuses to do as told then you should try one of several things. Ask the child again, and again, repeatedly and firmly but do not raise your voice. Threaten a 30 second "time out" to think about his/her noncompliance. Child does not get to watch favorite television show today (you'll want to be sure to tivo it and allow it tomorrow instead, otherwise it would be considered cruel). If none of these steps work repeat repeatedly until one of them does.

Make sure you set a good example and wear a helmet, too. If you look like a douche, along with your child, the child is less likely to become aware of the douchiness... at least for a while.

Explain to your child why it's important to wear a helmet, including the protection it provides. Impressing the importance of this upon the child may be difficult but it is imperative that you convince the child that a horrifying death is certain if he/she fails to wear the helmet. *tip: showing car crash photos containing gore and split skulls with leaking brain matter may be of assistance*

Talk about how a bike must be used safely and properly. A bike is certainly not intended for fun. The child must know that horseplay will not be tolerated and can be very dangerous. Never allow the child to take part in the following activities:

jumping the bike off ramps, riding off road, riding outside the yard, wheelies, one handed riding, no handed riding, racing, riding at a rapid pace, anything else that makes the child feel alive or smile.

Offer praise or a little treat when your child wears a helmet. Eventually you will brainwash the child into properly realizing that taking risk is very bad and that safety and reward will be given for being an obedient follower of asinine rules.

Don't ever allow your child to go for a ride without a helmet. If the child is allowed to ride for even 1 second without a helmet, death will occur with unprecedented stealth and violence.

Encourage your child's playmates also to wear helmets. It is a near certainty that you are the only parent in the neighborhood who actually knows what is best for kids. You are all knowing and enlightened and the other parents are simply unfit and ignorant of your progressive and child safe ways. For these reasons it is up to you to not only impose your rules upon your own children, but to step in and compensate for the poor parenting around you. Remember, with your superior knowledge and parenting ability, you can make the culdesac a better AND SAFER place for all!

Next I will answer a question that was submitted to DEAR ABBY and a response to that letter from another reader.

DEAR ABBY: "Lisa in Phoenix" (June 12) questioned whether taking her 7-year-old son into the ladies' room would be better than having her wait outside the men's room. You advised her to stand outside the men's room and announce loudly that she will be "waiting right there." Abby, children have been violated in a matter of seconds in the play areas of fast food restaurants with the parents RIGHT THERE!

This is absolutely right "Vigilant Mom." Did you know that there are molesters hiding behind the doors of 9/10 public restrooms nowadays! That's a fact! Bet you didn't also know that it only takes .173 seconds for the average molester to spot a child, get wood, lick his molestache, pull down his pants, and plug your child's bum, did you? He'll be done and gone by the time the stopwatch hits the 2 second mark!

As a mother, I feel the advice you gave Lisa will give her a false sense of security and put her child in danger. I would have told Lisa that before they go anywhere, she should make sure her son goes to the bathroom at home. If he has to go while they are out, she should go to the men's room, knock on the door and announce that she is with a child. If there is no answer, GO IN AND BE SURE NO ONE IS INSIDE. If she's uncomfortable doing it, ask an employee to check. Then wait outside the bathroom. If a man needs to go in, she can explain the situation. Never assume that simply standing guard outside the door will deter a molester. They couldn't care less. -- VIGILANT MOM IN SOUTH CAROLINA

The only thing "Vigilant Mom" forgot to add was that she should also be sure to stand behind Little Billy to protect his bum from a molester rush attack. She will also want to hold his little wee-wee for him because if it is left unattended it may be subject to a ninja-molester-groping. There are so many countless dangers that she will likely want to continue this until Billy begins dating. This will ensure that the child will grow up un-molested and perfectly adjusted to life in the real world.

I would like to suggest some additional alternatives. How about this "Vigilant Mom." How about you stay the fuck out of the mens room because I will walk in and piss whether you're in there and would like me to wait or not. You're child is going to grow up to be a giant vagina anyhow so maybe you should just take his pansy-ass into the womens room where he's going to go anyhow after he turns 18, changes his name to "Pandora" and starts wearing women's underwear and stilletos.

What the fuck is wrong with people? Yeah there are some freaks and nutters out there but there always have been. In modern times the freaks and nutters just make the news and get more played up than they used to. Let your fucking child take a leak on his own, he'll be fine. If you're in a public park in Washington D.C. then the worst that will happen is a Republican Congressman may tap his foot under the stall in proposition. The child won't understand this anyhow and will receive no mental scars.

Let the child ride his goddamn bike without a helmet if he wants. Let the fucking kid have fun. I grew up in a time where bike helmets barely even existed and the only kid who wore one was an outcast we called lord helmet and sprayed with the garden hose as he rode by. We all survived our childhoods without a billion and one rules and most of us grew up normal and probably more well adjusted because if we were allowed to hit our head or scrape our knee from time to time we learned lessons from it. Let your fucking child grow up and learn something. It's no wonder the up and coming generations can't even wipe their own asses without expecting a reward for it. It's going to take years of therapy to undo the trauma that this sort of parenting is creating.

Photobucket... Helping Silence The Dissent.

I have to point something out but I'll make it quick. In the 237 odd blogs that I've posted I have posted at least as many photos. Today when I went to my photobucket I noticed that two photos had been deleted by photobucket for violated terms of use. It just so happens that both of those photos contained Obama and Socialist propaganda posters. Now, not a single other photo I've added has violated those terms. GO FIGURE!

J J Jihad!

This one was simply too good not to post. I pride myself on helping to piss off Jihadists all over the world. Thanks to The Lone Voice.



Fuck you you stone-aged retards and your shit covered left hands!

Obama Predicts The Passing of His Healthcare Plan

I love translating news stories and providing foot notes so that it's easier for everybody. I feel like I'm providing a much needed public service. So, on that note, here's another.

On a visit to Mexico, our Marxist Ruler Barack Obama recently predicted that Congress would pass his impending disaster of a health care plan this fall after more "sensible and reasoned arguments" prevail. But he said immigration changes, another politically explosive subject, would have to wait until next year.

Those more "sensible and reasoned arguments" don't actually require sense or reason, they do, in fact, require the complete lack of either. Sense and reason in this case, translate to willing obedience and unquestioning loyalty to the American Bolshevic Party ideals (Democrats). Immigration "changes" will have to wait. Those aren't important anyway, no Mexicans come across our borders illegally anyhow. Even if they did they wouldn't do it just to pop out a baby within our border so they could stay, or otherwise put a strain on our healthcare system so there are no worries about that.

The glorious leader also defended U.S. efforts to help restore Honduran President Manuel Zelaya, who was recently ousted coup. He said critics of his policy in Honduras smacked of "hypocrisy," faulting the United States for being too heavy-handed in Latin America and yet telling him he has not intervened enough in this instance.

If you do some research on the history of socialism and communism, you will quickly find that it eventually requires that everybody be included. The removal of the Honduran leader is the removal of a socialist leader. Thus, the need for Obama to intervene in order to restore as well as the call (by other socialist leaders) for Obama to step up.

Obama spoke at a news conference with Mexican President Felipe Calderon and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, where he confronted questions on both his foreign and domestic agendas, from drugs in Mexico to the testy health care fight at home.

Mexican officials from the top down are generally too corrupt to fix any of their own problems. Thus, the discussion which is constant in America about fixing it for them. Socialists help one another.

The president did not directly mention the outbursts and tempers disrupting town halls on health care around the country. Republicans are pointing to them as signs of public dissatisfaction with Obama's health care efforts, while Democrats have accused Republicans of trying to sabotage the democratic discussion.

This is actually a really interesting statement. "The Republicans are trying to sabotage democratic discussion." I haven't seen a single town hall meeting yet where the Democrats wanted "democratic discussion." What they wanted and it's obvious if you simply watch some of them, was for the time to be used by them to talk about their ideas (to try to convince us). Any time democratic discussion reared it's ugly head the Liberal goons beat it dead with blunt force trauma. Then, like good Marxist goons (or 5 year old children), they proceed to spew propaganda about how it was the Republicans trying to disrupt things. Yes, the Republicans are trying to disrupt things. They're trying to use their democratic right to vote down something they don't agree with but the Bolsheviks don't agree that they should have that right. So, instead, they throw the first punches and when the Conservatives fight back they scream and cry about how "he hit me!"

Obama said "I suspect that once we get into the fall and people look at the actual legislation that's being proposed, that more sensible and reasoned arguments will emerge, and we're going to get this passed."

It's good to see he's properly delusional.

Obama backed Calderon and his efforts to take on drug cartels during a spiraling war on drugs and guns. Washington is debating whether to withhold money to help fight the powerful cartels because of allegations that the Mexican military has been guilty of human rights abuses.

This actually comes out of the Liberal Rule Book. This is one of the more important rules listed actually. Rule #6 in the Liberal Rule Book states. "It is very important that when you are fighting for something, especially if you are fighting in dangerous circumstances such as war, you must handicap yourself as much so as possible by enacting rules upon yourselves that the enemy will not have to comply with." For example, if you are in a fist fight you will want to cut off both of your arms before you begin. If you are fighting against hostile and armed parties who want to kill you, you should fight them with love and kindness.

You must give them liberties that they would not give you. You should show them mercy that they would not show you. You should release their prisoners back into their ranks while they behead yours. You must never allow collateral damage. You may never attack if you know there is any chance that an "innocent" could be harmed, even if that innocent may be a disguised enemy. You may not even attack in these circumstances if it will bring victory for your cause. If you are in a firefight and the enemy uses a woman as a human shield then you must immediately put down your weapon and allow him to shoot you, it is better than accidentally hitting the woman.

Obama said he had great confidence that under Calderon "human rights will be observed."

That's good Obama, stick to that! Under Obama and his human rights, we'll win that war on the cartels. I predict complete victory by 2010, no later than the 5th of never.

Calderon said the Mexican government has an "absolute and categorical" commitment to human rights.

Targeting the long and painful recession, Obama said that he and the other two leaders agreed to take "aggressive, coordinated action" to restore growth across North America.

They just failed to mention that the growth they're going to restore is the growth of the Latino immigrant community until they reach their goal of diluting the American voter pool enough to create the United Socialist States of Canimeximerica.

Noting the huge trading partnership among the three neighbors, Obama said that commerce must be expanded, not restricted.

Which will conveniently help more businesses to cheaply move additional industry across the borders where labor is cheaper and ship the products back into the states free of charge and at greatly expanded profits.

Obama said that a "Buy America" provision in the giant economic stimulus package earlier this year had not hurt trade with Canada. "I do think it's important to keep this in perspective," he said. "This in no way has endangered the billions of dollars in trade taking place between our two countries."

I know this is true because nearly everything I own says "Made In Canada." Well maybe not everything... or anything. What exactly do we get from Canada? What exactly does Canada do except shiver and provide shoddy socialist healthcare?

Harper rallied behind Obama on Honduras. "If I were an American, I would be really fed up with this kind of hypocrisy," he said.

Cough Cough Karl Marx Cough.

Obama said his administration has been clear in its view that Zelaya was forced out of his post illegally, and he said the U.S. is working with international bodies to send that message. "If these critics think that it's appropriate for us to suddenly act in ways that in every other context they consider inappropriate, then I think what that indicates is that maybe there's some hypocrisy involved in their approach to U.S.-Latin American relations," Obama said. He did not name any critics.

And yet, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad got into his post illegally and Obama will stand by and do nothing. Priorities straight... nah, we'll get that later.

Streets around the complex were sealed off by heavily armed federal agents and police in riot gear.

Just an unnecessary precaution in such a wonderful and safe utopia such as Mexico.

In a separate meeting with Calderon, Obama voiced strong support of the offensive, but Calderon expressed concerns about delays in the latest installment of U.S. aid under the $1.4 billion Merida Initiative.

Of course he's concerned, his welfare check is late, how can he get a new Presidential Mansion without it?

Calderon also pressed Obama on allowing Mexican trucks access to U.S. highways. Mexicans suggest the U.S. limits are less about safety — the stated reason — than protecting American hauling companies from competition under the NAFTA free trade accord.

That, and the fact that without it he might just get enough of his most useless people across the border into the United States to put the strain on our social systems and get it off of his own. A smart leader would build a wall and say fix your corruption, fix your problems, and then we'll talk about partnership but we haven't had a smart leader in decades.

We Need To Insure The Illegals For Our System To Work?

This is one of those read between the liners.

Oakland, California (a great place for a post apocalyptic thriller) Delmira Maravilla (say that one three times fast) is anxious for a check-up — and for a timeline on the president's promise of health care for all Americans.

I bet you can guess why too, can't you? C'mon, give it a shot.

She's paying out of pocket for the exam... not what you were thinking? I know, that's not what I was getting at. She apparently represents 1/3 of Hispanics (approximately 44,852,816, not counting illegals who hid from the census which is anywhere from 7 to 20 million) and she has 9 children and doesn't have health insurance.

Now I have two problems with this. If you don't have health insurance why do you have 9 kids. I don't care what ethnicity you are, if you can't provide for them then you shouldn't be having them. Don't try to tell me "maybe she lost it, you know better."

The article goes on to explain that Latinos like this one have much to gain if the legislation taking shape in Washington passes. Among the major ethnic groups, they are the least likely to have health coverage through work. And Hispanics often face language and cultural hurdles to getting good-quality health services. They're far less likely to have a regular health-care provider, and to get the kind of routine screening that prevents serious health problems.

Now if you read my blog enough you probably know exactly what I'm about to say. The article conveniently leaves out whether this woman is or is not legal. When they leave out that particular bit of information it's usually because they're trying to put a feel sorry for her spin on it without killing that by telling you she's not allowed to be here in the first place. I don't feel sorry for her, I truly don't, not even a little bit if that's the case. I wouldn't just pick up and roll into some other country, buy some forged papers, and then complain they owe me and I don't respect others who do the same. I would say I'm happy she can't get the "routine screenings" of which they speak but I know she would just go to the ER and we would pay for it anyhow.

Maravilla knows how easily her family's carefully calculated budget can be overwhelmed by the cost of health care: her 6-year-old daughter's recent fall against the edge of a table set her back a devastating $1,500 in emergency room bills. Any accident, any unexpected illness, can be catastrophic, she said.

"I would be so much calmer, less worried, if I knew I had health insurance for my family," she said. "Health problems happen to everyone, but it's too expensive for us who are poor."

Of course they are, I would be so much calmer if I could have a lot of things but if I shit in one hand and wish in the other... well, you know the rest.

Experts say health disparities among ethnic groups are great, with one in three Hispanics and one in five African-Americans not having health insurance, compared with one in eight whites. And as the recession deepens, the gap is growing along with rising unemployment and cuts to work-sponsored insurance.

I'm not going to break down the statistics separating minorities from whites. All I will say is to take a good hard look at education levels, citizen status, and so on. And this is where the "Liberals" throw a tantrum and say that inner city schools are no good and it's whitey's fault and that's why this happens. If you want to go that route then you pay for their insurance. You become a teacher and you teach them so they can get into a good school. Or, you could even sponsor one of them to go to college. We'll see how well your money is spent.

"We can't have the status quo. It's just a disgrace. I don't know what other words to use," said Elena Rios, president of the National Hispanic Medical Association, a nonprofit group that represents Hispanic doctors.

Rios was among the advocates calling on legislators to consider measures designed to bolster care for Hispanics through preventive medicine, health education and increased diversity in the medical field.

Jane Garcia, the CEO of La Clinica de la Raza where Maravilla gets her checkups, sees the need for reform every time she makes her rounds.

I would like to form a group that represents white doctors and see where that goes. You've heard it before but it's the truth.

About 71 percent of her patients are Latino; 44 percent are uninsured, and that number has been going up. New patients range from the recently unemployed to undocumented immigrants who can no longer get care in neighboring Contra Costa County, where supervisors squeezed by a budget shortfall voted to cut services to them.

Couldn't have anything to do with the number of illegals flooding across the borders daily could it? Or maybe the fact that these "minority groups" pop out children like it's their job. Actually in many cases it is their only job.

"The number of people presenting for services are really overwhelming to the system," she said. "And more of them are coming in uninsured."

Well no shit. And the state of our economy in the first place surely isn't assisted in it's downward spiral by the wasting of taxpayer money on people who aren't even allowed to be in the country now I'm sure.

Although the House bill represents the most comprehensive effort to date to extend health care to all Americans, there is a significant segment of the population that will likely be excluded: illegal immigrants. Pressed by CBS News' Katie Couric about whether they should be covered, the president responded simply, "no."

Do you believe that? From what I've read that isn't the case at all. You know there will be a provision for exactly that in there. It really wouldn't be the first time, or even a time under double digits that Obama (and the rest of the politicians on either side) have flat out lied to us to get what they want.

Absent immigration reform and a path to citizenship, that would mean millions could be left out of the system. About 59 percent of the 11.9 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States have no health insurance, according to the Pew Hispanic Center.

Good, and I hope they are either forced to return to where they came from, or they can die as a result of not being able to get proper medical care and I won't shed a tear.

Advocates are split on whether to hold out for reform that includes them, or support change that would help the majority of Hispanics.

I can't even believe that statement. Advocates of illegals might want to hold out so that the American taxpayer has to pay for a non-citizen. Why not just include all of Mexico? Hell, while we're at it why don't we just pay for healthcare for all of Africa too, they're poor and sick and all that bullshit. Now that idea might be laughable if the Dems wouldn't try to put it into law in a heartbeat if they thought the American people would go for it.

"This has always been in the elephant in the room — all of our families are mixed, some documented, some undocumented," said Rios. "But we're so close to having health care reform. We'd be working against ourselves to let immigration issues stall the process."

It should be obvious at this point if it wasn't before. This shows you exactly who's pushing the hardest for these things. They're quickly becoming the majority. When the minority (which will soon be whites) has the better education (whatever the reason) and the better jobs (again whatever the reason) and they're asked to carry the majority, you get a Marxist society. Every group has to try their hand to realize that socialism fails. It always fails, it's fundamentally flawed. The groups who push these things through have nothing to lose. The whites who will ultimately carry this plan until their backs break will hit bottom far harder than those who will bring the beast down.

Others, like Jennifer Ng'andu, deputy director of the National Council of La Raza's Health Policy Project, believe any plan that doesn't include undocumented immigrants won't last. They make up about 15 percent of the nation's approximately 47 million uninsured.

The nerve of these "protective groups" is staggering.

"If we don't talk about integrating communities that have been traditionally shut out, we're going to be talking about health care reform again in 15 years," said Ng'andu, who has been talking to legislators and to health care advocates on their behalf.

To proponents of greater immigration controls, allowing illegal immigrants to benefit from federally subsidized health care and insurance would go against enforcement goals by legitimizing their presence.

Well no shit. And I'm sure half or more of those who read this will say I'm simply racist. Fact of the matter is that I don't care what race you are I don't feel that I should have to support you, black, white, purple, etc. I would be for a form of reform. If all adults in a family work full time and don't irresponsibly reproduce then I think they should get some assistance assuming they're legal. That's not what this legislation is trying to do.

Undocumented immigrants are the majority of Rogelio Fernandez's patients at the United Health Centers clinic in Parlier, a town of approximately 12,000 whose population swells and dips with field workers following agriculture's planting, pruning and harvest seasons.

We know this and yet it fails to be put to an end.

His clinic provides primary care on a sliding-fee scale and discounted medication to those who need it. But in this tough economy, he's seeing patients cut back on visits and on their medication because, without insurance, they can't afford them.

"Unless they are more inclusive, these proposals really won't help a lot of our patients," said Fernandez.

Studies show that inadequate access to regular, quality health care that meets their language needs has consequences. Hispanics are suffering disproportionately from chronic diseases such as diabetes and getting less preventive measures such as cancer screenings and obesity counseling.

You have language needs? Learn the goddamn language of the country you are in, that is your need. Again, I'm not going to go to Sweden and complain that they won't speak to me in English. That's not only ignorant, it's arrogant, and it's totally ridiculous. There should be absolutely not language requirements for Americans. If I want to live in a country I'm going to either learn the language first, or I'll expect hardship for a while when I get there.

Not taking care of this population now will have real costs in the future, said Rios. Hispanics make up 15 percent of the total U.S. population, but they represent 25 percent of children in preschools and kindergartens.

Promising statistic, makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside. Mexico is a fucked up shithole, and soon the United States will be dragged into the abyss with it.

"We are at a time when we need change, or we're going to see an increase in obesity, diabetes, cancers, heart disease," said Rios. "It's not fair to them, to us, to the country."

Like I said, it's perfectly fair, in fact, it should be expected, and it should be allowed and used as a lesson. Where the hell is my free handout. Oh yeah, "to each according to his need, from each according to his ability." That's just fucking grand.